Jon Joseph

Why do bird bombs always seem to target my car right after it comes out of the car wash?

No surprise to me that Georgia spends the most on recruiting and has a terrific ROI. Oregon Recruiting: Where Ducks rank among biggest spenders in 2022 DUCKSWIRE.USATODAY.COM College football recruiting has turned into an arms race. So where does Oregon rank amongst the biggest spenders in the nation?

Katz has Oregon ranked at #30. 4th in the Pac-12 behind UCLA, Arizona, and USC. Oregon among Andy Katz's Top 36 teams of 2023-24 DUCKSWIRE.USATODAY.COM Andy Katz puts Oregon in his “way-to-early” rankings for 2023-24, suggesting the Ducks’ March Madness drought is about to end.

Thanks my friend but at 76 years of age I'm too worried about what happens beyond the games already scheduled. With SC/UCLA in the B1G fold Ohio State has already paid UW $500K not to play in Seattle next season. We should expect much of the same.

Thanks for this post, PA. I subscribe to JC's site and I recommend the site as being well worth the subscription.

24 -at Hawaii Idaho TX Tech Boise St 25 - Montana State OK St at Boise St 26 - Boise St at OK St Portland St 27 -at Baylor Utah St 28- ND St Baylor at Utah St 29 - at Michigan State Utah State 30 -Michigan State 31- Hawaii 32 Ohio State 33 at Ohio State The above is up to date according to FBS Scheduling.

No advantage over ESPN with its ESPN+ streaming but a potential advantage over the B1G and B12 that do not have streaming as part of their new deals.

Jon, appreciate and understand your reluctance in regard to this subject. But when it comes down to the numbers Oregon was the 7th most watched CFB team in the country last season And THIS was with 45% of the conference football games being "featured" on a network that few (13M subscribers) could watch. It's not like Oregon and the Pac-10 is moving from a terrific media deal to a questionable media deal. Today's media deal is not close to that of the B1G and the SEC and the new deal will not bridge the financial gap. Hopefully. the new deal will come close to the $31.6M a year B12 deal? Hopefully, streaming will take off. I have seen many the take that the ACC and the SEC Networks will both be streaming on ESPN+.

But perhaps start with Vandy and work our way up?

Thank you WK, but the only flour I am interested in comes in cookies and cakes that someone else bakes. This media rights negotiation has been in the oven for a long time but after a long gestation period, baby elephants come out cute and destined to grow into bigger things. Tom Petty: The waiting is the hardest part.

No comprende?

It is frustrating as an Oregon fan to suffer all the slings and arrows being aimed at the Pac-10 and its failure to complete as of yet, a new media deal. But let's not forget that 45% of the conference games last season were broadcast on the Pac-12 Network. A network with 13M subscribers and a network not available in many parts of the US of A. And the conference commissioner was stuck with this loser of a network and stuck with FOX leading the LA schools to the B1G. Stuck with being lied to by Kevin Warren, the B1G, Carol Folt, and drag-along UCLA. I do not see a streaming component or a partnership with CW and ION as being any less injurious to the conference as was Larry's Lousy Network. A streaming component while coming with risk means that it is coming with perhaps, a huge upside. I do not think any P5 commissioner has been dealt a tougher negotiating hand than George Kliavkoff. Trying to make chicken salad out of chicken spit is not easy.

Update. As of 4/7/22, I have not heard back from Rob. This is as shocking as my once again, not being invited to play in the Masters.

The dreaded affirmation of agreement. To think, we could have a Pac-20 with USC and maybe UCLA getting a bigger share of the revenue pie but SC's Carol Folt led the charge against expansion. It's every Spoiled Child for itself. As a Ducks fan, I wish I had standing to file suit.

More bad news on the new media agreement up on Fansided and The Athletic today. I refuse to post any more of this negative stuff. What's the use? At this point, all of these negative takes are simply piling on. The absence of a deal after months of negotiation speaks for itself.

Great take my friend. We are already seeing the impact of the coming 12-team playoff (which I think will go to 16 in 2027 when ESPN loses its exclusive broadcast agreement) with better OOC scheduling in the SEC and elsewhere. A decade ago I never would have believed that we would see Florida leaving Florida for an OOC game let alone tripping to Salt Lake City. 4 team playoff is a piece of cake for the PO Committee. 2Ls and you are out. But with 12 teams and 6 at-large spots to be filled, I am hoping that SOS is truly going to matter. I am hoping that the OOC schedules UCLA and Michigan played in 2022 and will play in 2023 will automatically DQ you from an at-large spot come 2024/25. Who knows why UGA canceled a H+H with Oregon but it wasn't because Georgia was afraid to play Oregon. Anyone who thinks that has a screw loose. BTW, UGA has a bad OOC schedule this season but playing in the SEC overcomes this kind of OOC schedule. Georgia is a premier CFB program. With the way things are going (not going) media-wise and with OOC big games vs the B12 for the next 6 seasons, I am hoping that the Oregon brand will not suffer.

Georgia canceled a H+H with Oregon as did A+M. Florida is playing at Utah this season. A number of Pac/SEC H+H games have been scheduled over the next decade. Not certain but I think UGA may have a H+H scheduled with CU.

USC has an upcoming game versus an SEC team scheduled. The game will be played in Allegiant Stadium. BYU played a neutral site game there last season. Don't know about Santa Clara and LA.

The ACC is dumping divisions but will stay at 8 conference games. That leaves plenty of inventory if ACC teams want to play 2 P5 OOC games. Notre Dame playing 4 to 6 games every season against ACC teams also mucks things up.

Texas gave Bama all it could handle last season and should be a tough out for Bama in Tuscaloosa this season. Bama has stepped up its OOC scheduling. Arizona has a H+H series scheduled with Bama down the road. Most likely beginning in 2024 Bama and all SEC teams will play 9 and not 8 regular season games.

Good point but Michigan and UCLA in 2023 as they did in 2022, have 3 guaranteed OOC wins. All are being played respectively in LA and in Ann Arbor. Winning in Lubbock (Texas Tech could be a preseason top-25 team,) Waco, and Stillwater is not easy. IMO these are games where Oregon has a lot to lose and very little to gain. And none of these games is must-watch TV. Oregon at this point in time cannot hide its light under a bushel. These games will not result in Oregon being the 7th most-watched team in the nation as was the case in 2022.

The playoff calculus changes in 2024. When, hopefully, the strength of the schedule will matter. Especially when it comes to choosing the 6 at large teams. Duck heavyweights OOC and you do so at your own peril. This is why the SEC is stepping up its out-of-conference schedules. When it comes to SOS let's face it, the Pac-10 will not get the benefit of the doubt. And thanks again SC/UCLA for blowing the conference off which among other things has resulted in Ohio State paying $500,000.00 to bail out of its 2024 game against UW in Seattle.

I'm sorry but I am not giving Mullens a pass when lesser schools in our conference manage to schedule better opponents OOC. I respect your comment but please tell me why this guy is making $1M a year with legions of underlings reporting to him. Amazing job! UGA canceled a Home + Home with Oregon and the Ducks played them in a one-off game in Atlanta. Auburn has a H+H series scheduled with CAL. But Oregon had to play Auburn in a one-off game in Dallas, I think the man with the money he is paid is doing an adequate job at best. When looking at the Athletic Department salaries and the money being wasted I think the man is doing a less than adequate job. He did not hire Altman. He screwed up with Slick and for all of his recruiting process Mario was destroying the Oregon brand, Plus, he has put his hat in the ring for the UGA and A+M AD jobs. I am respectful of everyone's opinion but what has Mullens done sans PK to improve Oregon's athletics? I reiterate. Games versus TX Tech, Baylor, and SMU do nothing to raise the Oregon Q rating at a time when this is most needed,

Yo Comprende. As I noted and how can you help not to do so SSDD by DD,

Another excellent point. For whatever reason(s) the Pac-10 has to make a deal with a streaming company. A company(ies) that have never streamed college sports. Does not matter how we arrived here. This is where we are. ESPN, FOX, CBS, and NBC have negotiated linear broadcast deals for decades. We can all whine about being in this situation but it will not help with making a new and creative deal. And it is just possible the Pac-10 will catch a streaming wave and ride it into a bitchin' beach. For decades innovation has come from the West and then moved East. I've been in a number of 'hairy' business deals and restructuring situations. Sometimes when backed into a corner you exit through the front door. If the West leads the way in streaming college sports why will anyone be surprised?