Jump to content
  • Finish your profile right here  and directions for adding your Profile Picture (which appears when you post) is right here.

DuckHeart

Members
  • Posts

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DuckHeart

  1. On 10/16/2024 at 2:27 PM, Charles Fischer said:

    I love how he came up with this, but it does not remove the fact that his judgment almost cost Oregon the game.  4th and 2....you take the damn points.  Then you have a four-point lead, and the whole discussion of Ohio State getting in FG range is moot.

     

    Going for it on 4th down has the odds they do...for a reason.  He will have to lose another game or two by not playing the odds until he learns!

     

    Agree. I think we are getting ahead of ourselves with all the DL is a genius talk.  Yes, the 12th man ploy was great and call it genius if you want.  But DL still needs to learn when to take the FG.  And when it's 4th and 2 at midfield you might want to punt, pin them deep and rely on your defense to get the offense a short field.  

    • Great post! 1
    • Thumbs Up 2
  2. On 10/16/2024 at 8:11 AM, Drake said:

    You may have missed the point.

     

    Oregon did not play a perfect game, and still won. In Past years, we would have needed a perfect game to have a chance to win a game like this…
     

    The article points out that many commentators after the game stated that tOSU was the better team. The article simply points out that the Ducks were far from perfect, and that those comments are somewhat jaded. 
     

     

    I got the point.  I was just trying to point out the "alternate universe" fallacy.

     

    Yes, the Ducks weren't perfect and they won.  But OSU was also not perfect and they almost won.  Many OSU fans have made the point that their team made lots of mistakes---couple of turnovers, unforced penalties and were still in a position to win at the end.  

     

    And do you know what?  Neither team will be perfect in the possible Big 10 title game which will be on a neutral but majority OSU field.

    • Go Ducks! 1
    • Salute 1
    • Applause 2
    • Thumbs Up 1
  3. I'll disagree, we don't know if any of this would had played out the same way:    Say for instance that Bassa's interception was correctly called.  But who can say what may have happened next?  Maybe on the next play a Gabriel pass would have bounced off of Ferguson's hands and into the hands of an OSU's safety who then took it to the house.   

     

    And talk about opportunities which went awry, how about the strip fumble down near the goal line?   Sure, it was a hell of a play by the Ducks but heck let say in our alternative universe that OSU should have had points on that drive.

     

    No, this was not an almost 43 to 24 Duck victory.  It was a really close game between two really good teams.

    • Applause 1
    • Thumbs Up 3
  4. Ducks' ox gored; Beavers' ox gored; it's a matter of perspective.

     

    I was an attorney for 40 years.  If I learned one thing is that perception of justice is in the eye of the beholder. 

     

    I haven't done a deep dive in the Pac 12 to 2 debacle.  My take:  The Pac 12 was going to die.  The networks wanted it to happen.  WSU and OSU got screwed in the process, U of O and the other departing teams owed them something.  U of O and the other departing teams surely gamed planned their departure; they would have run it by advisors including high priced attorneys----the 10 knew what they were doing.   There were contracts and bylaws, rules and regulations along with financial and public relation issues.  Those 10, again being fully advised, apparently reached an agreement.  Good for them.

     

    There was not theft in the legal sense.  There also weren't  thefts in ethical and moral realms.  Just a bunch of entities doing a work out of a difficult problem

     

    Now, back the Merry Christmas!

     

    Jerry

    • Thumbs Up 1
  5. No failures.  Two head coaches and three offensive coordinators (I think that's right) saw him in practice and in games.   And I bet all of them saw pretty much the same thing as we did.  We all wanted Ty to do well, in fact we all wanted him to do great things on the field.  It didn't work out and it is best for him to move on.  

     

    • Great post! 1
    • Applause 1
  6. Bo's decision to play is totally within character.  Sure, other players make different decisions and that is totally fine.  (Some of you on this board would make a different decision.).  But he loves football, loves Oregon and loves his teammates.   I think he made his decision based on those feelings----and based on the code that he lives by.

     

    Don't forget, Bo is really intelligent.  3.9 GPA, got his degree magna cum laude from Auburn.  He knows the risks, he also knows himself; good for him that he does.

     

     

    • Thumbs Up 5
  7. Lot's of talk that a successful college QB will get $1 million to $2 million in NIL money.   What's the market for Moore?  He flashed  talent but also showed he wasn't ready to start at UCLA.   He has the upside to be great.   Our staff knows him; recruited him; had him but lost him.

     

    I think the Ducks go after him. 

  8. I can't understand why anyone who is legally an adult (18 years old) should not be able to profit from their name, image, and likeness.   These are not legally kids.

     

    Yeah, lots of downside to money at an early age.  The young immature adults may blow it on cars, expensive apartments and so forth.   They may not pay their quarterly estimates of federal and state taxes.   But that is where the school can provide guidance.  The school can----gasp----educate the student athletes on contracts, money management etc.

     

    As I see it, the major problem is that the governing bodies stuck their collective heads in the sand and pretended that the Supreme Court would rule in the NCAA's favor in the Alston case.  I disagree with a lot of what Justice Kavanaugh says in other cases but I agree with what he had to say in his concurring opinion:  “Nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate. … The NCAA is not above the law.”

     

    The NCAA basically was saying that a very big business could exempt itself from anti-trust laws, reap huge benefits for coaches and others and agree (conspire in other words) to pay the players nothing but tuition, books and room and board.   The NCAA's position created the mess; can the NCAA come up with legal regulations of NIL payments?  Possibly but don't count on it.

     

    Is this bad for the traditional college sports fan?  Well, maybe.  But so what?  

     

    And let's not forget the rampant cheating (paying the players) that has always been part of major college sports.  And the Ducks have not been innocent.  I was at Oregon 1972-1976.  I saw Ronnie Lee in his new Chevrolet Monte Carlo.   I was told by an employee of Joe Romania Chevrolet that the basketball team was on the dealership's payroll.

    • Thumbs Up 3
  9. On 1/23/2022 at 3:25 PM, 30Duck said:

    3 Playoff games this round, all of them decided by the visiting team kicking a game winning field goal as time ran out.  Rams 30 Bucs 27. Congrats to McVay, it looked like the Rams were content with OT, but they go deep to Cooper Kupp, from EWU. He leads NFL receivers in catches, yards and touchdowns. 

    The DC elected to bring pressure and cover Krupp with a saftey---a  bad idea.  Not just a bad idea but a really stupid bad idea.  That play doesn't happen but for the boneheaded defensive call.   

    • Thumbs Up 1
×
×
  • Create New...
Top