3 hours ago3 hr Administrator No. Some interesting discussion by John Canzano and Oregon fans....Q: Is it possible that Lanning’s team is pacing itself? Is that the secret buried in the flow of this season? A: I spoke with offensive coordinator Will Stein a few weeks ago. Something he said in our conversation stood out. Stein mentioned watching Ohio State play its best football in December and January. We talked about the art and science of that run. I wondered if UO’s plan this season was to slowly rise to meet the challenges and moments each week, but keep its cleats on the turf for when it counts.Q: Do you think the Ducks are sandbagging games to disguise, disrupt, and obfuscate future game opponent strategies? A: There’s no “sandbagging” going on. But I do think Oregon is pacing itself better this season. The substitution patterns with the defensive backs caught my eye earlier this season. You can tell UO’s coaches are playing more players, looking to distribute the snaps, and trying to build toward playing their best football in December and January. It’s what Ohio State did last season. Mr. FishDuck
3 hours ago3 hr Author Administrator No. I certainly don't think we were sandbagging during the Iowa game; with three top receivers lost....we were fighting to win a game, IMHO. Mr. FishDuck
2 hours ago2 hr Moderator No. Sandbags are used to hold the water out. Hard to do when you’re playing in the rain all the time.
2 hours ago2 hr No. It's an aspect of playing in the Big Ten, and preparing to play physical.2025 season total plays/games – national rank6-Rutgers 726 in 1015-Indiana 694 in 1041-Purdue 643 in 1046-Nebraska 635 in 1084-USC 595 in 998-Maryland 587 in 9101-Oregon 583 in 9 (64.8/game)There are 11 B1G teams located between Oregon and No. 133
2 hours ago2 hr Moderator No. I don’t think we are sandbagging. Responsive pacing would be closer to the truth, as in the sense of how a good boxer figures out, and then anticipates the moves of an opponent in order to defeat him with counter punches. Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by Washington Waddler spelling
2 hours ago2 hr Moderator No. Sandbagging would be very foolhardy. You can't turn on and off the emotions of a game in the game.Although Sam Houston State did put on a rope-a-dope and a thanks for the check clinic in Corvallis.
1 hour ago1 hr No. WW is right, pacing is a better description. Any body who has watched the Ducks play or swim the games against NW, IU, PSU, Whisky and Iowa knows there was no sandbagging.With 7 games left until we hoist the trophy it has been great that many players have been able to play and give the srarters a break.Best of all, look how great the #2's and some #3"s played in a big rime game.Is,that sandbagging?
50 minutes ago50 min No. Yes and no, do I think that against some teams (Rutgers, Northwestern, and Wisconsin) Oregon is holding some stuff back, probably, but I don't think we're deliberately trying to play possum. We're doing what we need to do to win those games. Iowa and Indiana it was just a mix of bad play, bad play calling, and some bad luck with injuries/bounces/officials. We aren't good enough to sandbag against the better teams on our schedule.
16 minutes ago16 min No. There is no way that Coach Lanning is squeaking out close victories by choice. That would be asking for disaster - one more loss and the college football playoff committee will decide our post season fate.I’m sure Coach Lanning would prefer the less stressful route. Edited 9 minutes ago9 min by OregonDucks
10 minutes ago10 min No. My opinion is this may be a coping mechanism in response to seeing outcomes we'd rather not see . . . "they must be holding back."I don't believe the Ducks are holding anything back, and if you asked any coach/player, I'd bet there's no way any of them are okay flirting that closely with losses just to pace themselves or hold back for later. I don't believe those close wins are "part of the plan".The Ducks have some things they need to work on, but the beauty of it all is that they have the coaches, players/talent, and motivation to learn, develop, and get better in time to reach all their goals this year.Go Ducks!
8 minutes ago8 min No. My thought is that there's not as much difference between a 4 or 5 star player as there is 2 or 3 star players from 10 years back.The playing field is getting more level as time goes on. Its now about depth and coaching smarts.I say no to sandbagging.
Create an account or sign in to comment