4 minutes ago, OregonDucks said:

In Drew Mehringer’s lone season as OC, Rutgers ranked 127 of 128 in offensive points per game.

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/years/2016-team-offense.html

People grow and people change.

I'm not saying he's my first choice but I'm also sure that Lanning see way more than we ever will.

And as I have zero input into who the OC will be... I'm cool with whoever Lanning picks. At least for now... But I am sure I'll be yelling at them via an article next year to run the ball more. I've done it for Lanning's first four years and I will plan on doing so in year five as well!

4 hours ago, OregonDucks said:

The OC position at Oregon is one of the most coveted in college football given our reputation, talent, resources and track record of prior OCs becoming HCs. We should be able to hire a top notch, experienced OC.

Whose to say he isn't a top notch candidate?

If Dan trusts him then I am absolutely fine with it.

Makes sense... I mean its kinda surprising they came out to Eugene twice considering they don't get to broadcast any B1G games. They do get to broadcast the SEC championship game so they might as well hype it up.

14 hours ago, Jon Joseph said:

If the Commish Brett Yormark's 2 B12 PO teams fix is in, the Cougars defeat Texas Tech, and so long No. 10 Notre Dame. I do not see BYU winning the B12 champ game. Texas Tech has a significant Big 12 roster advantage.🤑

That No. 10 Notre Dame dropped below No. 9 Bama is telling. The Irish and not Bama, Bama is in the field unless the Tide is eviscerated by Georgia in the SEC champ game.

They are definitely protecting the SEC and Alabama here by moving them up one place. Notre Dame will get cut if it comes down to it and Bama probably protected.

But Miami is probably out no matter what at this point... so that is kinda delightful in itself.

A few things have me feeling pretty good.

In the post I saw about Stein taking the Kentucky job it also said he would continue his duties with the team until the season ends. He probably has an arrangement similar to what Lanning had with Smart at Georgia, where he wasn't allowed to recruit for the team anymore but could begin to recruit for his new team.

What makes things more difficult for Stein is that I don't think he is officially hired at Kentucky yet and TODAY is National Signing Day so who knows the recruiting class he even has to work with at the moment... well I guess I can look it up.... ranked 58th with 15 recruits basically all three stars on Rivals and I can't tell who has actually signed at this point anyways.

The reality is that Stein is going to have to recruit who he can before the second signing period and dive into the transfer portal. The portal doesn't open until January and I wouldn't be surprised if he takes the lion's share of Ducks who transfer.

His first season is going to be a bit rough but the reality is that with the NSD being so early now that new coaches are barely hired before they have to sign a recruiting class so they'll be portal heavy.

The same goes for Lupoi and Cal. Though in the case of Lupoi I haven't seen anything saying that he intends on finishing the year at Oregon or not. However, Hampton has called plays on defense before and Lanning is the HC so I am a little less concerned on that front.

7 minutes ago, Solar said:

It literally has not changed. Per Josh Pate, the BCS computer formulas are still being heavily relied on by the committee (who have much more important day jobs), with the main difference this year being that the committee is doing a bad job of justifying the results the computer is spitting out.

The committee with finally spend some time of their own these next two weeks, puting their heads together to make changes to what the computers tell them to do, so be prepared for real chaos with this week and the final rankings/seeding next Sunday.

I mean the biggest problem with a committee is how do you build a body of people who can be objective AND make it their only job for about four months to watch every single FBS football game? It's possible and I am sure there are people out there who could do it but is there the will or the desire to do it? No really.

A whole new system needs to be created because with super conference playing your schedule is the only thing you can do and sometimes your schedule is weak. I do not fault the Aggies for winning 11 games but I do fault them for losing to 3-loss Texas in their very last game. A top three team shouldn't have dropped that game.

15 minutes ago, Eric Boles said:

Coach Lanning could also hire someone none of us are thinking about.

I bet this will happen!!!

1 hour ago, TheRunningDuck said:

Hope he doesn't steal recruits as the day approaches.

I kinda doubt it... That would burn a bridge with Lanning and I have a feeling he wouldn't want to do that. Coaches talk a lot behind the scenes and burning a bridge by stealing recruits out the door is something that would burn those bridges real fast.

Besides there might some transfers out of Oregon that he would be interested in landing and that would be mutually beneficial for all involved. Not to say that couldnt happen in addition to stealing recruits.

This defense has worked great before the red zone.

I think there are some schematic problems for our red zone defense. Letting a touchdown happen from 4th and 8 against Washington kinda highlights the problem. That shouldn't have happened. It looks like there was a bit of a rub on the play that got Boston open but still... shouldn't have happened.

However, this team holds teams to less than 15 points per game so I can't complain too much.

2 hours ago, kirklandduck said:

So many of these coach firings are hilarious. He's only been at MSU for 2 seasons, what kind of changes were they expecting in such a short timeline? It's freaking M...S...U... 🤦‍♂️

Contending for a playoff spot is what they expected.

It took Smith third year at OSU to get it in the right direction.

Every program expects instant turnaround or continuation.

They look at Lanning and Cignetti and say... "We want that" but they're the exception.

Lanning inherited a good roster but needed to completely overhaul it for his desired team. And Cignetti just transferred over a ton of guys from his previous team and did an instant rebuild which is incredible. Still want to see the Hoosiers lose... But I can respect what he's done.

Most coaches can't turn around and put together a winning team in year one.

First round game at Autzen. Get those injured guys back on the field and warmed up for a good run.

A month off with a bye is a LONG time and for someone like Dak who has missed all of November his last game would have been 2 months ago at that point and now it's against a team that had a warm up game.

Let's have the warm up. Especially if we are the no. 5 seed and will probably need to go throw Ohio State to reach the championship game.

2 hours ago, Charles Fischer said:

Some of his throws were crazy accurate, and his passing percentage is hurt by at least four drops by the receivers. (20-29)

Sadiq did not have a good day.

The pass end zone TD pass that he caught out of bounds was a slightly off target throw by Moore.

But Sadiq had several passes in his hands that he dropped that would have been for good gains.

Also... McClellan had a catch that wasn't. Or a PI that wasn't called.

Moore felt off for a lot of that game but it wasn't completely his fault. A few more completed balls and he might have found that rhythm.

The Chip Kelly record is going to be tough to beat... But I believe Dan can do it!

Chip just left at his peak.

I mean... Puddles is a better name.

But I still love The Duck.

5 hours ago, Santa Rosa Duck said:

Jeremiah McClellan made one of the best catches I have ever seen. Unfortunately he and we was robbed!

And to make it a bit worse... his left arm was being completely held by the Washington player. Where's the PI flag for that?

Should have been a catch or a flag.

I'll give the Huskies a compliment...

That was a fantastic punt by Williams!

14 minutes ago, OregonDucks said:

I didn’t understand that either. It would have forced UW to use their TOs earlier or call the offense differently.

Hopefully someone asks Coach Lanning about it post game.

He had faith his defense gets off the field and wanted time for th offense.

14 minutes ago, OregonDucks said:

I didn’t understand that either. It would have forced UW to use their TOs earlier or call the offense differently.

Hopefully someone asks Coach Lanning about it post game.

He had faith his defense gets off the field and wanted time for th offense.

Anyone else feeling annoyed how there are no calls when players hold Oregon players but if Oregon holds we get flagged?

I am also aware that Oregon got away with a couple holds today as well.

I also saw a facemask from a Washington against an Oregon player that went unflagged.

Washington isn't letting Oregon get the chunk yardage on the ground we're used to but Oregon is still getting positive yards per carry. So need to keep the Huskies honest.

Getting Moore's legs in on the game in a safe way has been good so far. Another way to open up the ground game.

1 minute ago, Triphibius said:

But not into an 8-man box, please.

I also wouldn't mind some screen passes. I know a lot of people hate them but we need some chunk yards.

Also that missed pass to Hill should have been better but we could have ran it for 3 yards to keep that drive alive.

Feels like we are getting too cute right now.

Run the fracking ball!!!!

A 24 team playoff...

Frankly I hate it.

But this is one of those things that will move on with or without Dan support because at the end of the day we are all tied to our teams and we'll at least follow things for our team's sake.

Just looking at this year's rankings so far I feel there are a lot of teams in the Big 12 that are not good enough to make the playoff but have received a ton of hype so far. The Big 12 isn't what it used to be and the ACC is pretty weak as well.

As for the B1G and SEC any team that gets three losses on their record isn't in the top tier of the conference.

But I suppose more games, even games with sacrificial lambs, make money so I'm sure this will happen.

College football has leveled out in the transfer portal and NIL era. I mean... Indiana, need I say more? So the playoff expansion is warranted and 12 feels probably about right and 16 is pushing it but has merits based on fairness, everyone plays a first round game.

But 24? Just make another tournament like the NIT... A lower bracket tournament for the rest of the spread of teams. Maybe a conference that isn't the B1G or SEC might actually win it.

Might be a better and more exciting tournament honestly.

1 hour ago, mikethehiker said:

It’s a beauty contest right now between Oregon and Texas Tech for #3.

And we're on the West coast...

So I guess that goes to Texas Tech.

36 minutes ago, Solar said:

Wouldn't it be fun to see a team like Utah inexplicably knock off a team like Georgia from time to time and make little Cinderella run?

That would be fun....

But I don't think that would ever really happen. There is a still a massive talent gap between the top and the bottom. Especially when it comes to the end of a season.

I mean in the 2022 Rosebowl Utah went up against Ohio State which had some of their biggest players sit out for the draft... And lost. Yes they lost their star QB but I don't think that would have made a difference in terms of the final result... Maybe the score board would have looked nicer but OSU would have gotten the win regardless.