Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Moderator

 

Wow, surprised it was denied.  With Dante, Oregon's team would be contenders.  They still will be really good next year, but with Dante...

  • Moderator
On 5/30/2024 at 11:07 AM, NJDuck said:

 

Wow, surprised it was denied.  With Dante, Oregon's team would be contenders.  They still will be really good next year, but with Dante...

It's the NCAA. Logic need not apply.

  • Moderator

 

The NCAA's ruling on Dante's eligibility request stands in stark contrast to the decision made for former Ohio State and Harvard forward Seth Towns, who was recently granted an eighth year of eligibility. Towns, who voluntarily sat out one season, has been given the green light to extend his college career, while Dante, who played just six games as a sophomore due to a torn ACL during the 2020-2021 season, finds his request denied.

 

Words. Signs. Where to look. What to find. None of that can be deciphered when attempting to figure out the NCAA rulings. The lack of consistency, the lack of credibly portraying that their mission is to support student athletes is laughable at times. The lack of clarity is more than just frustrating – it is a clarion call that the time is now for change. The ruling was wrong and only one person will really suffer.

 

Does the NCAA even care? It seems not. So much for their bold mission.

 

OREGON.RIVALS.COM

Today in Flock Talk, a look at the incredible inconsistency in the NCAA ruling denying N'Faly Dante another year.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment