Charles Fischer

If you believe this guy....

Oh my gosh...

C'mon...we all need a smile right now. "It was getting a little chummy in here..."

Welcome, and a couple of questions/comments for you. --What school do you follow? (This way I can give you the correct helmet as an avatar.) Many of us do not wish to join the Big-12 for a couple of reasons: 1. The travel to the Big-12 is as bad for Olympic sports as the B1G, without the additional revenue. 2. While Oregon would be a prime member of the Big-12, we would rather retain the conference we are currently in. If we have to change--the B1G is a better match for money. (Since that is what this is all about) 3. It is only a matter of time before ESPN and Fox urge their conferences (SEC and B1G) to poach the better teams in the Big-12. 4. It is really not a cultural fit. 5. The fans rarely want these changes; most Oklahoma and Texas fans do NOT want to move to the SEC, and tons of LA fans do not want to leave the Pac-12. But who listens to those paying the freight? Thank you for your kind thoughts about the forum. I love this community...

Bill Oram is part of the new narrative, that if the Pac-12 crumbles and Oregon goes to the B1G...then the demise of the Civil War is the Ducks fault? Typical slanted journalistic reasoning...

Yep, they want only easy wins each year to join their conference. They know Oregon is going to make it harder for them...

Savagefund...where do Utah fans sit with all of this?

As I ponder it...I do NOT like what Canzano is doing. He is beginning a narrative that will be used later blaming, "Oregon was the reason the Pac-12 folded." It will play well with his Oregon State readers.

"USC has been opposed to the idea of adding more teams from the West Coast to the Big Ten - they are set to join next year, along with UCLA - but the Trojans do not have a vote on expansion yet." "The Big Ten could vote to add their former Pac-12 rivals without even consulting them."

I am assuming it is a pay-wall article, and frankly he does not say much other than he feels that Oregon is in charge making the decisions and the other schools will react to what the Ducks do. Do you agree? (I don't) It seems to me that Colorado and the other four-corner schools are on their own path--regardless of Oregon. Yet Canzano feels that if Oregon sticks with the Pac-12, so will Washington and the other schools.

The new USC theme song...is about Oregon!

Omigosh! Read the article below... "The Big Ten move was supposed to clearly reestablish USC as the top program on the West Coast." "The Trojans were adamant with the Big Ten that they did not want to be followed to this exciting opportunity by their Pac-12 brethren. They singled out a specific school they found to be most distasteful. If the Big Ten thought it had to add Stanford or Cal or Washington, USC could probably live with it. But not Oregon." "No, no, no. Anybody but the Ducks. That preference, shared by UCLA, was certainly understood, and the L.A. schools assumed it would be honored." "Oregon waddling around with a Big Ten swagger would be dangerous." Commentary: USC may not be able to escape its Oregon problem in Big Ten after all WWW.LATIMES.COM USC wants to establish itself as the West Coast power again in the Big Ten, but Oregon could make it difficult if it's invited to join.

The heck of it is...I don't know of any Oregon fans who feel good about this at all. We want to bury Oregon State on the field, but not like this. We are not like USC fans...

Oh, this is good...

And yes...this business of going to the B1G is all conjecture, but when it comes to the Trojans...