David Marsh

Couple notes... I think the total rushing yards was bu design going to be a bit low for a couple reasons. 1) no need to beat up the runningbacks too badly by having them get tackled too much. Cardwell was apparently out due to some precautions. They probably could have run some walk ons more but that didn't seem like a priority. 2) the quarterbacks needed reps in front of a crowd and they threw a lot of passes. Some good and some bad ... But they threw a lot. 3) the offensive lines in play weren't full units whether they are first, second, or third string. By the sound of all the practice information, there isn't really a depth chart anywhere but perhaps the offensive line as that is really the only grouping (I suppose besides the entire defensive unit) that needs to play as one. So not too surprising that when mixed together they didn't perform too great. 4) On the flip side the defensive line just played aggressive and got behind that lose conglomeratation of an o-line and recorded a ton of "sacks". In an actual tackling situation how many of those would have been real sacks, probably less than what was called but not all of them certainly. With that in mind being as quarterbacks are considered down by touch and not by being tackled they really didn't make many rushing attempts themselves. In short... I'm not really worried about the rushing attack or lack there of at this time. What I was THRILLED to see though is a rushing attack that attacked the edges frequently and forced defenders to make tackles in space. Moorhead did a great job making a solid rushing attack last year WITH Cristobal's offensive restraints but Dillingham's rushing attack will be fun.

But how much of that could be due to a completely absent Texas and the rest of the big-12 powers being up and down over that same time frame? Texas is the key one here though... Oklahoma has been able to put recruit the big-12 because Texas has been mediocre at best. If you're going to staying the conference footprint why go to Texas if you're a top recruit when you can go to a program with life in it at Oklahoma? Again... Not saying that Riley is a bad coach. He is a GOOD coach but every pundit these days wants to ignore context and crown him as the next USC GREAT coach... He may be that but we are going to have a wait to find out.

Everything that could go wrong did go wrong in that second half. I would like to remind everyone that Oregon's defense pitched a shut out in the first half and then helped lose it all in the second half. I know some fans put the loss on Lockie and Brenner's shoulders but that game was a team effort of bad. Additionally, Brenner was the back up center but not the second best center on the team as that honor belonged to Jake Hanson who was a true freshman at the time and Helfrich wasn't about to burn a redshirt for a second half of a bowl game, and that was was the RIGHT choice.

I love my ducks as much as anyone, well probably more to be honest, but that doesn't mean they don't mess up as an institution. There are times when your team messes up and it is completely 100% ok to say that they did. It doesn't mean you don't love them but it can be quite the opposite. It is out of love that we need to speak truth to power and make the institutions and the things we care about better. And sometimes that means calling them out then they are wrong. Mullens and Oregon are accountable here because they hired Taggart and in truth when anyone within the program heard about these sort of work outs they should have put a stop to them right away. Then even after the fact of it all Oregon only suspended the strength and conditioning coach and then put some oversight on him from Coach Radcliffe... He should have been fired and coach Rad should have had direct control of the strength and conditioning program until a suitable replacement found. Oregon as an institution bears some responsibility. Regardless of whether Brenner would have actually had a shot at the NFL or not doesn't entirely matter because he has health problems now that he didn't have when he joined the program. Again... I love my Ducks and here they need to do right by Brenner and the players who were put into their care as apart of Oregon Athletics.

Special teams was an after thought in the Cristobal era. I'm not trying to defend Bobby Williams but at the same time if special teams is not a priority how good can any coach make them? So many times special teams in the past few years has under performed but the practice reports and all information about the program at the time really made it sound like special teams were often on their own. I know the kickers and long snappers really just spent practice back then on their own unless they were being called forward for a particular scinario in practice. This staff is embracing special teams in a completely different way by incorporating it into practice in a meaningful way rather than just doing a few drills to check a box.

So far like his predecessor Lanning is winning the off season. Bringing in big recruits and getting the fan base hyped for next season. That is the glory of sports, especially college sports, a bad season is washed away by hope for the next season. Let's just hope that Lanning is better than Cristobal in delivering is a better season. Cristobal Has Spoiled Fans By Winning the Off-Season FISHDUCK.COM Mario Cristobal will be Oregon's head coach in 2022. The only way this doesn't happen is if he opts to leave for another program, which is highly unlikely.

The rotating depth chart isn't much of a depth chart. Pretty much the only group that is settled on offense right now may be the offensive line because of the amount of expirence of those players playing together and how Klemm wants a consistent unit. Brown was coronated as the starting QB last spring. This coaching staff wants there to be an actual competition and if that is to happen then they need to see how each quarterback works with each grouping of players. I'm using grouping here and not string because it really looks like everything is still in motion. It's spring... Let the players play and show off what they have learned and how much they have grown.

Yes.... But what usually happens is what is called as tampering which is also technically illegal but no one is enforcing it and it is super difficult to track. They comunicate using old high school coaches and friends of friends sort of thing. So basically what happens is their old high school coach, or 7 on 7 coach or whatever other coach... Is contacted by a perspective team and that old coach reaches out to the player and communicates there is interest and that there is a starting spot waiting for them. It is all in a legal grey area at best but the NCAA isn't going to even bother with these kind of investigations because they are just way too much work and not always that easy to prove. From the sound of it sometimes those communicating with the player are just super vague with something like "if you enter the transfer portal you will find a better team". Then throw NIL on top of it. It all needs regulation but that isn't going to happen soon enough.

Sounds like a culture problem at the time. Yes, I am harking back to my article published last Tuesday. Maybe Rattler was part of the toxic problem at OU, I don't know enough about the situation to know for sure, but if that is the case then Riley recruited some toxic players into an environment and didn't have a culture in place to change their behavior. This is an interesting piece of information and I am sure we will all be keeping an eye on USC to see if there is any smoke.

Game pacing is something that must be improved upon as much as anything else. So many games last year were super slow because of the constant replays and discussions. I get not every call is going to be right and I can live with that but as long as the game's pacing is not unduely impacted and calls are consistent then the reffing will improve.

And some of the preferred walk ons are some pretty good players with some solid scholarship D1 offers in their own right. Those players are big deals as they really are the project players who can be developed into some dominant players. Now, the next step after that would be ensuring they develop and the team holds onto them for a few years as the portal can become a tempting place for a pwo who is a rising star.

We can pretend it's two by the same Riley logic... Really NASTY!

Loyalty and buy in have really changed on the college football landscape. If a player doesn't buy into the program anymore they leave... Or a coach may try and push them out the door.

Thank you for that honesty and in truth I think we all would have felt that way too if he were hired here. However, it is just the nature of coaches and teams as well. If Cristobal decided to stay we would be having some very interesting conversations right now but the truth of the matter there is that a large portion of the fan base didn't want to lose MC. Lanning is full of unknowns which means that as fans we have to recognize that this is Lanning's first HC job and that may come with some less than impressive results out the game. But most of our initial fears have worn off and he was not the splashy hire but he was at least so far a good hire. Personally, I found myself wanting Kiffin for the job at the top of my list... Or at least the top of my list for splashy hires for Oregon. But I am now pretty happy with the Planning choice.

Brenner is often villianizes by some fans as one of the factors that lost us that horrible 2016-17 Alamo bowl. In that game both VA and the starting center (can't remember the name but Notre Dame transfer) went out with injuries. Brenner was brought in as the back up center and Lockie was brought on as the back up QB. Between a sharp decline in QB play and low snaps the offense didn't do anything in the second half. However, with all that said I do think Brenner deserves to win the case and at least some money. The work outs that caused his long term health issues were 100% avoidable and pretty much every player who was around the program at the time has said those work outs were designed to get some athletes to leave the program. That sort of behavior is a dark mark on Oregon's football history but the message needs to be sent that that sort of behavior is unacceptable for any coach in the NCAA... Regardless of how toothless the NCAA is these days.

I don't want them posting that stuff on the forum here ... But I still love reading all about their misery from afar.

I think that the Big-12 in that time frame was really just a one team conference where Riley caught Oklahoma's upswing at the right time as Oklahoma was rising and the rest of the league sputtered. It was also the downfall of the Pac-12 during those playoff appearances for Oklahoma as Oregon declined and the rest of the league pretty much followed. It takes skill and ability to take control over a conference at the right time. Kelly did it in the PAC when USC fell due to some dubious pay of play stuff bedore it was legal... Oh yes, USC I went there. Clemson seized control over the ACC in a time when FSU bottomed out spectacularly... Thanks to Oregon's help in part. Riley took control of a solid program and took over the conference. Now, the big question is whether he can do it again? Timing can play a major role in success... And I do think Riley has been a good coach at the very least but is he going to be able to prove whether he is a great coach?

I remember writing and article last year saying the line rotations we saw last year was detrimental to the offensive production. I feel I link enough of my articles as it is so I won't link it. The offensive line under Cristobal and Mirabal really didn't seem to preform up to the standards we all expected. In a weird way the massive amount of rotation did pay off last year due to injuries and I'm not opposed to cross training but I feel cross training was way too heavily emphasized by the former staff. I want to have a line of maulers who all just get the job done and own the line of scrimmage.

"but if schools can get away with sweetening the pot" Darn that makes it sound like NIL is illegal which it isn't. That is a pretty darn pathetic statement from anyone in the media these days. At this point with NIL no one is "getting away" with anything, schools can organize the communication with those who wish to pay NIL money... Schools at this time can't directly pay players but that doesn't seem to matter. More husky tears please! And Trojan tears are just fine with me too.

2019 I recall being pretty good... But... No there will always be some dinged up olinemen... That is a given in every season.

I'm with Charles on this one... He will absolutely play. But he is unlikely to start. Now, if something were to happen with anyone along the line injury wise then he could move right into a starting spot. That is the scenario that got KT into the starting lineup. He didn't start until there was an injury and the moves right into that spot.

Josh Conerly's Commitment Is More Ducks' Payback Meted Out to UW WWW.SI.COM The loss of the big Seattle tackle to the Huskies' rival was another blow. Overall a rather realistic article with some decent reflection about that program to the north. Their misery is absolutely delightful for us Duck fans. I can't overstate how big this year has been for Oregon's recruiting wins from the state of Washington. Oregon has taken two major players out of the state which has never happened before.

This is beyond big... Oregon Has Failed to Recruit the State of Washington | FishDuck FISHDUCK.COM When J.T. Tuimoloau, a five-star recruit out of the state of Washington, announced Oregon as one of his final four schools, the Ducks were hopeful they could... Now in the 2022 recruiting class cycle Oregon turns it around and lands a 4 star and a 5 star! This is game changing huge from a recruiting standpoint. A big win for Lanning and the first major blow to Riley and USC.

I watched the Bama v TAMU game (that week or the following week don't remember) and one of Bamas star players charged headfirst into a TAMU player and targetting was called but didn't stand. Take that in comparison to the earlier call of that same Stanford drive that took KT out of the game due to at best incidental helmet to helmet contact and you have two conferences with refs calling the same rules very differently. That PI call was one in a series of bad calls and an inconsistent call in how the refs were calling the game. Even if refs make rules calls differently than others, they are human that is to be expected, they need to be consistent in how they call the rule... Players then learn how much they can and can't get away with ... Changing up how they call the penalty is one of the worst things a ref can do... Especially on the final play of the game. Was it pass interference? Sure, if that is how they have called it all game long but that wasn't how they called it until the last play. They let players fight it out... So why wouldn't Wright continue to do that, especially when he has done it all game long... Especially the play before that one.

The problem with the truth is that it doesn't make them look good where they land. No one wants to see an ungrateful player join their team. Though it would be nice if there was a little more honestly in their departure announcements.