I do this once in a while, and tells you the overall quality of your class when your numbers are fewer.

 

Pac-12 Recruiting: Ranking teams by Commitments' Average Talent Rating After Signing Day by Zachary Neel of Ducks Wire

 

However you look at it, Washington is bad. 

Quality matters more than quantity?  Hmmm.  
 

What does it look like when the two measures are factored?

1.  Stanford (4x1=4)

2.  Oregon (2x3=6)

3.  USC (1x10=10)
4.  Arizona (6x2=12)
5.  Utah (5x4=20)

6.  UCLA (3x7=21)
7.  OSU (8x6=48)
8.  Colorado (10x5 =50)
9.  Cal (7x8=56)
10. UW (9x11=99)

11. WSU (9x12=108)

12. ASU (11x12=132)

 

Looks like we beat the Huskies and Trojans overall, but lose to the darn Trees again.

 

Edited February 3, 20223 yr by Duck1984

On 2/3/2022 at 10:58 AM, Washington Waddler said:

     When fans turn into cpas it just gets weird. Don’t want these people doing my taxes.

I would....Oregon always wins!  🤓

I’d rather have a small quality class this year then let this grade a recruiting team go pedal to the metal next year.

On 2/3/2022 at 10:45 AM, 30Duck said:

However you look at it, Washington is bad. 

This made me smile.

 

Also, I would like to see something similar to this based off of the transfer players. I wonder where each team would sit. USC prolly wouldn't change spots. 

 

I believe it's hard to rank transfers. Do you use their HS * or ??? And how would that work?

Great post, thank you. Shows the quality over the quantity. 

On 2/3/2022 at 2:08 PM, Duck 1972 said:

I believe it's hard to rank transfers. Do you use their HS * or ??? And how would that work?

 

I believe it is 247 Sports that has such a ranking? Jon Wilner reported last week that the combined recruit/portal ranking would have SC's class, after signing Caleb Williams, at No. 9 in the nation. Do you know if Oregon has any more scholarships open for guys from the portal? Can go to 92 this year if guys have portaled out. Lots of guys in the portal and after spring ball you can bet there will be a lot more.