fred flintstone

Who wants to play for an offensive genius that is a moron. He just got the program put on probation for a year..... The recruiting class is going to fall apart.....and it was not great to begin with.

No.......the powers want to retain him.

It will be in the 50's for the game......hardly a test.

The only change that will help USC is changing the head coach. He is a complete overpaid failed hire. Another dud brought on by the lofty pretentious overpaid USC admin staff that can't seem to figure out whether a guy can coach.

USC hired a head coach that does not like people.......does that sound like someone who can recruit successfully. or can build a good program. From the Duck's point of view, hopefully it will take the boneheads at least two more years to figure it out. While they blame it on cash, the portal. tactics....etc.

No worries........winners win.......and Oregon will win again.......Georgia is the team to beat. Aside from that play them one at a time.

USC will suck for years to come.

70 million left after this year.....its going to be a while.

USC will be no threat to Oregon or other elite teams for many years to come. I suspect Riley will be at USC for a minimum of 2 more years due to admin politics and then the need to upgrade players takes a minimum of 2 years when the barn is nearly empty. The real issue at USC is not directly about the team, it's about athletic directors that are incompetent.

I suspect that due to the ability of players to quit mid season and transfer at will that teams that can recruit 5 star talent will literally fire lesser talent to make room. In the past this was done rarely because teams wanted to foster loyalty. With the new era, loyalty may be a relic. It's perform or else.

He has left the team. An airhead.

Boise will probably make the playoffs if the Ducks make it. Their only loss being the Ducks. That was no cupcake.

Oregon is ranked about right and most folks know it......its entire season revolves around the Ohio State and Michigan games, assuming they beat everybody else. Win those two games and the ranking will be top 3. Lose both and top 20. Win one and lose the other......top 10. Everything else is noise. As far as USC......LSU did what Kelly always does....lose the opener. He is an OK coach but not elite. The game plan was bad. They did not throw it long against a questionable USC backfield. Just about every pass was short to intermediate and to the sidelines with little chance for yards after the catch. In their hope to control the ball they crushed any big play opportunities. His QB has demonstrated he has an above average arm and they have good receivers, with two NFL tackles. More worried about interceptions than winning the game. So considering this win......USC belongs in the top 20 not the top 10. I suspect they may end up with a good season....but they don't play Oregon, Ohio St or Iowa.....and Penn St is at home. The only other tests are Notre Dame at home and a Michigan team that has a QB problem.

USC will learn all about its defense when it plays LSU in their first game. LSU has one of the best offenses in football this year. I suspect LSU will hang 40 plus on them.

Why is he being so pessimistic