Jon Joseph No. 1 Share Posted March 2, 2023 This is a problem for the entire "Power 3." College football realignment -- Inside ACC's big money battle WWW.ESPN.COM With ACC powers Florida State and Clemson making more noise about a revenue gap with the SEC and Big Ten, realignment rumors are running rampant despite a long-term TV deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Joseph Author No. 2 Share Posted March 2, 2023 "FishBaitSolutions?" Does Charles have a Trademark case? 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Joseph Author No. 3 Share Posted March 2, 2023 On 3/2/2023 at 1:32 PM, Jon Joseph said: This is a problem for the entire "Power 3." College football realignment -- Inside ACC's big money battle WWW.ESPN.COM With ACC powers Florida State and Clemson making more noise about a revenue gap with the SEC and Big Ten, realignment rumors are running rampant despite a long-term TV deal. FYI - Prior to CU and Utah joining the conference the Pac-10 had unequal revenue sharing. Larry took the Pac-12 to equal revenue sharing. Being academia the vote to go to equal shares was unanimous but USC made it clear at the time that it was not happy with receiving an equal share. Had the Pac-10 distribution remainded in place perhaps SC/UCLA would have stayed in the conference. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Fischer Administrator No. 4 Share Posted March 2, 2023 On 3/2/2023 at 12:36 PM, Jon Joseph said: Had the Pac-10 distribution remained in place perhaps SC/UCLA would have stayed in the conference. The damage by Larry upon us is so vast--unbelievable. 1 1 2 Mr. FishDuck Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Joseph Author No. 5 Share Posted March 3, 2023 I'm surprised that Oregon among other teams did not object to a Mountain West team, Utah, joining the conference as an equal share member. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven A Moderator No. 6 Share Posted March 3, 2023 On 3/3/2023 at 7:48 AM, Jon Joseph said: joining the conference as an equal share member. I'm pretty sure it was a few years before they reached that status, or am I thinking of the AZ schools? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDuck No. 7 Share Posted March 3, 2023 Remember, the source of revenue in revenue sharing has changed over the years. For much of the Pac's history revenue was the proceeds from the gate. WSU got half the net when they played in the Coliseum, U$C got half when they visited Martin Stadium. Obviously WSU got the best of that deal. I think that changed about the time Arizona/ASU joined. At one point revenue from the rare TV appearance was split 55% to the televised team, 45% split among the conference members. League media rights prior to Colorado and Utah joining were about $6 million per school. With expansion and a new media deal the league total jumped to the $170 million range so even with equal shares schools doubled their media income. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tandaian No. 8 Share Posted March 3, 2023 It took 3-5 years for Utah to get equal share. It wasn't immediate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDuck No. 9 Share Posted March 3, 2023 On 3/3/2023 at 1:46 PM, Tandaian said: It took 3-5 years for Utah to get equal share. It wasn't immediate. SOON TO BE EVEN: In Oregon, Cliff Kirkpatrick reports revenue sharing "will be equal for the first time starting in the 2012-13 academic calendar year, after the conference renegotiates its television contract." Pac-10 Unveils Division, Title Game, Equal Revenue Sharing Plans WWW.SPORTSBUSINESSJOURNAL.COM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
