Mike West

Requires he work on his footwork moving forward. If you anticipate constant pressure, you have to set your feet as you plant your last step moving backwards. In other words, as he takes his last step, he'll have to firmly plant his back foot and throw immediately - in one motion. That requires muscle memory, so he's going to have to practice that relentlessly. It's a one motion move...plant and throw. Literally the whole process is one continuous motion So THEN, he has to create that rhythm for every type of throw: the fade; the post; the seam; the out route; the dig route; the checdowm. THEN, He has to create that motion for every one of his receivers, from TB to TE to WR. He's got his work cut out for him, but he must be prepared to make those kind of throws. Or/And as I suggested after week one, Max Protect formations, Bootlegs and Rollout plays must be designed. Why waste time doing the same thing when you're getting the same results?

I refused to watch the game. First minute of the game confirmed my suspicions. Watched the progress on ESPN Gamecast though. This team does not have an identity yet. Since the OL issues seem to be a fundamental flaw, I hope Stein starts using checkdowns and designed passes for the RBs - they need the touches and they're too talented to waste on a porous OL. I still don't like the defensive formation. It doesn't suit the talent in my very "HACK" opinion. They are going to be the unit that wins games this year. Besides, our guys don't physically look like the Georgias and Ohio States of the world ( and don't play like them either). This seems like a watered down version of the 2022 offense with a hybrid 23' and 24 defense. We have a damn good coach. I'm concerned recruiting will suffer based on this performance to date. We desperately need Bubbas on the OL and DL to deal with the elite. The Elite are going to sell the bad location with the narrative that Oregon is hype, not substance in my opinion. Winning ten would diffuse some of that, but it's an issue until it isn't. We are a similar version of Penn State at present. And guess what: we won't be laughing at UW and USC anymore. They may end up laughing at us. Again, we had it coming. I believe -especially the grey beards- that we should ALWAYS remember we used to be Oregon State caliber. We've been very fortunate. We take that for granted way too much I certainly hope we are patient with Lanning like we were with Rich Brooks. I think Lanning will evolve into developing the low four stars into a pesky team the elite will always have to watch out for. We're a Tier TWO program until we win a Natty. That's how the college football world is going to look at us moving forward. I hope everyone loves OBD as much as I do and sees this through. We are a pretty good program. We will have to fight like our life depends on it to grow into an elite program. Love the journey. It's a process that makes it worth the pursuit of excellence. Boy ..I sure can preach and babble!!!

I really don't have to babble this week... The Idaho game adjusted my expectations. This game provided some insights: 1. The team totally bit on the hype 2. The players aren't cohesive yet - they don't really know who they are 3. The schedule has been a huge friend 4. This team will earn EVERY damn one of their victories. How many wins? TBD

That was the worst $100 I've ever earned in my entire life. Should have bet the farm...

Oregon 38-24 Oregon created 1 turnover Oregon generates 1 sack 225 Oregon passing yards

I truly love the throwbacks. But once the traditional colors came back, I've been worried it's looks boring. I prefer the wings and the O on the back and I love the forest green with the chrome helmets. I'm not too keen on the black or grey, but they're ' spicy '. If we go to the playoffs, the only divergence I want to see from traditional is the forest green and eggshells. But I agree with you, variety adds more flair to our brand.

Jon, I'm hoping I look like a fool this week. Losing a small chunk of change doesn't really matter to me.

Oh I know that Charles. My first impulse was to argue your point. But the snapshots left no doubt. It's ok. I put money on BSU to cover the spread before the article. Its been pretty obvious how I've felt about the team - and the comments this week. I put my money where my mouth is. A three TD victory is going to require an astounding performance this week. I'll believe it when I see it. And I will be glad to lose that money.

I understand what you were trying to say. And I am not saying what I want to say because people will take it as hyperbole. I have serious concerns about this team and our expectations of it. I'll leave it at that because I'm sure if you've read my posts lately, I've been pretty emphatic about my feelings. I've watched way too much football to ignore what I saw last Saturday and this Spring. And FishDuck, raised my concerns further without intending to this morning. So forgive me if I'm upset that fans are picking on USC fans. And Husky fans for that matter. If OBD don't start playing well, we are going to get trolled mercilessly. And we'll deserve it.

I guess I have to nitpick. Three of the four 4th down calls in Seattle were poor execution. All three of those plays a receiver was open. All that was necessary was simply completing a pass. Chip's 2010 team was the only Oregon team that executed well enough to play any championship team from any modern era and play to the wire. Lanning's teams have not played to that level. That is the only reason those fourth down calls have been unsuccessful. If OBD are going to win a Natty, they need to not only execute on fourth down, they need to execute in most clutch situations. That is the flaw in Lanning's teams: clutch performance. So perhaps you're correct. Until this team demonstrates it is a high performing team, he should not go for it on fourth down. That is the lesson to take, because frankly- the play calls have been on point.

The lineman that would have led an explosive play down-field fell down. What coach can game plan that? If you want to keep the ball, and you have a MASSIVE physical advantage, take the shot. That's entirely on the players. They weren't playing so bad, that you lose total confidence in them. I'm about putting an inferior opponent down. Especially when I have a huge physical advantage. I'm not going to back down because an inferior team might score a TD off the poor execution. My team is good enough (and they proved it) to overcome an execution problem like that. Again, I will never fault Lanning for making a decision like that. Especially since he calls plays the team can and should execute. The decision is to put an end to the nonsense, instead of playing the percentages-which can be construed as playing not to lose. Like playing prevent defense. I want to win. There is no reason to believe Idaho would not have scored anyway after the punt. They scored TDs on back to back drives. And the first one was ANOTHER example of poor execution as the CB was caught looking at the QB instead of covering the guy right in front of him-who scored the TD. You know my pet peeve about that mistake - which happened exactly the same way in Seattle. Chy, these players must take control of the game themselves. They have been given more than the tools. You wrote an article about it this morning. They need to execute. Coaching is bit the problem right now. Not one but. The players were given plays to dominate, and they didn't. It's plain and simple. And you proved it this morning.

Nice demonstration Charles. Indeed that is a question to ponder. I wonder how much of this was brought up. He still played well. But he left A LOT of food on the table.

LSU going 4-8 is tremendously better than Idaho going 11-1. We're talking about an SEC team. That would bury Idaho is fifteen seconds. I can't say what I really want to say, so I'll say this instead - comparing a team ranked below 126 to a top 20 team before Sunday is like saying a Praying Mantis is more dangerous than a Grizzly Bear. Not to mention, I don't see ANYBODY challenging USC to a matchup next week. I'll say this until people can't stand me anymore: USuc and the Fuskies playing well is damn good for us. We're supposedly better than both, right? The better their respective records are, the better it is for OBD. Rise to the challenge and quit begging for their demise. Champions don't want wimpy competition. They want to prove they're the best.

I'm sure Lanning drilled them off camera. But the public message is key as well. We should always strive to learn. Especially from wins. Because what you didn't do that you should do must be the focus. Love our coach. He chided his team, showed tough love, and encouraged them after a very disappointing performance. It's up to the players. They have the right coach.

The only thing that matters is their offense looked way better than ours. So did USC:s (against much better competition at that). We are in the here and now. Florida State lost last night. We look about as good as they do at present. If we lose, you damn well bet they will troll us endlessly. They're winning. Winning matters.

I sure hope you're correct.

Does anyone ever watch Josh Pate? I'm interested in what people think of his views. Thought he was on point about the overall scene. I recommend checking him out.

Do you feel Nix might have avoided those sacks? I saw way too much Havoc from Idaho for my comfort. And since OBD didn't control the LOS on runs, play action will be less effective if the OL doesn't improve. It's why I suggest slowly implementing max protect, Bootlegs and Rollout packages, 22 and 21 sets. And Gabriel has to be part of the running game. It's early. But what do you think? Is this a fundamental issue, or is it fixable? I don't know if you saw Georgia, Texas, Miami and Bama. They look miles ahead of us. Frankly, this is no time to just apply the standard. It's also time for some creative adjustments to deal with our weaknesses ( that is if you believe we have them). And Georgia still has an advantage of adjusting to havoc and physicality better than everyone else. Implementing contingency strategies to overcome shortfalls is what I call elite coaching. If you can't out muscle them, you better make them think about what they're doing. Idaho did that to us, stayed in the game and climbed back in it. That's damn good coaching right there. What day you FishDuck?

One other observation, I believe the OL is better at blocking 1-on-1. They are big and strong enough to pile drive anybody in my opinion, and they're good at it Which means the TEs are the key to motion blocking ( from my perspective). As H Backs, the TEs can handle pulling to clear space. I'm going overboard here, but I truly see a flaw that won't be fixed by "fundamental training". It's like Dak Prescott for Dallas ( he can get you to the playoffs, but he's not winning a Superbowl). This is a case of you deal with the cards you have. Fold em properly, hold em properly, and run away from your weaknesses. Again, I hope I'm totally incorrect. But I see this as a big picture issue. A forty thousand foot view.

Really good observation. Overall, Gabriel took the efficiency route. Especially early. Later, when he did look down-field he didn't have time The Drive before OBD closed out the game with a TD, Gabriel missed a skinny post for a TD inside the Fifteen yard line on third down- which resulted in a FG. He didn't even scan the field- he knew what was going to be open on the opposite and took the "cheap" win. His "clock" is faster though. In my opinion, he isn't going to have enough time to look backside, and go through his entire progression. The good news is Stein knows how to get anybody open. I even saw a copy of what Georgia uses to spring their TEs open. And that play is designed to get SOMEBODY open- it forces a conflict decision in the secondary. I'm concerned that even a healthy OL won't do. I'm hoping Stein has sequential plays to Bubble Screens like Arroyo had , and Hitch and Go plays to exploit aggressive LBs and CBs. I'm also hoping several versions of Screens to the RBs and MAX PROTECT blocking packages become a strategy moving forward. I truly believe the OL situation is permanent. I do not believe this OL is capable of handling the Elite teams we would face in the playoffs. They're not athletic enough.

Here's my opinion: The 2021 OL that beat Ohio State can beat any defense against the run. The 2022 OL was better. They opened holes all day versus UGA, and actually had better pass protection against the Bulldogs. We would have shredded the Fuskies last year with either of those OLs because we had the WRs we were missing in both games against elite teams and Will Stein's imaginative system. That's the cruel joke right now. This year's OL does not match the talent level of those two years. I personally would use lots of Bootleg and Rollout when passing, and two back sets (either 21 or 22 sets) when running the ball. In the 12 set, Gabriel must be a feature runner. I don't see this OL unit as elite enough to handle the likes of last year's Michigan, Georgia, Clemson, Ohio State, Alabama, Penn State, or gulp... this year's Miami. I can't remember who it was that said Gabriel doesn't have pocket presence ( after the Spring Game). He absolutely does. Yesterday proved the Spring Game wasn't an isolated situation. Gabriel realistically will have two seconds to throw the ball against the nation's best Front Seven Groups. That's not enough time to unleash an explosive down field passing attack. Worse this OL unit isn't effective enough to sell play action either. This is solely my opinion. The Defense MUST win games this year. My problem with that is I don't believe the system is suitable because the alignments always leave the edge open to exploit. The Fuskies proved that last year, and I would personally develop a running attack to directly exploit that "weakness". If I see it, the nation's best do. I REALLY HOPE I'M WRONG. That is what I'm seeing though.

Idaho outplayed OBD today. We don't have an athletic OL this year. That could be a problem long term. It's the first game. Doesn't decide the season. We are definitely not the third best team, and we sure aren't That Team Out West. Even if Idaho wins the FCS title, they sure lowered my expectations of OBD this year.

Nice article David. My take is the pivotal moment was the Texas Tech game. They proved to themselves in the Texas Tech game that they could handle playing poorly ( and still find a way to win). The players KNEW they blew it in Seattle. I could tell by the way they played the rest of the season. They weren't going to beat themselves again. That is why the Las Vegas game stayed close. They never gave up, despite being OUTPLAYED. The Fuskies were better than us. Dan Lanning gave his players four cracks at executing to win in Seattle. Three of those plays required simple execution - three times Bo Nix forced passes instead of being his usual self. Nix isn't terrible, he just didn't execute. Evan Williams ran right past an interception to seal the Seattle game. Because he was looking at Penix instead of shutting down that fade route. Hence he lost where the receiver was, and was out of position to make a play he would have made had he locked onto the receiver instead of eyeballing Penix. Dan Lanning should not be blamed for plays his players normally execute. Especially when he set them up to succeed. Dan Lanning should get credit for putting his players-truly incapable of winning the Natty last year- in position to win a Natty. They are loaded this year. Still not as talented on paper like Ohio State and Georgia. If they play intense ball start to finish, they can beat both teams. But they will need to execute, and force mistakes. That is what separates us from "them". Execution. It's not the size of the dog in the fight now. It's the size of the fight in the dog. Win the Day Fast Hard Finish. More apt than ever before.

This is a very big reason why I wouldn't pay too much NIL to a freshman QB ( or any Five-Star player for that matter). Falls under potential can get you fired category. I watched ESPN this morning for the first time in months. Two NFL WR standouts are holding out for money. ESPN feeds the greed machine by saying they deserve it ( to a degree they do, but honor your damn contract, and NFL owners, pony up bonuses for an outstanding year besides the contract). I seriously hope college football avoids an NFL style collective bargaining agreement. It's bad enough unproven kids are getting nearly a million in NIL packages. I've heard the transfer portal is going to become much more of a bargaining chip twice a year from now on. Yuck.

Had to, as it turned racial. Stupidity knows no race, gender or ethnic boundaries. Not sure its turning racial like that, but I do agree with your quote. Deion Sanders is butchering opportunities for black men that share his socio-economic roots. It's difficult enough for black coaches to get head coaching jobs in football (college and the NFL). It's safe to say his status has become more of a reason Colorado hired him because no black man would get hired acting like he has the past 9 to 12 months. It's bad enough trying to trust men like this in the black community. Sanders tried to improve the status and reputation of HBCUs. Now he's making a fool out of himself and justifying a whole bunch of prejudiced people that it makes no sense to hire black coaches. When I hear Systemic Racism, I think of this. I've grown up with too many black men that act exactly like Sanders, then want to claim they fail because white people won't give a black man an opportunity. When Sanders fails (and he will), it will be because he didn't look past himself and his blackness and join the World Class, Worldwide standard of excellence. It sucks, because he KNOWS what hard work, sacrifice, dedication, and relentless pursuit of excellence looks like. That's not enough. You can be black and still raise the bar to what any race considers world class professionalism. He refused to do that, and now others like him will face the question of 'will they raise their blackness to world class status". This isn't a race thing. This is way more than that.