Nevada Dawg

didn't know Hocker was an ex-Duck until after the race, but that makes his thrilling upset all the sweeter. Congrats Cole on a truly thrilling performance. Races like this is why I love the Olympics!

Yeah, but I want the recruit for whom the "other boxes" are the main thing, and if it is perceived that they are not, particularly by one's prospective teammates, culture problems could clearly surface. Some who know have said that this was a problem a couple of years ago when T$M clearly bought the top rated class. Now several of those "bought" players are gone, as is the head coach.

Lol, thanks Jon

And SC follows suit by flipping a Georgia commit the very next day (or two) later. The Georgia player flipping saw the stacked DB room at Georgia and had been seeking other pastures since late Spring. As the SC flip was also a DB, this comes across pretty much as a trade with Georgia getting the player more willing to come in and compete for a job--Kirby's kind of guy. As for the theme of this post, I would take a move by SC to hand the reins over to Prime as an indication that the Trojans were in the early phases of de-emphasizing football. How could a once proud program be so cavalier?

I care about his opinion. He is a first-rate college analyst. Of course, analysts who make so many calls get a number wrong. I believe Michigan has a good shot .very good, at reaching the playoffs but have lost too much to be considereed prime candidates to hoist the trophy when all the playoff smoke as cleared. In this sense I agree with McElroy. Of course, I also know that many of you may not give a flip about what I think

Yes Charles, you do. And those who do often end up living their dreams, at least some of the time. A couple of sources who know Kirby Smart well say that he always dreamed of their being a day when he was mentioned as belonging in the circle of Nick Saban and the other coaching luminaries of that era. He lost out in the head-to-head competition while Nick was still around, and two of those games, the 2017 natty and 2018 SEC championship, are games that many think UGA should have won. But after two Nattys and a near miss on the playoffs last year, Kirby has earned his spot at the table. I'll be watching with great interest to see if young coach Lanning can manage to pull up a chair at that prestigious coaches table over the next few years. Go Ducks!

I saw the Lanning interview with McAfee today in which Dan Lanning jabbed back playfully at Kirby Smart's nice comments about meeting Phil Knight and wishing he had some of the NIL war chest available to Lanning. It is abundantly clear that Smart and Lanning really like each other. In fact Lanning said Kirby was an awesome mentor from whom he learned more than he had from any other football coach. Had Smart been there he might have quipped back with something like "Yeah, I might have taught him enough that it will probably come back to bite me in the butt some day." They are both great guys IMHO, awesome football coaches, and excellent guides for serious minded young men. The profession is lucky to have them.

I know Mullins is paid to worry and who could blame him after Taggert and Cristobal (neither of whom ever impressed me). Of course, I couldn't say for sure that Lanning would stay, but having heard his positive comments about Eugene, the university, and the affection his family felt for the area, I would have been shocked by a move to Tuscaloosa. For one thing it was too early. And I think Dan felt he had serious unfinished business in the valley. I also think that Dan knew the risks of following Saban at Alabama. If you are going there you want to become the guy who follows Saban's successor. DeBoer may do quite well there' but it is really an almost impossible comparison over the long run..

The Ducks-Dawgs matchup could easily happen this year though we'd be projecting pretty far into the future for both teams. But it would be fin to watch, wouldn't it? And I'd feel good about the outcome no matter which team prevailed.

I agree that there is no way that a football tourney can be inclusive as basketball. I also think that 17 games should be about the absolute max. Yet, in the interest of inclusivity. it is OK for a very deserving team to be excluded occasionally. It has happened to my Dawgs twice in the past five years (2018, 2023) when virtually all the heavyweights considered Georgia to be one of the best four teams, but other considerations put them at #5. I didn't like it but knew the rules for inclusion and was OK both years (though not happy). Again I will say that no team should gripe too much if omitted when they can't finish at least third in their conference. Give the Libertys or App States or Boise States shot if warranted. Funny things can happen (e.g., Tulane over the condoms two years ago). Now wasn't that worth it?

Want to kill college football for the larger public? Keep finding ways to chastise some power 4 champs as less worthy, exclude G5 teams, and give the majority of the slots to the BIG and SEC. I personally want playoffs that are broadly inclusive and have no sympathy for excluded SEC or B1G teams that can't manage to finish at least third in their conference. There may be some good ones occasionally that are excluded, so let them play in a better bowl game. Sorry if that offends anyone, but that's my view and I'm sticking with it.

I get a kick out of these "projecton" exercises which, if nothing else, aptly illustrate that the offseason is too damn long. How these things come out depend heavily on assumptions made and on little that is objectively verifiable. This little exercise is gratifying for those of us who follow the Ducks and are fun to read. But...remember that it is another in a long line of mental masturbations that make their appearance every off season. I know, I'm no fun. But THANKFULLY, Fall camp is about ready to start and we will soon be into the data that really matter--what actually happens between the lines.

My cable provider still does not "provide" the BTN Network and it is one of the majors (Spectrum). It does provide the ACC network however, not that there are oodles of ACC fans in my neck of the woods. Hopefully, Oregon will be enough of a draw to keep most their games on Fox or CBS. If there is Duck game on BTN that I can't miss, there is a casino sports book 8 miles away so I guess I'll be good.

I can guarantee that Kirby respects Lanning and the Ducks program. And if anyone still had any doubts, the good natured jabbing between Saban and Smart at SEC media days should put to rest forever the ridiculous assertion of many Dawg and Bama fans that the two men don't like each other. I am fortunate to get to know each of these men at different points in my academic career. They are both decent honorable men who truly respect each other. Kirby was still calling Saban coach during the interview, and Saban called Kirby the best assistant coach he ever had. They wanted to beat each other's brains out between the lines. but only within the context of a sporting event. I suspect that someday Kirby and DL will talk about each other in the same way.

To me, bringing the SEC out west would imply having a big, fast, physical team with a power defense. I haven't seen it yet, but Lanning is trying and we have to remember that he is only entering his third year as a head man. I expect to see real strides in that direction this year, although I still think there may be bumps in the road that several of us cannot foresee in the overexuberance of Talkin Season". I'm getting really tired of talking. Can't wait for Fall camp to start and getting ready to back the talk (or not) between the darn lines!

I've told my fellow posters that on the Talk'n Dawgs site that DL is building an SEC caliber team in Eugene, and several pitched in to say that they like the Ducks' physicality. My .02 worth: The rank and file of the PAC-12 in its final year was superior to last year's B1G rank and file IMHO. Michigan was a worthy champ, but top to bottom, the PAC may well have been the better overall aggregation.

Newton had one of the EPIC final seasons in college football history, literally carrying Auburn to a title on his shoulders. That was his high water mark however, although I think I remember him getting to a Super Bowl. His statement, however, about Prescott vs. Herbert is pure fantasy IMHO. Herbert's best years are in front of him and I'm anxious to watch them.

Dawgs will manage their schedule no matter what. And by the way 20th is by far the lowest I've seen Georgia's schedule rated anywhere--and Sports Illustrated has become somewhat of a joke in the college football credibility world I'm told. I notice that no mention was made on the board of the SEC's ratings of strength of schedules when the list came out. Not surprisingly given the source, the biggest number of tough schedules were in the SEC. These off-season lists are clown shows in my opinion. For example the BIG fared very poorly on this strength of schedule--only one or none as I recall in the top 10. That's obviously as bogus as Sports Illustrated. Except for Oregon, I hate the B1G, but partisan as I may be, I know there are B1G schedules out there that are very tough.

Goodbye and RIP Khyree. We hardly got to know you.

Well the University of Texas is actually equally arrogant. You can find bumper stickers and back window decals all over the state with burnt orange lettering that proclaim the place as The University (as if no other center of higher learning in the state really matters). That always irked me as much as THE Ohio State University (maybe more).

This is a great pickup if the Ducks can hold him. I will caution however that "the wire" in recruiting is not in July and sources I've seen think that this one is far from over. Having said that, I am much having him in the Duck camp and having to protect this asset than be on the outside looking in hoping for a later flip.

I do think that the B1G pundits do underestimate the Ducks somewhat. Lanning has done a remarkable job of putting a championship caliber roster together in a remarkably short time. But I also worry that our posters sometimes underestimate the difficulty of navigating a new league, particularly for road games in B1G stadiums. I don't have the Ducks schedule in front of me at the moment, but as a for instance, the first time we trip to Camp Randall in Madison Wisconsin could present some surprises. This is an example of a tough road venue, especially for a team that may never have been there before. As good as the Oregon team has the potential to be, I would not be shocked if we drop a B1G road game that nobody sees coming. I am not predicting such a loss, but only saying it wont shock me if such a thing occurs. Assuming the OSU game in Autzen can be considered a toss-up at this point, Oregon could drop a game on the road and the OSU game and still make the playoffs. The thing to be happiest about under this scenario, is that the season will be much longer in the 12- team playoff format, and the Ducks would now have a roster that stands a much better chance to navigating a long season successfully.

A couple $.02 worth comments. Yes, the T & F facilities in Eugene are as fine as I have seen anywhere at the University level in the U.S. I do not follow T & F closely except for Olympic years. But if memory serves me, The Ducks very often had top T & F teams. So is there anyone out there who can give m a quick synopsis on why things have fallen off? Or is my impression (and memory) totally off base?

Counterpoint (and I am not advocating here). The B1G powers that be may not be so asleep at the wheel regarding playoff locations as some of us Duck partisans might think. Sure there are domes in the East that could host games. But there are many forces in play here. The playoffs are played in December and January and fans of bowl teams have historically wanted to combine their game trips with warmer weather activities. If you are say a Michigan Wolverine or a Wisconsin Badger for example, would you rather have a mini-vacation to Miami or New Orleans or, alternatively, to Detroit or Indianapolis? My experience living in B1G country for Grad School was that the Midwesterners couldn't wait to get to warm weather sites for their games, and I suspect B1G officials know this. The travel bugaboo is obviously worse for the West Coast playoff participants. Domes for hosting games are fewer in the West, and few outdoor locations other than Southern California or Arizona are very desirable as host cities for such games. Of course on -campus games will sometimes present a challenge. I think we'll see it relatively soon but a home game in Autzen in December could present some interesting weather challenges (that most of us Duck fans would gladly "weather" if we could get in to see the contest). But I am hardly shocked that the playoffs will be a largely Southern phenomenon for the foreseeable future. Not advocating ; just sayin'. .

As a 12-year old, I saw the Giants third game at Seals Stadium in 1958. If I remember correctly, the Giants lost that one. Had the man who would have tied it on 2nd but the Giants catcher took a called strike three to end the game. Interestingly, Willie really didn't become the clear crowd favorite in 1958. I was like many fans, most of whom were old enough to know better, who expected heroics of Willie every time he strode to the plate. 12-year old me was sorely disappointed that Willie didn't homer at least once in that early game I saw. The big favorite that year was rookie Orlando Cepeda. The next year Felipe Alou and Willy McCovey became fan darlings. Because expectations for Willie Mays were unrealistically high, it took some time for him to earn his chops as the greatest Giant.