NJDuck

Here is that article you all were mentioning: College Football Analyst Suggests Caleb Williams Should Sit Out Rest Of USC's Season With their loss to Utah, the USC Trojans have been knocked out of playoff contention https://athlonsports.com/college-football/college-football-analyst-suggests-caleb-williams-should-sit-out-rest-of-uscs-season

Wiltfong Whiparound: Florida and FSU land big commitments; Alabama, Ohio State and Oregon host key targets The latest on many of the nation's top targets. Wiltfong Whiparound: Florida and FSU land big commitments; Alabama, Ohio State and Oregon host key targets 247SPORTS.COM The latest on many of the nation's top targets.

No. 8 Oregon, No. 13 Utah clash in likely elimination match Both teams are 6-1 overall and 3-1 in the Pac-12. The team that loses falls out of national championship consideration. “Big game in the conference picture,” Utes coach Kyle Whittingham said his Monday news conference. “They’re a one-loss team, as are we. Both our backs are to the wall. Hopefully it will be a great football game.” Utah’s lone blemish is a 21-7 defeat at then-No. 19 Oregon State on Sept. 29. The Ducks lost 36-33 at then-No. 7 Washington in a battle of unbeatens on Oct. 14. Oregon coach Dan Lanning shares Whittingham’s view that it’s a must-win game. No. 8 Oregon, No. 13 Utah clash in likely elimination match SPORTSNAUT.COM It is a virtual elimination game Saturday when No. 8 Oregon faces No. 13 Utah in Salt Lake City.

Know the Foe: Five Utah players to know This will be a weekly feature published each week and one of three weekly "Know the Foe" stories" per game week. Know the Foe: Five Utah players to know 247SPORTS.COM This will be a weekly feature published each week and one of three weekly "Know the Foe" stories" per game week.

Ducks open as early betting favorites heading into top-15 showdown against Utah It's still nearly a week away, but the betting line is live for Oregon vs. Utah in its week nine matchup. Ducks open as early betting favorites heading into top-15 showdown against Utah 247SPORTS.COM It's still nearly a week away, but the betting line is live for Oregon vs. Utah in its week nine matchup.

Top guest picker candidates for 'College GameDay' between No. 8 Oregon and No. 13 Utah Top picker candidates for ‘College GameDay’ between Oregon and Utah DUCKSWIRE.USATODAY.COM Top guest picker candidates for ‘College GameDay’ between No. 8 Oregon and No. 13 Utah

Agree with Log Haulin in OC growth. Do we need growth/expantion in Will Stein's play-calling? Has it become too predictable, especially in first quarter and red zone production? Oregon's first quarter points in 2023 ranks 6th, 10.5 points. But, in the last three games 3.7 points. "Oregon’s offense continues to rank in the top 10 in every meaningful statistic, except inside the red zone." "Statistically speaking, the Ducks lead's the country in total offense and are second in scoring and top the Pac-12 in rushing, pass efficiency, third down and sacks allowed. Yet when they get inside the 20-yard line the Ducks drop to 51st (86.5%)." "UO’s touchdown percentage in the red zone (72.97%) ranks 20th, but against five Power Five teams it’s 34th (65.38%)." "Usually the top offenses in the country over the past several years typically also rank highly in red zone scoring. In 2022, Tennessee led the country in total offense and was third in red zone scoring. Ohio State was 12th in red zone scoring but 45th in touchdown percentage in 2021. LSU was 2nd in red zone scoring in 2019 and Oklahoma was 9th in 2018." "Defensively, Oregon’s pass defense has gone from 5th nationally after five games to 56th following back-to-back games against the top two passing offenses in the country." But on the positive note, if Khyree Jackson can come back from the off the injury list, pass defense will be elevated. Having a healthy Jestin Jacobs in the line-up in LB position will only improve our defensive production overall. Just things to ponder. Statistically speaking: Oregon football’s offense leads Pac-12, except in red zone WWW.OREGONLIVE.COM The Ducks lead the country in total offense and are second in scoring, yet inside the 20-yard line they drop to 51st.

College Football Fans Calling for Lincoln Riley To Leave USC For NFL After Latest Loss Utah has now beaten USC in four-straight meetings https://athlonsports.com/college-football/college-football-fans-calling-for-lincoln-riley-to-leave-usc-for-nfl-after-latest-loss Lincoln Riley says he plans to stay at USC for 'long time,' explains disappointing skid Rumors circulated this week that Riley would leave USC to coach in the NFL in the future. Lincoln Riley says he plans to stay at USC for 'long time,' explains disappointing skid 247SPORTS.COM Rumors circulated this week that Riley would leave USC to coach in the NFL in the future.

College GameDay announces Week 9 location College GameDay announces Week 9 location SATURDAYTRADITION.COM College Gameday has revealed its Week 9 location.

Statistically speaking: Oregon football’s offense leads Pac-12, except in red zone Oregon’s offense continues to rank in the top 10 in every meaningful statistic, except inside the red zone. The No. 9 Ducks (5-1, 3-1 Pac-12) lead the country in total offense and are second in scoring and top the Pac-12 in rushing, pass efficiency, third down and sacks allowed. Yet when they get inside the 20-yard line the Ducks drop to 51st (86.5%). UO’s touchdown percentage in the red zone (72.97%) ranks 20th, but against five Power Five teams it’s 34th (65.38%). Not surprisingly, the top offenses in the country over the past several years typically also rank highly in red zone scoring. In 2022, Tennessee led the country in total offense and was third in red zone scoring. Ohio State was 12th in red zone scoring but 45th in touchdown percentage in 2021. LSU was 2nd in red zone scoring in 2019 and Oklahoma was 9th in 2018. Defensively, Oregon’s pass defense has gone from 5th nationally after five games to 56th following back-to-back games against the top two passing offenses in the country. Here is where Oregon ranked in the Pac-12 and nationally after Week 8: OFFENSE DEFENSE SPECIAL TEAMS RUSHING OFFENSE 2013: 273.5 (1st, 9th) 2014: 234.5 (1st, 20th) 2015: 279.9 (1st, 5th) 2016: 226.4 (2nd, 27th) 2017: 251.0 (2nd, 12th) 2018: 179.4 (4th, 54th) 2019: 174.9 (2nd, 51st) 2020: 166.7 (7th, 61st) 2021: 202.4 (4th, 24th) 2022: 215.8 (3rd, 12th) After Portland State:348 (2nd, 5th) After Texas Tech:219.5 (3rd, 23rd) After Hawaii: 229.3 (3rd, 11th) After Colorado:232.0 (1st, 7th) After Stanford: 227.2 (1st, 6th) After bye: 227.2 (1st, 8th) After Washington:221.7 (1st, 8th) After Washington State: 225.4 (1st, 6th) Why: Oregon ran for 248 yards and 3 touchdowns on 32 carries RUSHING DEFENSE 2013: 165.5 (6th, 66th) 2014: 165.4 (10th, 60th) 2015: 178.8 (6th, 73rd) 2016: 246.5 (11th, 121st) 2017: 128.5 (2nd, 25th) 2018: 144.3 (5th, 43rd) 2019: 108.9 (2nd, 13th) 2020: 169.6 (7th, 70th) 2021: 144.1 (6th, 53rd) 2022: 124.8 (4th, 30th) After Portland State: 148 (11th, 91st) After Texas Tech: 161 (11th, 102nd) After Hawaii: 127 (10th, 70th) After Colorado: 105.2 (5th, 32nd) After Stanford: 102.0 (6th, 26th) After bye: 102.0 (4th, 20th) After Washington: 101.5 (4th, 16th) After Washington State: 95.1 (3rd, 11th) Why: Washington State ran for 57 yards and 1 touchdown on 22 carries NET PUNTING 2013: 38.49 (3rd, 27th) 2014: 36.40 (8th, 82nd) 2015: 31.85 (12th, 126th) 2016: 34.68 (11th, 113th) 2017: 34.35 (11th, 123rd) 2018: 36.85 (10th, 83rd) 2019: 38.50 (7th, 63rd) 2020: 39.36 (4th, 49th) 2021: 37.13 (11th, 103rd) 2022: 35.69 (11th, 117th) After Portland State: 58 (1st, 1st) After Texas Tech: 37.8 (7th, 87th) After Hawaii: 39.86 (5th, 57th) After Colorado: 41.44 (3rd, 34th) After Stanford: 43.09 (2nd, 13th) After bye: 43.09 (2nd, 13th) After Washington: 43.88 (1st, 6th) After Washington State: 42.5 (1st, 12th) Why: Ross James had 2 punts averaging 39 yards and Bo Nix had a 37-yard punt PASSING OFFENSE 2013: 291.5 (4th, 21st) 2014: 312.5 (3rd, 10th) 2015: 258.3 (7th, 36th) 2016: 265.3 (5th, 31st) 2017: 189.9 (10th, 94th) 2018: 247.8 (7th, 49th) 2019: 258.2 (5th, 41st) 2020: 248.1 (4th, 47th) 2021: 221.3 (7th, 76th) 2022: 284.8 (4th, 17th) After Portland State:381 (5th, 11th) After Texas Tech:370 (4th, 7th) After Hawaii: 357.7 (5th, 7th) After Colorado:338.8 (5th, 9th) After Stanford: 330.6 (5th, 11th) After bye: 330.6 (5th, 10th) After Washington:331.7 (5th, 9th) After Washington State: 326.1 (4th, 8th) Why: Bo Nix threw for 293 yards and 2 touchdowns PASSING DEFENSE 2013: 204.5 (1st, 21st) 2014: 264.3 (7th, 108th) 2015: 306.5 (11th, 125th) 2016: 271.9 (10th, 113th) 2017: 240.6 (8th, 89th) 2018: 241.6 (8th, 82nd) 2019: 220.1 (2nd, 53rd) 2020: 236.3 (7th, 66th) 2021: 241.4 (8th, 88th) 2022: 256.4 (6th, 102nd) After Portland State: 52 (1st, 5th) After Texas Tech: 167 (3rd, 33rd) After Hawaii: 158.7 (1st, 15th) After Colorado: 158.8 (1st, 9th) After Stanford: 153.6 (1st, 8th) After bye: 153.6 (1st, 5th) After Washington: 180.7 (1st, 17th) After Washington State: 217.4 (2nd, 56th) Why: Cameron Ward threw for 438 yards and 1 touchdown KICK RETURNS 2013: 21.69 (5th, 59th) 2014: 19.69 (11th, 92nd) 2015: 25.16 (1st, 15th) 2016: 23.67 (1st, 16th) 2017: 22.73 (3rd, 29th) 2018: 20.18 (7th, 70th) 2019: 26.28 (2nd, 8th) 2020: 19.23 (8th, 84th) 2021: 22.53 (6th, 45th) 2022: 18.81 (8th, 89th) After Portland State: n/a (n/a) After Texas Tech: 18.5 (6th, 81st) After Hawaii: 11.75 (12th, 125th) After Colorado: 14.20 (11th, 119th) After Stanford: 15.17 (11th, 118th) After bye: 15.17 (11th, 120th) After Washington: 15.88 (11th, 115th) After Washington State: 13.3 (11th, 128th) Why: Patrick Herbert had a 6-yard return and Jordan James had a return for no yards PASS EFFICIENCY OFFENSE 2013: 164.91 (1st, 5th) 2014: 180.78 (1st, 1st) 2015: 161.86 (2nd, 9th) 2016: 151.57 (2nd, 19th) 2017: 143.34 (4th, 32nd) 2018: 142.67 (4th, 44th) 2019: 158.11 (3rd, 13th) 2020: 158.76 (1st, 14th) 2021: 138.84 (6th, 62nd) 2022: 162.03 (2nd, 5th) After Portland State:205.8 (3rd, 15th) After Texas Tech:179.22 (5th, 20th) After Hawaii: 184.6 (3rd, 9th) After Colorado:182.60 (4th, 12th) After Stanford:185.84 (4th, 8th) After bye: 185.84 (3rd, 4th) After Washington:179.76 (3rd, 7th) After Washington State: 181.45 (1st, 4th) Why: Nix was 18 of 25 for 293 yards with 2 touchdowns PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE 2013: 105.75 (1st, 7th) 2014: 125.18 (3rd, 54th) 2015: 139.14 (8th, 95th) 2016: 143.16 (10th, 103rd) 2017: 122.85 (5th, 48th) 2018: 124.95 (4th, 49th) 2019: 113.69 (2nd, 14th) 2020: 124.02 (3rd, 30th) 2021: 127.01 (5th, 41st) 2022: 133.66 (3rd, 79th) After Portland State: 78.34 (1st, 13th) After Texas Tech: 112.09 (4th, 40th) After Hawaii: 104.31 (3rd, 20th) After Colorado: 108.13 (4th, 26th) After Stanford: 109.0 (2nd, 19th) After bye: 109.0 (2nd, 15th) After Washington: 118.81 (4th, 30th) After Washington State: 125.26 (5th, 45th) Why: Ward was 34 of 48 for 438 yards and 1 touchdown and Lincoln Victor threw an incomplete pass KICK RETURN DEFENSE 2013: 21.65 (9th, 70th) 2014: 21.39 (7th, 72nd) 2015: 22.42 (10th, 86th) 2016: 20.52 (8th, 63rd) 2017: 22.14 (6th, 86th) 2018: 22.68 (9th, 105th) 2019: 24.43 (10th, 118th) 2020: 21.33 (6th, 66th) 2021: 23.0 (8th, 102nd) 2022: 25.2 (11th, 125th) After Portland State: 14.67 (3rd, 38th) After Texas Tech: 18.75 (6th, 66th) After Hawaii: 17.6 (5th, 52nd) After Colorado: 17.6 (4th, 48th) After Stanford: 18.5 (6th, 55th) After bye: 18.5 (5th, 51st) After Washington: 20.0 (7th, 68th) After Washington State: 18.67 (7th, 55th) Why: Washington State had an 8-yard return TOTAL OFFENSE 2013: 565.0 (1st, 2nd) 2014: 547.0 (1st, 3rd) 2015: 538.2 (1st, 5th) 2016: 491.7 (2nd, 15th) 2017: 440.9 (4th, 30th) 2018: 427.2 (3rd, 41st) 2019: 433.1 (4th, 40th) 2020: 412.9 (6th, 49th) 2021: 423.6 (5th, 50th) 2022: 500.5 (4th, 6th) After Portland State: 729 (1st, 1st) After Texas Tech: 589.5 (1st, 2nd) After Hawaii: 587 (2nd, 3rd) After Colorado: 570.8 (2nd, 2nd) After Stanford: 557.8 (2nd, 2nd) After bye: 557.8 (2nd, 2nd) After Washington: 553.3 (1st, 1st) After Washington State: 551.6 (1st, 1st) Why: Oregon had 541 yards on 57 plays TOTAL DEFENSE 2013: 370.1 (3rd, 37th) 2014: 429.7 (8th, 87th) 2015: 485.3 (12th, 116th) 2016: 518.4 (11th, 126th) 2017: 369.2 (4th, 46th) 2018: 385.9 (6th, 55th) 2019: 329.1 (2nd, 22nd) 2020: 405.9 (5th, 62nd) 2021: 385.6 (8th, 72nd) 2022: 381.2 (4th, 71st) After Portland State: 200 (1st, 13th) After Texas Tech: 328 (6th, 61st) After Hawaii: 285.7 (5th, 30th) After Colorado: 264.0 (3rd, 11th) After Stanford: 255.6 (1st, 10th) After bye: 255.6 (2nd, 6th) After Washington: 282.2 (3rd, 13th) After Washington State: 312.6 (3rd, 20th) Why: Washington State had 495 yards on 71 plays PUNT RETURNS 2013: 12.39 (2nd, 19th) 2014: 12.48 (3rd, 12th) 2015: 12.58 (4th, 23rd) 2016: 7.55 (7th, 73rd) 2017: 6.44 (8th, 79th) 2018: 11.95 (1st, 29th) 2019: 14.33 (3rd, 9th) 2020: 7.0 (7th, 62nd) 2021: 10.0 (7th, 40th) 2022: 4.92 (10th, 107th) After Portland State: 6.8 (5th, 49th) After Texas Tech: 6.8 (5th, 67th) After Hawaii: 8.45 (4th, 54th) After Colorado: 8.31 (5th, 59th) After Stanford: 8.31 (5th, 64th) After bye: 8.31 (6th, 66th) After Washington: 7.71 (6th, 72nd) After Washington State: 7.93 (6th, 69th) Why: Tez Johnson had 1 return for 11 yards SCORING OFFENSE 2013: 45.5 (1st, 4th) 2014: 45.4 (1st, 4th) 2015: 43.0 (1st, 5th) 2016: 35.4 (4th, 27th) 2017: 36.0 (3rd, 18th) 2018: 34.8 (2nd, 25th) 2019: 35.4 (2nd, 16th) 2020: 31.3 (4th, 42nd) 2021: 31.4 (3rd, 42nd) 2022: 38.8 (4th, 10th) After Portland State:81 (1st, 1st) After Texas Tech:59.5 (1st, 1st) After Hawaii: 58.0 (2nd, 2nd) After Colorado: 54.0 (2nd, 2nd) After Stanford: 51.6 (2nd, 2nd) After bye: 51.6 (2nd, 2nd) After Washington:48.5 (1st, 1st) After Washington State: 47.0 (1st, 2nd) Why: Oregon scored 38 points SCORING DEFENSE 2013: 20.5 (2nd, 13th) 2014: 23.6 (2nd, 30th) 2015: 37.5 (12th, 115th) 2016: 41.4 (11th, 126th) 2017: 29.0 (8th, 81st) 2018: 25.4 (6th, 48th) 2019: 16.5 (2nd, 9th) 2020: 28.3 (6th, 59th) 2021: 27.0 (9th, 75th) 2022: 27.4 (5th, 75th) After Portland State: 7 (2nd, 15th) After Texas Tech: 18.5 (8th, 53rd) After Hawaii: 15.7 (6th, 31st) After Colorado: 13.2 (3rd, 16th) After Stanford: 11.8 (2nd, 8th) After bye: 11.8 (1st, 5th) After Washington: 15.8 (2nd, 11th) After Washington State: 17.0 (3rd, 16th) Why: Washington State scored 24 points PUNT RETURN DEFENSE 2013: 3.25 (1st, 9th) 2014: 5.75 (3rd, 36th) 2015: 15.28 (12th, 124th) 2016: 7.94 (6th, 68th) 2017: 6.55 (7th, 58th) 2018: 7.36 (5th, 51st) 2019: 7.42 (3rd, 64th) 2020: 7.44 (4th, 70th) 2021: 11.07 (10th, 113th) 2022: 13.6 (12th, 119th) After Portland State: 0.0 (4th, 9th) After Texas Tech: 33.0 (12th, 132nd) After Hawaii: 22.5 (11th, 126th) After Colorado: 15.67 (10th, 119th) After Stanford: 15.67 (11th, 123rd) After bye: 15.67 (12th, 122nd) After Washington: 15.67 (12th, 122nd) After Washington State: 15.67 (12th, 124th) Why: Washington State did not return a punt SACKS ALLOWED 2013: 18 sacks, 1.38 per game (3rd, 29th) 2014: 31 sacks, 2.07 per game (4th, 63rd) 2015: 39 sacks, 3.00 per game (9th, 111th) 2016: 29 sacks, 2.42 per game (10th, 91st) 2017: 25 sacks, 1.92 per game (5th, 54th) 2018: 22 sacks, 1.69 per game (4th, 35th) 2019: 25, 1.79 per game (4th, 49th) 2020: 11, 1.57 per game (5th, 29th) 2021: 24, 1.71 per game (4th, 36th) 2022: 5, 0.38 per game (1st, 1st) After Portland State:0, 0.0 per game (1st, 1st) After Texas Tech: 1, 0.5 per game (1st, 8th) After Hawaii: 1, 0.33 per game (1st, 2nd) After Colorado: 3, 0.75 per game (2nd, 8th) After Stanford: 3, 0.6 per game (1st, 5th) After bye: 3, 0.6 per game (1st, 6th) After Washington: 4, 0.67 per game (1st, 5th) After Washington State: 4, 0.57 per game (1st, 2nd) Why: Washington State did not have a sack SACKS 2013: 28 sacks, 2.15 per game (7th, 52nd) 2014: 37 sacks, 2.47 per game (7th, 38th) 2015: 38 sacks, 2.92 per game (2nd, 9th) 2016: 25 sacks, 2.08 per game (6th, 61st) 2017: 33 sacks, 2.54 per game (5th, 28th) 2018: 29 sacks, 2.23 per game (7th, 57th) 2019: 41, 2.93 per game (1st, 16th) 2020: 12, 1.71 per game (9th, 91st) 2021: 23, 1.64 per game (8th, 104th) 2022: 18, 1.38 per game (10th, 123rd) After Portland State: 0, 0.0 per game (n/a) After Texas Tech: 4, 2.0 per game (7th, 63rd) After Hawaii: 6, 2.0 per game (6th, 65th) After Colorado: 13, 3.25 per game (4th, 18th) After Stanford: 18, 3.6 per game (3rd, 9th) After bye: 18, 3.6 per game (2nd, 8th) After Washington: 19, 3.17 per game (3rd, 11th) After Washington State: 25, 3.57 per game (1st, 5th) Why: Oregon had 6 sacks PENALTIES AND TURNOVERS THIRD-DOWN CONVERSIONS 2013: 43.1 percent (5th, 45th) 2014: 49.5 percent (1st, 9th) 2015: 39.1 percent (9th, 69th) 2016: 39.1 percent (7th, 79th) 2017: 41.0 percent (9th, 56th) 2018: 42.9 percent (4th, 34th) 2019: 41.8 percent (7th, 44th) 2020: 43.2 percent (6th, 44th) 2021: 51.1 percent(1st, 4th) 2022: 46.3 percent (5th, 18th) After Portland State: 42.9 (8th, 57th) After Texas Tech: 52.0 (7th, 33rd) After Hawaii: 51.4(4th, 22nd) After Colorado: 47.8(2nd, 27th) After Stanford: 50.9(2nd, 12th) After bye: 50.9 (1st, 10th) After Washington: 53.5 (1st, 6th) After Washington State: 53.1 (1st, 5th) Why: Oregon was 5 of 19 on third down THIRD-DOWN DEFENSE 2013: 40.3 percent (10th, 71st) 2014: 42.3 percent (12th, 89th) 2015: 42.2 percent (7th, 93rd) 2016: 48.5 percent (11th, 122nd) 2017: 33.3 percent (2nd, 24th) 2018: 37.1 percent (5th, 45th) 2019: 33.2 percent (2nd, 22nd) 2020: 41.4 percent (5th, 75th) 2021: 46.0 percent (10th, 118th) 2022: 46.8 percent (9th, 123rd) After Portland State: 26.7 (3rd, 32nd) After Texas Tech: 42.9 (9th, 84th) After Hawaii: 33.3 (5th, 37th) After Colorado: 33.0 (3rd, 35th) After Stanford: 32.9 (4th, 28th) After bye: 32.9 (2nd, 25th) After Washington: 34.5 (3rd, 39th) After Washington State: 33.7 (3rd, 29th) Why: Washington State was 4 of 14 on third downs TURNOVER MARGIN 2013: +10, 0.77 per game (2nd, 17th) 2014: +23, 1.53 per game (1st, 1st) 2015: +5, 0.38 per game (3rd, 34th) 2016: -3, minus-0.25 per game (10th, 85th) 2017: even, 0.00 per game (7th, 64th) 2018: +5, 0.38 per game (3rd, 35th) 2019: +16, 1.14 per game (1st, 5th) 2020: -9, -1.29 per game (11th, 121st) 2021: +9, 0.64 per game (3rd, 18th) 2022: +9, 0.69 per game (2nd, 18th) After Portland State: +1, 1.0 per game (2nd, 23rd) After Texas Tech: +5, 2.5 per game (1st, 4th) After Hawaii: +6, 2.0 per game (1st, 4th) After Colorado: +5, 1.25 per game (2nd, 9th) After Stanford: +5, 1.0 per game (2nd, 12th) After bye: +5, 1.0 per game (2nd, 11th) After Washington: +6, 1.0 per game (2nd, 11th) After Washington State: +6, 0.86 per game (2nd, 15th) Why: There were no turnovers RED ZONE OFFENSE 2013: 78.4 percent (11th, 94th) 2014: 86.3 percent (7th, 43rd) 2015: 85.7 percent (8th, 52nd) 2016: 82.4 percent (9th, 79th) 2017: 89.3 percent (3rd, 27th) 2018: 84.3 percent (6th, 64th) 2019: 77.8 percent (11th, 96th) 2020: 86.7 percent (7th, 39th) 2021: 84.2 percent (6th, 63rd) 2022: 84.3 percent (6th, 64th) After Portland State:100 percent (1st, 1st) After Texas Tech:92.3 percent (6th, 35th) After Hawaii: 94.1 percent (4th, 21st) After Colorado: 91.3 percent (4th, 28th) After Stanford: 89.3 percent (7th, 43rd) After bye: 89.3 percent (7th, 37th) After Washington:84.8 percent (8th, 62nd) After Washington State: 86.5 percent (5th, 51st) Why: Oregon scored 3 touchdowns and a field goal on 4 red zone trips RED ZONE DEFENSE 2013: 80.4 percent (4th, 40th) 2014: 84.7 percent (8th, 82nd) 2015: 90.9 percent (10th, 116th) 2016: 89.2 percent (10th, 100th) 2017: 82.6 percent (5th, 60th) 2018: 83.7 percent (6th, 74th) 2019: 76.9 percent (2nd, 23rd) 2020: 83.9 percent (6th, 64th) 2021: 86.9 percent (10th, 95th) 2022: 76.9 percent (3rd, 22nd) After Portland State: 100 percent (7th, 73rd) After Texas Tech: 83.3 percent (6th, 60th) After Hawaii: 77.8 percent (6th, 50th) After Colorado: 80.0 percent (5th, 50th) After Stanford: 81.8 percent (6th, 57th) After bye: 81.8 percent (6th, 57th) After Washington: 80.0 percent (6th, 47th) After Washington State: 80.0 percent (6th, 50th) Why: Washington State had 2 touchdowns and 2 field goals on 5 red zone trips PENALTY YARDS PER GAME 2013: 70.15 (10th, 116th) 2014: 72.27 (8th, 115th) 2015: 61.00 (10th, 92nd) 2016: 75.83 (12th, 126th) 2017: 88.31 (12th, 129th) 2018: 47.92 (4th, 41st) 2019: 61.57 (9th, 103rd) 2020: 50.86 (6th, 60th) 2021: 64.57 (9th, 111th) 2022: 57.23 (9th, 84th) After Portland State: 20 (1st, 10th) After Texas Tech: 72 (8th, 112th) After Hawaii: 73.33 (10th, 109th) After Colorado: 75.0 (9th, 118th) After Stanford: 64.0 (9th, 105th) After bye: 64.0 (9th, 108th) After Washington: 62.5 (9th, 102nd) After Washington State: 60.0 (6th, 94th) Why: Oregon committed 7 penalties for 45 yards Statistically speaking: Oregon football’s offense leads Pac-12, except in red zone WWW.OREGONLIVE.COM The Ducks lead the country in total offense and are second in scoring, yet inside the 20-yard line they drop to 51st.

Quite amusing after Washington almost laid an egg in their game against a one win team this season. Washington fans should be praising the refs for their excellent shoddy play-calling in this game against ASU. They truly played the12th man out there for the Huskies.

Pac-12 Power Rankings: UW fumbles away No. 1 spot with embarrassing showing vs. ASU Pac-12 Power Rankings: UW fumbles away No. 1 spot with embarrassing showing vs. ASU | Ducks Wire DUCKSWIRE.USATODAY.COM Pac-12 Power Rankings: UW fumbles away No. 1 spot with embarrassing showing vs. ASU

Dan Lanning talks love for Bucky Irving, Jestin Jacobs, and need for improvement Oregon Football: Dan Lanning talks Ducks win and love for Bucky Irving DUCKSWIRE.USATODAY.COM Dan Lanning talks love for Bucky Irving, Jestin Jacobs, and need for improvement

Oregon Football Takes Care Of The Cougars, 38-24 WSU hurt by not being able to stop the Ducks from running Oregon Football Takes Care Of The Cougars, 38-24 WWW.ADDICTEDTOQUACK.COM WSU hurt by not being able to stop the Ducks from running

Bo Nix, Bucky Irving Impress Fans As Oregon Beats Washington State Bo Nix, Bucky Irving Impress Fans As Oregon Beats Washington State BLEACHERREPORT.COM Bo Nix and running back Bucky Irving shined during No. 9 Oregon's 38-24 win over Washington State on Saturday. Nix finished the afternoon with 293 yards and…

Social media reacts to Oregon Ducks dominant win over Washington State Social media reacts to Oregon Ducks dominant win over Washington State DUCKSWIRE.USATODAY.COM Social media reacts to Oregon Ducks dominant win over Washington State Oregon Football: Instant reactions to Oregon’s 38-24 win over WSU DUCKSWIRE.USATODAY.COM Instant Reactions: Oregon bounces back with 38-24 win over Washington State

Report: Big Ten coaches knew of sign-stealing scheme, Michigan assistant in focus While public scrutiny has only been on Michigan football for the better part of a day after news broke on Thursday that the Wolverines may have violated NCAA rules in efforts to learn opponents’ signals, opponents have known far longer. Report: Big Ten coaches knew of sign-stealing scheme, Michigan assistant in focus WWW.ON3.COM The Wolverines ability to know what the other team might be running has been a behind-the-scenes topic among league coaches for months.