Solar

Yeah. It's not exactly the most probable outcome, but there is definitely a world where Dan and Will discuss this contingency during game prep. I'm shocked that people here still think Brock is some kind of charity case and not our actual #2 QB, at least in bad weather. Does anyone actually think Moore played better than Brock against Wisconsin? I think it was close. We scored twice as many points with Brock in the same amount of game time. Does Dante handle those bad snaps that Brock handled? Dante's advantage over Brock is only the arm talent. But if it's pouring buckets and windy and the arm talent is neutralized, and if Dante is rattled, then he isn't making efficient split second decisions.

Scenario this Saturday: Cold and rainy again. Dante Moore has been Mr Happy Feet unable to see open receivers, and has taken 4 sacks on the first 4 possessions. Does Brock come in?

That's alright. Will is really good, but there will always be others.

Our OLine has to come out road grading. I think they are the biggest offender of slow starts on the entire team and it hurts when we can't run the ball early. At the same time Will can't wait until almost halftime to figure out Iowa is loading the box. That's why you run scripted plays for the first 2 series to see their game plan for a variety of our looks. First team to 27 wins.

Maybe Miami has a real epiphany that it is an improvement to go from "I lose games I shouldn't" Mario to "I lose the games I should" Franklin. Nah, they think they should be winning Natty's.

Yeah the odds of getting shut down 3 or 4 plays in a row is really high against great defenses, and Moore can't be expected to be as efficient as Nix and Gabriel were. The only alternative is to air it out more. I get it he hasn't had time at times, but a lot of times he has time, he just doesn't like what he sees and gets happy feet into scramble mode and goes down. If you get a one on one, don't stare them down, but do look off the safety, then huck the ball with some air under it and have our WRs go get it.

It wasn't being classy, it was the risk free move to make: two kneel downs to win vs giving the ball back to Florida to let stupid things happen to you with a minute 30 left to play, something Mario would love.

Mario isn't going anywhere for a few more seasons. He'll continue to tease them with greatness just enough to stick around.

I'm always surprised and the jubilation and consternation when a 40-50 yard bomb is picked off on 2nd or 3rd down. I mean, it's effectively just a high quality punt you made a down or two early assuming your WR is able to tackle the intercepting DB. What's the big deal? So, the downside is minimal if you're launching bombs from near midfield. And with our defense that has allowed the fewest trips in the red zone in the country, we can usually survive giving teams a long field, who cares if it harms time of possession. And the upside is anywhere from automatic field goal range to a touchdown. If you can get a 50/50 opportunity (i.e. 1 on 1, no safety) and you have a player like Dakorien Moore where it's more like 75/25 I think you should be taking that shot basically every time that opportunity presents itself. 3rd and short is when the opportunity would most likely present itself with single high safety. And if the defenses start to pick up on it as a tendency, and adapt to it, it would only make getting a more modest conversion that much easier pulling a defender out of the box. And last but not least, the most frequent outcome of an under thrown lofted bomb to a covered WR is pass interference. I think Moore has this option available, but he doesn't want to thrown a 50/50 ball, he wants the receiver to have an advantage and throw a pinpoint pass rather than putting some extra air under it if the receiver isn't open. He doesn't have it in him to throw to a covered receiver, he'd rather take an 80% chance of getting sacked vs. a 20% chance of getting intercepted every time. He's got too much Shadeur Sanders in him since Will Stein got ahold of him. I said before the season we simply wouldn't be as efficient on a per down basis with Moore vs. Nix, or Gabriel, the only way Moore would be able to replicate their success is if he threw an extra explosive play for every pass play he wastes or takes a sack. I wonder if it's been the wrong approach to try to turn Moore into Gabriel. Maybe it's the right approach if you're playing the long game, and I'm thinking it's about a 99% chance Moore is back next year.

There is a fair chance our lackluster performance vs Indiana was partially due to two weeks of the young team absorbing the hype we got after beating Penn State. So, yeah definitely less risk with us being undervalued vs.the alternative glowing adulation.

Dunning Kruger effect.. it's a measure of wisdom in it's own way. It's idiotic how the media keeps thinking Lanning is this coaching option for other teams. I mean DeBoer is more likely to leave Bama for something better than Lanning, why don't they throw his name out there instead. On a more realistic note, any Jedd Fisch rumors? That guy has always sounded like a short termer, so maybe this will be the test.if he's interested in a better college HC gig or if he's only really interested in moving on to the NFL. The irony for UW is any strong success whether this season or next, probably means Jedd gets an offer he can't refuse and they start over again with a new coach.

I agree. It isn't enough to have a complete roster, you have to use it. For every counter by the opposing defense you have to be able to recognize it and have a counter of your own. I'll go back to my prior pondering, is why is Stein not up in the box? Has he been under undervaluing the importance of seeing how the defense is attacking his play calling in real time. It's great we adjusted just before halftime, but we'd already thrown away 5 possessions at that point. Someone else mentioned more play-action pass which adds the RB as another blocker up front and creates more space across the middle behind the linebackers. I agree we should do more of that too.

It's a thing in the NFL that you are only as good as your biggest weakness. That applies to players (especially QB's) and schemes. The reason being that opposing coaches are good enough to scout your strengths and take those options away, forcing you to play to your weaknesses. I think this has happened to Stein and Moore this year. Penn State, Indiana, and Wisconsin all doing similar things defensively to take away our strengths. Dante Moore does great with a clean pocket and man coverage? Then bring pressure and play complex zone coverages. Stein likes to use up every blade of grass within 10 yards of the LOS? Run a 4-3 multiple defense that crowds the LOS across the width of the field. The next evolution of our offense is for Stein and Moore to get better at executing to their weaknesses. Moore needs to learn how to deal with real time zone schemes with simulated pressure options and learn how to move in the pocket to buy every last millisecond of time. Stein needs to learn how to create openings up the middle of the field and revise the route trees to create opportunities that materialize quicker for Moore. We've had the luxury of being tested to our weaknesses early in the season. I really hope theses 2 weeks are used to strengthen our weaknesses. If we can have just enough success with our weaknesses (which I believe we have enough talent potential to do) that opponents have start defending them, then that will reopen our strengths.

I'm not panicking, but I'm still worried. A loss to any of the teams left could leave us out of the playoffs. This young team's ability to disappear, primarily the offense, says we could absolutely lose another game. I'm really worried about Iowa. From the announcers for their last game it sounded like their offense is finally figuring some things out. Iowa with a really good offense is immediately a national title contender. Lastly I'm really surprised at all the love for this bye week. They feel more like kryptonite than a blessing lately. Maybe the analysts we have aren't a good fit for Lanning and the coordinators. And if we have to play early that is a recipe for losing a quarter or two before waking up. Minnesota did that and found themselves down 30 points in the first 20 minutes last week against Iowa.

It's Dante that can't beat a zone team, not Will. I do think Stein should be leaning hard into our WR Coach for improvements to make to route trees though.

Couldn't agree more with the article. The idea of Whittington being an every down RB never felt right. He's always been the change of pace back for a reason. Sone compare him to CJ Verdell, but Verdell had more power to drag people and more determination to get North to a fault. Davidson is magic to watch. He's a 230 lb guy with happy feet, the quickest choppiest feet I've ever seen, that allows him to constantly rebalance himself and adjust his lower body's leverage as the play develops, so he is always in a position to burst which ever way opens the most as, well as skinny up his feet to slide through the smallest gaps without getting tripped up. And he does this while staying behind his pads making forward progress though contact. That's what makes him special and the most efficient RB we have.

The difference between play action and rpo is for play action linemen only pass block and the QB has zero intention of handing the ball off.

Thanks. I'm happy to see the adds for once or else the top of my screen would just be a big red Wisconsin behind. Going forward it would be better if the duck player was on the left side of the photo. You could always mirror images to make that happen as well.

Ah yes, the all time leader in interceptions in the state of Alabama that never did much for us. Glad to see he is reaching a higher level on 53 man roster in the NFL.

This. I recall mentioning on this forum that Brock Thomas probably had the best spring game performance. Perhaps he is actually better than everyone other than Moore. It was odd to see Novosad warming up. Maybe he was trying to show the coaches he was ready to go too.

I'm still struggling to figure out if we are really good or really bad on offense. We've been both, especially early in games. We aren't matching the intensity of our opponents early on. Also, i wonder if we have so much variation in the plays we run that the offensive blocking doesn't have the precision to properly block a variety of different looks from defenses. So many of our "custom" play call are getting trashed by missed blocks. Not blocks they lost, I'm talking blocks they could have made, but a defender beat them to he point of attack or ducked in behind them because the blocker thought they didn't need to block them. I think defense is as good as we've had in the Lanning era. Maybe not quite 2019 good, but close.

Iowa up 30 on Minnesota with 11 minutes LEFT in the 2nd QUARTER. Iowa at home and it certainly looks like Minnesota forgot to show up, but we said the same when Indiana destroyed Illinois. Iowa looking like it is the most dangerous game left for us, and oh yeah, it's after our biggest nemesis: a bye week.

I think the larger college playoff field is also levelling the field at the top too. Even with NIL options, the risk vs reward for an also ran school to make a 4 team playoff was poor. With 12 teams the numbers start pencilling out for the Texas Tech, Vandy and Indiana of the world to make the investment.

If you have a time machine you go further back in time and don't hire Scott. We still wouldn't end up in as good of a spot as we are for football, but it would be way better for college sports on the whole.

Are we sure he will end up a QB? Maybe a different position would be a better fit. I would hope there is serious evaluation going on for his best potential to contribute.