Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Our Beloved Ducks Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

We have the Best Rushing Offense in the Country

Featured Replies

No.

I don't think it's really debatable at this point.

We have gone against some of the best rushing defenses in the country in conditions they knew we would be running the ball and still averaged 6-7 yards a carry. Nobody does that.

It isn't necessarily the James, Barner, DAT style from a decade ago, but it works against everyone.

The big question is how to maximize that against our opponents the remainder of the year. Just because we can play Iowa ball doesn't mean we should. Playing that style 4 quarters every game is only good for convincing yourself you can hang with anybody, not actually consistently winning.

We can certainly use it at the end of games when first downs become more important than touchdowns. We can use it to retain leads and shorten games.

We can certainly use it in place of bubble screens.

We can use it to set up play action pass to keep the pass rush honest and create more space behind the LBs.

I think in short we need to go to a more pro style offense. A little spread is okay to keep defenses honest, but the rule should be to run it down their throats and pass it over their heads.

Maybe not as clever or cute or entertaining as we'd like, but we have to play to our strengths.

Edited by Solar

  • Administrator
No.

To win in the Playoffs....we need a balanced attack, IMHO. Effective passing downfield will make it easier to open holes for the offensive line with one starter down...

Mr. FishDuck

  • Author
No.
11 minutes ago, Charles Fischer said:

To win in the Playoffs....we need a balanced attack, IMHO. Effective passing downfield will make it easier to open holes for the offensive line with one starter down...

Agreed.

I think there were still times in the second half when Iowa was respecting Dante's arm which gave a little more space in the box.

No.

I’m a big believer in playing to your strengths.

As you mentioned, our running game is clearly the strength of our offense this year (with a young QB who is still learning to read defenses and adjust pass protection) and we have a solid defense, overall. I would base our entire offense off the running game and then use play action to attack the defense down the field, once the opponent’s safeties start cheating up (maybe 20 passes max a game). Kyle Shannahan is a master at this and Will Stein could pick up some things studying the Niners’ offense and how he sets up a defense.

I also favor using Davison more heavily, especially early in games, as he has the ability to wear down a defense opening up the gashing and explosive runs later in the game.

No.
15 minutes ago, Solar said:

Agreed.

I think there were still times in the second half when Iowa was respecting Dante's arm which gave a little more space in the box.

I think what happened was that Dante was exposed in terms of his receiver target preferences. His 1A and 1B Dak and Sadiq were out and then 2 Bryant goes out and he just looked a bit uncomfortable in terms of who throw to.

Johnson stepped up big at tight end and he'll be deadly for years to come.

McClellan is growing into a big threat but he a had a big time drop on third and long that should have been a clutch first down.

Benson, probably 2b or 3, was quiet for most of the game until he wasn't and made some big time plays.

I think Dante is going to have to work with this receivers a bit more and build some more trust outside of 1a and 1b.

Probably didn't help matters that the first series was three incomplete passes. 1 was Dante's fault, 1 was Whittington's fault and 1 was kinda a mix of both sides where the ball placement wasn't great but the receiver could have still got it.

Then wrap it up with an end zone interception and... Yeah the passing game has some work to do without Dak and Sadiq.

Also... Do we move Whittington to receiver?

https://fishduck.com/2024/10/should-noah-whittington-switch-to-receiver/

No.
2 minutes ago, OregonDucks said:

I also favor using Davison more heavily, especially early in games, as he has the ability to wear down a defense opening up the gashing and explosive runs later in the game.

Davison was one of the names mentioned as being a bit dinged up before the game. He was going to play but I think they were going to try and limit him a bit.

Though I LOVED the two runningback packages as Davison and Hill on the field together make a great combo... It was the combo on the field that scored the only Duck touchdown yesterday.

No.

Whittington is our go-to back. Beyond that, he can block, catch the ball and get YAC, and is the best RB at protecting the ball.

There is depth in the WR and TE rooms. I say rely on it

No.

We need to exploit the receivers we’ve brought in by spreading the offense. If we want ti identify mostly as a running team with occasional passing attack, guys will jump into the portal. There are a number of sexy teams out there using the spread effectively as recruiting tool.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.