jrw

The mere fact that you're asking the question is scary, Ryan. If an 18-year-old who has not played a down is seen as a potential savior, we're not in for a good season.

Is it presumptuous of us to think that we get to pick and choose? Is the Ducks' program that attractive to coaches who could go virtually anywhere?

Agreed, bud I'd settle for winning, by whatever method works.

I see the Ducks in a "Yes, but..." situation. • Yes, they were the youngest, most inexperienced team in the nation. • Yes, the COVID impact hurts a young, inexperienced team more than others. • Yes, they had a new offensive coordinator and a new scheme, with little practice time and few games in which to learn. • Yes, they lost a 4-year star starter at QB and the entire O line. • Yes, they had established stars and leaders on defense opt out. That's a lotta "yes" explanations or excuses, which I think are valid. I feel many of us had unrealistic expectations for this season given all the above. • But, the team often seemed unprepared, unfocused and undisciplined in all facets of the game. • But, the same old failed and failing brain-dead plays were being called in the obvious situations. • But, the QB situation was handled really, really badly, so that everybody lost. I think this season was not one that yields a realistic evaluation of the coaches and players. If there is a normal season this year (still doubtful), then we can gauge how well the team is set up for the future with Mario at the helm. It seems likely Avalos will depart, and I would not bet on Moorhead sticking around; the way things have gone doesn't give me much belief that he is in charge of the offense and the play calling. He's too talented to put up with that. I'm throwing out this season and hoping that a better picture emerges in the coming 12 months.

Well, Oregon lays an egg on the national stage. On offense, defense, special teams and on the sidelines.

I give up. The worst play call, over and over and over and over and...

Put in a QB - which one I don't care - then stick with him.

Well...freshmen are inexperienced every year, by definition . The bulk of the team, more than 75%, has two or more years to grow and mature.

Regardless of the outcome, I see a very, very young Ducks team that suffers hugely, both in talent and leadership, from the opt-outs in the defensive backfield. They're game, they're talented, but mistakes hurt them. And, Iowa State is really, really good on offense. Who can tell about their defense when they always have the ball?

Malibu Mustache Man!

Iowa State is what a well-coached, disciplined, cohesive team looks like. They're really good.

Very, very thin depth at ILB.

Santa Rosa Duck, I think (and I hope) you are right.

It's only partway through the second quarter with a one-touchdown deficit. Let's quell the panic. Iowa State is a really good team.

My biggest fear coming into this game was that the Ducks would lay a massive egg.

It appears that one team can run straight ahead into the line and succeed.