Solar

The only way to get rid of the anxiety is to be grateful for the season we've had, even if we lose. 13 and 1, B1G champs is a great year! My definition of gratefulness is "the art of lowering your standards and expectations."

I'm more impressed with the OL creating good creases for most of those runs. I don't think his ceiling is higher than any other backs on our roster other than Limar.

If it's doing the most with the least, Dillingham is the best. His resources are so bad it's epic, the conference picked his team to finish last, yet by the end of the year he blew out the competition in the CCG.

It could be worse, this could be soccer, full of hundred year old rules that conspire to keep the score as close to 0-0 as possible.

Why did it take so long for this to be announced. He clearly was unable to use his elbow to even jog on the field for the last play of the game. It was obviously a major injury. Georgia's biggest weakness besides their inconsistency, is their receivers are bad. They can't catch for starters, they can't get very open and they can't do anything special if they actually do end up with the ball in their hands. The difference from Bowers and McConkey last year is huge. They aren't elite like last year for that reason alone. That being said, as Josh Pate often mentions, the "QB down" effect is a real, that the rest of the team feels they need to pick up the slack for the backup QB and often play better than with their starter as long as the QB drop off isn't too big.

Another good you tube analyst looking at the matchups for the Rose Bowl:

Charles, he said "ranking" not seeding, and for that I do agree with him. The seeding format sucks, which we all agree with.

These dudes, all year, have given the best matchup analysis for Oregon Ducks football games. Always worth a listen:

We showed against Penn State that we can scheme our offense against DL pressure although Penn State's secondary isn't as good as OSU's. And it was good to see the new look of OSU defense to be better prepared for it. My biggest concern is OSU's offense scheming like they did against Tennessee. Attacking the edges of the defense and really taking advantage of their passing talent.

MGM Odds of the national champion for the top 6 is +300 both the best and +500 for the worst. I will say the most enjoyable games I watched yesterday were the FCS semi finals. Teams full of ballers with little talent disparity, save the Montana State QB.

Certainly in hindsight 8 was the right number this year, then again we still have BSU and ASU to prove they belong. Last year 4 was definitely not enough. The other thing we saw is just how big of a deal home field advantage is in the playoffs of a college football game.

I think the spread will widen as this OSU performance marinates over the next week and people forget how good Oregon can play too. The O/U is 52 which is stupid low to me. I think it's going to be first team to 35 wins.

How's everyone liking those B1G apples today? If only Oregon could play Texas next week so it could be 3 out of 4 in the Semis from the B1G

We beat them with a lot people playing sick too supposedly. I do think home field advantage is worth a ton for both Penn State and Notre Dame and Texas in a playoff game. I wish we played SMU at home today instead. Would have been a party. We'll see how Ohio State does in the shoe with half the fans from Tennessee.

Man nearly all of those guys are swing for the fence picks except Allar. USC will be a dumpster fire. We don't know if Moore will start next year. Jeremiah Johnson will need a QB that can throw and an OC that will let him. Dillon Crayola isn't him, at least not in that offense.

IU 31-13 Indiana is a team full of experienced ballers, so I think they will execute better in adverse conditions.

OSU 14, UT 13

With the exception of SMU I think there is little separation between these teams. Bring the popcorn!

Yeah, casually one could think he is a drop in replacement for Tez, but that's not close to reality. He has the natural feel for running with the ball, but not necessarily running routes and catching balls.

Any good coach is too good for that program unfortunately. I don't blame Dickert

Yeah, the article is a puff piece for CU homers. Sanders snagged a 5 star that idolized him and won an awards that is a popularity contest award, and somehow this changes anything at a team or coaching level. Oh and Dan has 5 five stars joining in the spring...

Let's not forget the Vernon Adams, and Cam Wards of the world that nobody knows about at a bottom dweller G4 or FCS school that can light it up. While high school to college seems to be crapshoot, low level college giant slayers translate very well to high level programs. And Bo wasn't exactly the hottest transfer QB when we picked him up. There are some excellent non high profile options every year. I'm pretty sure Dan is looking. Whether he actually ends up getting an experienced difference maker is TBD.

Even moreso it's their consistency that has separated them from the field, which bodes well for having to win multiple tough games.

That's what article based on SP+ shows. 20% chance still sucks. I'd put our odds closer to a 35-40% chance, which is still in the more likely to lose than win the Natty range. That's my head talking. My heart feels like we have about a 70% chance.

With Dowdell from Nebraska on deck...