GODUCKS15 No. 1 Share Posted November 14, 2021 According to Canzano ESPN used low quality signal transmission and only 6 cameras for the game. Is that why the AB TD/fumble was not viewed correctly? Not sure if this link will work as it's a subscriber link. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vandownbytheriverduck No. 2 Share Posted November 14, 2021 ESPN wants the Ducks and PAC12 out. They are in bed with the SEC. Win out and that will shut them all up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deschutesduck No. 3 Share Posted November 14, 2021 Your link worked. I couldn't believe how bad it was, at first i thought it was hulu so i switched to the espn app, then to my htpc but the quality was garbage on all of them. You could tell it was the compression rate they were using for the stream cause close ups were crystal clear but any more distant shots looked awful. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DurangoJim No. 4 Share Posted November 14, 2021 The whole broadcast was horrible. High school quality cameras, minimal replay views. (Well, maybe that was an improvement over last weeks too many?) Embarrassing! And yes, proper camera coverage might have helped overturn AB’ goal line “fumble”. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrw Moderator No. 5 Share Posted November 14, 2021 It was a low-energy amateur hour production all the way, from the video quality to the announcers. It was as if everyone involved was merely going through the motions. If there is a review of games at ESPN, this one should be given an "F". 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Washington Waddler Moderator No. 6 Share Posted November 14, 2021 Agreed. There needs to be instilled a pre-agreement review by the PAC 12 on coverage arrangements by any network that contracts them to specific viewing requirements. But then, what did we expect? It was ESPN. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
30Duck No. 7 Share Posted November 14, 2021 On 11/14/2021 at 10:53 AM, DurangoJim said: And yes, proper camera coverage might have helped overturn AB’ goal line “fumble”. From the coverage we did get, it sure looked like, "broke the plane" to me. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DurangoJim No. 8 Share Posted November 14, 2021 On 11/14/2021 at 12:04 PM, 30Duck said: From the coverage we did get, it sure looked like, "broke the plane" to me. Looked like it to me too, but alas they didn’t hear my screams either. Should have been called a TD on the field, then reviewed it to confirm. It then couldn’t have been overturned due to no better view angles. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa Rosa Duck No. 9 Share Posted November 14, 2021 This is not the first game this year with poor quality definition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
