Jon Joseph

Let's Twist again like we did last ball game, let's twist again, Twisting time is here! 😁

How do you score 12 points in the 1st half? I can't. But it reminds me of a question asked Seve Ballesteros after a round at the Masters, and after he four-putted the 18th hole. Seve, how did you 4-putt? "I mezz, I mezz, I mezz, I make."😁

The game between Oregon and Maryland would be fit for an Aesop Fable. The Tortoise and the Duck. The Ducks have yet to lift off. 31-12 Terps at halftime. Do college sports really need a postseason? At least for the Moneyball sports. 🤬

Too convoluted? I don't think so. Especially if the B1G and the SEC break away and the 'Super Conference' has 34 teams, possibly as many as 40 teams with the addition of Notre Dame and other immediately accretive teams. When looking at where the teams are located, pods in the NFL more or less make sense. However, every team in the NFL has a Blue Chip + roster, and the goal of the NFL is parity. Teams that underperform, like New England without Brady, play easier schedules than successful teams. Mike Whitty's goal is to achieve parity in scheduling in the Big Ten. As Mike the Hiker notes, the B1G has too many teams, as does the SEC, to achieve parity. Without salary caps, differences in budgets for football, no restriction on player movement, and the differences in money available for NIL, I don't believe any CFB scheduling model, and Mike's is as good as I have seen, will produce balanced schedules. If players are not deemed to be employees, and there is no uniform, enforceable, bargained-for agreement with the players, and uniform investment in football programs, I don't see a Northeast Pod of Maryland, Rutgers, an add-on UVA, and Penn State, being competitive with a West Pod of OBD, UCLA, USC, and UW. In a given year, a team or three in today's mega conferences will get the short end of the scheduling stick. Perhaps if one of the scheduling goals wasn't having every team in a conference play one another over a period of years, parity could be achieved? But parity would have to depend upon a team's performance in a given season, or over a few seasons. How do you factor in an Indiana? College basketball uses disclosed metrics to balance out teams based on the strength of schedule (SOS). 31-0 Miami of Ohio is not likely to be seeded higher than 9th. The college football committee simply wings it. And the CFB committee is not helped by a media company with rankings tease shows, and not the NCAA, managing the playoff. All of the supposed improved metrics in the hands of the committee still equate to how many losses a team has, except for Bama, of course. Mike's goal is worthy, no doubt. But without systemic changes modeled on the NFL format, including a draft of high school players, I don't believe we will see equity in CFB scheduling. What we could and should see is a CFB Playoff committee making its decisions based upon disclosed metrics that, among other things, make SOS a determining factor when deciding on and seeding the PO field. Good luck.

All my bags are packed; I'm ready to...? Is it time for the Power 2 to take a powder? https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2026/03/10/what-did-sec-big-ten-learn-at-president-trump-roundtable-its-time-to-go/89072802007/?utm_source=usatoday-sports-strada&utm_medium=email&utm_cam

Heading into Spring practice, CBS Sports has B1G questions - OBD - Will all of the talent show up? https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/big-ten-football-spring-2026-burning-questions-each-team/?ftag=SNL-04-10aaa0b&ET_CID=531873&ET_RID=52482716

More on Miami-Ohio https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/miami-ohio-football-spending-nil-transfer-portal/

Not so Fast! It looks like the Left Coast Women's teams didn't get the memo. OBD, UCLA, perhaps the No.1 seed, USC, and UW are all headed to the NCAA tournament. Stuff happens.

Mike, spot on, citing Penn State's schedule. And Notre Dame? The Domers have a Golden path to the playoffs. On3Notre Dame, Georgia and, yes, North Dakota State among 6...Entering the 2026 college football season, there are six schools currently favored in all 12 of their regular-season games.

Good luck, yuck, yuck 😁. The NCAA Been There, Done This and Paid BIG Legal Fees to No Avail - On3Donald Trump proposes return to pre-NIL era, wants to 'ra....

Beat the Twerps, er, Terps! On32026 Big Ten Men's Basketball Tournament Bracket: Finaliz....

Thanks, Mike. Your format, including flex scheduling, could work and would be an improvement on the current throw of the scheduling dice from 2024 through 2028. The difficulty would be in selling the idea to Tony P and the folks at Fox, CBS, and NBC. But as you noted before, discussing the issue is a start. As iuphound pointed out, and as Charles commented on above, the Legends and Leaders split, followed by the more aptly named East-West, did not work out, due to Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, and, on one occasion, Michigan State's dominance. Two years in, OBD has won a conference championship, with the other won by Indiana. Not what the folks in B1G HQ imagined when putting the schedules together. I do believe Petitti's 24-team playoff without automatic qualifiers format will be adopted, including no conference champ games being played. I also believe that, in addition to Oregon, SC, UCLA, and UW are spending the money required to be successful in football. Wisconsin has stepped up, and one day, Nebraska may see a decent return on its football investment. So, would East-West Divisions be better balanced today? I think OBD, USC, UCLA, UW, Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illinois could be competitive versus the East. Perhaps a flex-scheduled East-West crossover conference opening slate of games using the prior season's standings, and a final week of crossover games using the standings after the penultimate week of the regular season. Play ten conference games, eight division, and two crossover games. Have half of the B1G teams idle in Week Six, the other half in Week Seven. Could the ACC, B12, and SEC be convinced to play ten conference games and follow the same format? I do think travel matters. Your Division structure would help with travel. Asking OBD to play two games in four weeks in the Eastern time zone in November is handing Oregon the short end of the scheduling stick. Trying to balance the in-conference SOS is certainly worthy of consideration. Can the folks in Chicago be convinced? Great follow-up article, Mike, thank you.

The Dyke is Breaking - Sonny's On Board - https://www.foxsports.com/stories/college-football/sonny-dykes-cfp-expansion-24-team-playoff-fcs-model

Thanks, NJ. A few suggestions: Arizona - Jose Cuerzo Gold ASU - Carrier Air Conditioning Alabama - Aflac Auburn - Charmin Soft TP Baylor - Chip and Joanna's Fixer-Upper Boston College - Legal Seafoods/ Bush Boston Baked Beans BYU - Mission Foods CAL - Shake 'N Bake Cincinnati - Red Hots Clemson - H&S Transfer Company Colorado - Ralphie's Pizza Duke - Devil's Lightning Hot Sauce Florida - SwampBuggy Georgia Tech - Rent A Wreck Illinois - Bret's Chips Indiana - Phillip Morris Cigarettes Iowa State - Campbell's Soup Kansas - Toto Toilets Kentucky - Stein Mart LSU - Oxford O4OR Tail Bag Maryland - Turtlebox Speakers Miami - Temu CrystalBalls Michigan - Moore Enterprises Minnesota - Gopher Hawk Missouri - ShowMe Educational Systems Nebraska - Walmart Durable Corn Schukers North Carolina - Girls Clothing at Janie & Jack Northwestern - Hazing Prevention Network Notre Dame - Independence Pet Holdings Ohio State - Buckeye Partners Oklahoma State - Gundy Enterprises Limited Oregon State - New World Enterprises Inc. Cleaning Company Oregon - Duckhorn Vineyards/ Qwackers Crackers Enough! I'm off to (perhaps) Get a Life - 😁

The Oregon Women's CBB Team is expected to open NCAA play against VA Tech - Win, and the reward is a game vs. No. 1 Texas in Austin 🦆👍 https://www.yardbarker.com/general_sports/articles/oregon_ducks_womens_basketballs_updated_ncaa_tournament_projection/s1_16787_43563731?utm_source=mb&utm_medium=email&mb_edition=20260308&mb_loc=right_h