17 hours ago17 hr No. The NBA has a way of choosing the worst branch at each point in the strategic decision tree.
3 hours ago3 hr No. Agree with most of what’s in this thread, BUT, in almost every professional sports league, a sub .500 team can make the playoffs.
2 hours ago2 hr Moderator No. The NBA game has morphed over the years, but I am still a fan. Just like most sports, it is a lot more entertaining to be at games. Had Blazer season tickets for almost 30 years, and it can be raucous, intense, and provide plenty of drama. Playoff basketball magnifies that experience. On TV…not so much.
1 hour ago1 hr No. I have not watched an NBA game in years, but follow from a far distance. I will not watch until home teams wear white uniforms again and these sissy's quit sitting out games and tanking. What a rip-off for the fans! The play-in for the last two playoff spots in each conference (usually with sub .500 teams) is absolutely ridiculous and the first round should have stayed at best of five. The Trailblazers will never lure a star to Portland to win a title. And the tattoos...it's all just unwatchable. Yes, I'm fun at parties 🤣
1 hour ago1 hr No. The NBA made a rule, if you didn't play 66 games, you weren't eligible for awards. This can be a huge difference in salary. This was supposed to entice star players to play more games.The NBA allowed for extraordinary circumstances to allow Luka Doncic and Cade Cunningham to be eligible, even though they didn't reach the required 66 games. Reduce the number of games from 82 to 72(?), this would eliminate back to back games and would reduce the workload for players, to hopefully get them to play more games. Of course, TV money says no. Less supply.
Create an account or sign in to comment