Washington Waddler

Interesting comparison to Marcus, but more information on Moga needed. What made MM so lethal wasn’t just his speed and accuracy, but the instinctive timing and presence he brought to his pocket choices. Eyes in the back of your head are a gift.

Hey, at least it’s not ‘bow down to Bowdoin’. Count your blessings.

Because the teams split the talent evenly, it just has me chomping at the bit to see what we can unleash on both sides of the ball come fall.

You may be right. But, I believe the jury is still out concerning the eventual effect on programs of treating and trading college level players like commodity market acquisitions. There may be a reaction to this as yet somewhere down the road. Is it wise to put all your eggs into the basket that says you can simply buy success? Not sure.

The greatest carnage created by the transfer portal appears to be in transitional NIL-focused programs with head coaches in their 1st and 2nd years. Both Lanning and Sanders have the mandate, means and the vision-driven will to recreate their programs in their own image. I don’t think you see this same level of student wreckage in other high-powered programs with more settled coaching situations. Transfers occur both in and out, but they are not trying to rebuild an image of themselves which hopefully allows college ‘coaching’ to still happen in the development of potential. Because the transfer portal has such a dramatic effect on program situations like those currently at Oregon and Colorado, perhaps the rules committee might want to revisit how the student part of the equation can be dealt with more fairly. For me, the primary purpose of a university is still to help develop young adult, whether athlete or not. The mad rush to leave behind the concept of player development in order to just win is contrary to that promise. If you’re that afraid of being left behind, perhaps the NFL is a better fit for your longings?

Always sound advice not to shoot the messenger. Especially when his is bigger than yours is!

This whole process is like watching jockeys ‘jockeying’ for position through the turns before they have to commit down the home stretch. You can’t blame every conference for wanting what’s best for themselves. Reality has yet settle the matter.

Ty is a real head-scratcher. Not because lots of players don’t need time to gain confidence, but because it is so rare to see at his position. As a group, QBs are the alphas - the leaders - on any team. Talent aside, they are drawn to the position because of that inherent characteristic. That’s what makes him so hard to understand. He’s probably as puzzled by this lack as the rest of us. But, I have to admire his determination to solve this issue. Like his cheering section, he knows he needs to start saying I can, and stop saying I can’t.

Smith is proving to me that he can transition from being an edge reliant, underdog mentality type coach into being a targeted program that continues to be successful. Deboer hasn’t gotten there yet.

Thought and action; cause and effect, are like the two sides of a coin: something like a marriage of opposites. You can’t allow one to get the upper hand on the other, or nothing seems to work right. Balancing scheme and execution is probably the most significant (and hidden) challenge facing any coach. Do that right, and everything seems to run smoothly. Let one get more important than the other, and you’re always scratching your head trying to figure what’s gone wrong. That’s why I think it’s important to understand who Stein’s comments were really directed at: his players. That’s his audience; not us. Oregon is undergoing a culture change based upon Lanning’s introduction of the Georgia ‘de-recruitment’ process. That’s a big installment requiring a tad more emphasis on the players’ responsibilities right now. It will eventually even out with scheme, but right now it’s all about getting in people’s’ faces.

Not sure why it’s so acceptable these days for some to cross the line between woofing at a rival school and taunting a fellow competitor by either demeaning them or exulting in their defeat. I can enjoy the student section chant of, “start your tractors” at the end of a C***l War game victory over the Beavers because I know the same fate of being made fun of is awaiting us somewhere down the line. I may be weary of hearing it’s open season on ducks, but I get it. I accept it. That’s Tradition. What I don’t get and will never accept is the infantile, insulting behavior of both Clark and Reese and any other present day athletes who’ve forgotten how to just play the game and leave the woofing to the fans.

‘Absence’ for the media always represents a time for panic. Since they can only deal in differing levels of hearsay, the image of reality remains inconclusive, and therefore exceedingly frustrating because what they desire is a definitive answer. That’s always the reality for those on the outside looking in. On the other hand, ‘absence’ for those responsible for creating that answer simply means accepting the time element required in order to arrive at an answer. So long as the PAC?? remains a work in progress, with the universities pondering potential dance partners, the potential media partners must suspend judgement awaiting that answer. How else can it be? No body likes it, but you can’t count your chickens until the hen has laid the eggs.

Like players, fans can be guilty of this as well. I’ve never understood the chant, “over rated!” when the home team is in position to defeat a higher ranked opponent.

As an Oregon fan, I feel an inherent responsibility to try and understand the double-edged sword that Nike investments in the athletic department have become. The good news it’s a phenomenal sales tool for coaches in the recruiting process. The bad news is it’s a phenomenal sales tool for coaches who may end up not knowing what to do with all these newly acquired riches.

Well said. At one time, the child’s world of self-directed desire on the playground (or the street corner) would meet young adulthood’s expectations in the world of organized sport’s obligation to treat your opponent with the same respect as you would yourself. Now it seems the inmates are running the asylum.

His attention to route sequence and end-of-play details (head/shoulder position, ball security and getting yards after catch) say a lot about what he is focused on: winning.

Understood. My view point is from that of being a disenfranchised purist; something akin to expatriates who can never stop dreaming of the old country? Like many old Nebraska, Colorado, and Missouri fans, my guess is Dodd harbors a hidden nostalgia for his origins.

For what it’s worth, Dodd appears to be firmly entrenched in B12 country. A graduate of Missouri as is his daughter, and his son attends Kansas. He currently lives in Kansas, has worked for the Kansas City Star and written two books; one on Missouri basketball, and the other on the formation of the B12. Draw your own conclusions.

It’s quite possible that college football’s sense of community, tradition and sense of territorial integrity are now beyond the point of being at risk in this Chicken Little climate of panic-stricken lunging for a spot at the table of $$. What is potentially gained or lost goes well beyond the survival desire of Beavers or Cougars. It has more to do with accepting the notion that college football as we have known it is dead. That may be the case. I’m just not convinced the answer is a mad scramble to shove yourself and all your toys onto an escape pod and jettison yourself towards . . . ? Fear (of being left out) is rarely the wisest foundation upon which to base decision making.

Don’t forget Corn Hole as the only game day party option

Agree, but the conundrum is he still need top players. Reaching for the stars (literally) is what any good coach should do; hence, Dana’s move to Oregon. But, the learning curve on who to select and how to coach-up these star piles that moving here has given him access to has been a real challenge. Before Oregon, you could say his recruits were like him: blue collar, motivated coachable kids who wanted both individual and team success. Now, he has to deal with talent that is often motivated by something other than love of the game. There are times I’m not sure that registers with him. Perhaps Dana needs to take a piece out of the Dan Lanning recruiting book and apply the de-recruitment theory to his new charges. Not sure that would translate well from the field to the court, but he does need to try something new.

It’s always been astounding to me how a team’s down year that equates into a dead-end recruiting-wise for us fans is so often viewed by recruits as the opening they’ve been looking for.

Welcome to ‘Selfie World’ where you celebrate yourself just because it’s you!

Listening to people wax nostalgic about Mac Court is like listening to people who want to clone their beloved dog with the expectation that they’ll get the same results. Life doesn’t work that way. It moves on and changes. No, Matt will never be Mac, but that doesn’t mean it can’t intimidate opposing teams. It can. We’ve seen it happen. It just takes more of us — and more effort. In other words, exactly what Dana was saying. Sometimes you just go because you’re a Duck and you support the team irregardless of how you feel about the current edition.

Dana did appear to try that at the end on defense, only to have his strategy to guard Chuck Hepburn ignored. Disciplined thinking has been a problem with this team all year. Teams that are on for one game, and then off the next as this team has so often been is just a sign of mental laziness.