Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Moderator

One of the things they stated in this article is:

"One scheduling change that appears extremely unlikely in the short-term is the Pac-12 playing eight conference games instead of nine because the the Big Ten is unwilling to reduce its league schedule."

 

I might not fully understand this statement, but why should the PAC12 based their decision to go to eight conference games due to BIG Ten's decision not to reduce league schedule from nine to eight?  We play eight conference games and PAC 12 championship makes 9 games.  SEC and I think ACC does it.   We would still play three out of conference games.

Edited by NJDuck

The Pac 12 shouldn't be concerned with the B1G TEN, however if keeping 9 conference games, keeps the B1G TEN happy that eventually hamstrings the SEC, then so be it.  

 

Dead horse, all P5 conferences should have the same number of conference games.

Create an account or sign in to comment