I am cautiously optimistic. These players have been developing in the system, so there should be more of a known factor than bringing a guy from the portal.

I think the biggest 'win' was not seeing so many of leave like the D line just did.

On the upside, we should see them play well as a unit because they have been practicing together for so long in the same system.

Last point: Seaton was great in the Big 12, but they don't have same kind of defensive players as the Big 10, except for Texas Tech. It will be interesting to see how he does vs SEC rushers.

There will be one addition. Transfer from Yale.

But I think development in the OL takes time and sometimes those timelines don't match up with need. However, keep in mind that Oregon have been finalists for the Joe Moore best O line award for the past three years. So they're still doing something right.

However I'd say this seasons line was a step down from the previous two. Harkey and World just weren't as refined at tackle.

As Urban Meyer and many others have noted, in today's CFB, the O-line is the most difficult position to recruit and portal pick.

In recognition of Yale's Michael Bennett committing to OBD -

"Eli, Eli, Bulldog, Bulldog, Bulldog, Bow, wow, wow!"

From one of Yale's fight songs, written by Cole Porter, Yale Class of 1913, in honor of Yale's mascot, bulldog Handsome Dan.

Here's hoping Mike brings some of that Bulldog with him. WOOF!

Extra credit for the Cole Porter reference.

Looking at the roster for returning o line guys I see:

1 five star

7 four stars

6 three stars

That doesn't include in coming freshman. I'd rather let these guys play than bring in portal guys and watch them all leave.