Charles Fischer

Thanks, and know that I am very committed to protecting this safe place from the nastiness of the world, where we can “banter-with-our-buddies” about college football. A high percentage of people don’t want to be “polite and respectful,” thus this forum is not a good matchup for them. This forum is not for everybody, and we don’t want to be. Thanks again.

What a great way to kill other sports...

Awesome stuff..."going to a prestige university like Oregon..."

Not sure how to react, as I don't know if he that much of an impact player--even for them? Not the same as Travis, who went to USC, where running backs Dye.

Commissioner George Kliavkoff has some moxie doesn't he? Interesting comments by Nate Costa about Butterfield.... The NCAA is getting a new boss. Mark Emmert announced he’s leaving the post after spending 12 years carefully running the entity in circles. He’ll stay on the job until June 2023 or whenever the NCAA hires his replacement. Sports Illustrated called Emmert a “calamitous captain.” The New York Times termed his impending exit “stormy.” Yahoo columnist Dan Wetzel wrote that Emmert’s tenure was marked with “inertia, ineffectiveness and incompetence.” Yup. But Pac-12 Commissioner George Kliavkoff may have best summarized the scene with a tweet on Tuesday night. Wrote Kliavkoff: “As the Wizard of Westwood once said…” and the commissioner posted a John Wooden quote that read, “Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be.” It was more scalpel than sledgehammer. But Kliavkoff got his point across beautifully. Emmert, 69, got a contract extension by his Board of Governors a year ago. It was supposed to carry him through 2025. Make no mistake, this was a calculated and shove out the door by the NCAA. It couldn’t afford to wait a day longer. Emmert will be treated like a piñata in the coming months. He deserves it. His failure to lead has left the NCAA an eroded mess. Athletic directors have been crying for new leadership for years. They’re now looking to federal lawmakers for help in trying to reel in a name, image, likeness dynamic that has pitted wealthy booster groups against each other, buying high school talent on the open market. The NCAA members had to move on Emmert. He couldn’t lead. Nobody would follow him anymore if he tried. These times call for a massive overhaul of major college athletics. The NCAA needs to figure out what it wants to be. The scene was laughable earlier this month when Emmert arrived at the men’s NCAA Tournament Final Four. Kansas won the title and cut down the nets, all while still being under investigation by the NCAA for major infractions that should have been settled long ago. Here’s another one — Portland State and the University of Oregon both fall under the authority of the NCAA. They play each other at times in college football. PSU will report approximately $15 million in athletic department expenses in the next fiscal year amid questions about its future. Oregon will spend in excess of $100 million and have a booster collective helping land six and seven-figure endorsement packages for its athletes. These two animals are not the same. Neither are McNeese State and LSU. We all can plainly see the separation. So why do the “haves” and “have-nots” still operate under the same section of the NCAA handbook? We’re at a critical juncture in NCAA history. Emmert’s replacement doesn’t have to come from the world of college athletics but that person needs to understand it. The hire will also need to be a non-traditional thinker. The times demand it. The NCAA has drifted woefully out of touch with college athletes and I fear that if the entity doesn’t experience a quick correction it will never find its way back. I like that Kliavkoff fired a public brush-back pitch at the NCAA on Tuesday. He’s got some moxie. If Kliavkoff weren’t so new on the job in the Pac-12 I’d wonder if he were the NCAA’s solution. “King George” sees the benefit of rallying people around the notion of change and college athletics desperately needs it. Jennifer Cohen, the Washington athletic director, told me last summer that she was concerned about the direction of the NCAA. Oregon State AD Scott Barnes echoed that in a conversation with me a week ago at the Beavers’ spring game. Washington State’s Pat Chun said he believes it will take congressional intervention to fix college sports. None of what we’re seeing here is a surprise to anyone who is paying attention. Except maybe Emmert’s timeline, which feels unnecessarily extended. He’s gone? But still hanging around? Emmert is paid $51,923 a week — A WEEK — in salary. Like Wooden said… failure isn’t bad by itself. But if you don’t change amid failure, you haven’t got a chance DEFENSIVE TAKE: Former Oregon defensive coordinator Nick Aliotti was at the Ducks’ spring football game calling the game for the Pac-12 network. He told me he thinks UO quarterback Bo Nix will start the season opener at Georgia, but he’s not ready to hand Ty Thompson the role of No. 2 quarterback. In fact, Aliotti ranked the performances of the Oregon spring game like this: 1. Bo Nix 2. Jay Butterfield 3. Ty Thompson Keep an eye on that race. Former Oregon Assistant Nate Costa told me that he’s a big fan of Butterfield, too. Said Costa: “He’s the son of a coach. He understands offense. I think he also has a photographic memory and can kind of build plays in his head and he processes information really well. What Ty has in arm strength Jay has in accuracy and ball placement… I think he’s someone players gravitate towards. He’s one of those guys you don’t notice in years one, two, three but in years four and five you say, ‘Oh my gosh, he’s draft-able.” More good stuff… • I also asked Aliotti for his NFL Draft analysis of Kayvon Thibodeaux. Aliotti said he likes Thibodeaux’s first step and pass rushing ability but said, “I thought he was very, very disruptive but there were other games where he disappeared. To be an elite guy you have to show up every weekend. Good player. He’ll go early because of his pass rush skills but to me there are a few holes.” • Mike Yam of the NFL Network is a big fan of Thibodeaux and thinks he’ll be a star at the next level. Yam will join me today on the statewide radio show at 4 p.m. PT today. Tune into 750-AM in Portland or listen in Eugene (1050-AM), Klamath Falls (960-AM) and Roseburg (1490-AM). Or you can stream the show live 3p-6p weekdays • Don’t be surprised when Washington State president Kirk Schulz emerges as a candidate for the NCAA president job. Schulz is smart, understands sports, and would be a breath of fresh air. There is one problem out of his control, though. Outgoing president Mark Emmert came to the NCAA from the University of Washington. Would the NCAA turn to the Pacific Northwest twice?

Seven is a receiver, and Cardwell is a running back.

And it is fine to discuss new breaking news, new articles, etc. about NIL, Portal, Pac-12, NCAA, as long as we are discussing the new content, and not rehashing what has been written 100 times already. Thanks to mrspenny for the article... Welcome to College Football’s Free Market WWW.THERINGER.COM NIL has created a messy, lawless recruiting marketplace, but that has always been true in college football. Suddenly, the sport is, for everyone, what it’s always been for the people in charge: a...

What a great-great thread! As I wrote before, Georgia fans that have visited this forum have been all class.

Yep...I just had some time today finally to comment. In many respects--Coach Aliotti had it right; it is a G-Series pulling the guard, and sometimes a tackle or tight end. To me, this new play is more of a sweep than it is a counter--but we can call it anything. Goodness knows I did that 11 years ago with the Chip Kelly videos!

I don't know....a name like that looks like someone in the hills of Arkansas? Small town Alabama? He who laughs last... Careful Trojans....Oregon at your 6:00!

The forward pass? I don't care WHO you are....that's funny!

Really good observation, and one that I'll borrow to offer perspective--we gotta be thankful. Good stuff, thanks.

Glad you saw it because I was going to email you for your opinion. I thought that at first as well, but I ruled out "Counter," because there was not any counter action of the QB and RB going one direction in the backfield to get the linebackers stepping one direction, and the the counter-action in the backfield going the other direction. We can disagree--no sweat. But I'll be we will see a GH Counter in the future....and I'll bet it will be enhanced as this play was as well. I would agree with you that I was mistaken though...that your point and that of others that it is not a sweep is true. It turned into a sweep due to the actions of the corner coming so far inside. So what to name it?

Boy...at 278 pounds? Tough call, because he has a rough-go in the run blocking, but we will need his quick feet in pass protection. And we do not have dancing bears at tackle...

On the other hand...what does it have to do with the prior 50 posts about the Spring Game? Let's stay on topic folks, because this is how we get diverted into other subjects, places we don't want to go.

No sweat Jester, as it is tough for me too.

Completely agree. That is why I am not on-board with those predicting an 11 win season, as we may have to take a small step back to make a big one forward in '23 and '24.

It was written elsewhere that Snee and DT Kristan Williams were not with the team as they are both..."working through some issues." Who knows what that means?

Fantastic observation and confirmation of what Coach Dillingham said!

No way! That is what we do here....is discuss the good and the bad. Besides...it is just our opinions, not pronouncements. We may be right, or we may be wrong, but it is fun to discuss and then see what materializes. I want to see everyone's opinion on every topic, so no....I do not want to discourage anyone from posting. That is what a forum is for!

Usually when you have someone completely new, and perhaps a walk-on....you get a 39 yard average or worse. But this guy averaged over 44 yards a punt? Whew! Great stuff, and thanks.

OK...with all I wrote and watched in slow-motion...I did not notice that and will look for it in many replays coming up. Thanks for pointing that out!

My point as well. An interception because the receiver let the ball go through his hands, bounced off a pad, etc. is fine. But that interception thrown is what a freshman would do... If he is doing that after three years of starting--it means I better get accustomed to seeing it on a regular basis. It is who he is... But can we win in spite of it? (Yes!)

Good point my Duck-Buddy, as I must be grateful to Coach Cristobal for the superb young talent assembled. It lifts the future, no doubt.