Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Our Beloved Ducks Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. It would be difficult to stomach Indiana taking the crown this year. It just doesn't make sense to me. First of all, I don't think they're really in the great team category. But this year, no team really is. Every contender has flaws. Every single one. But to watch Indiana get more hype than OBD usually does infuriates me. Indiana or Bama, I'd have to swallow hard to root for the Hoosiers, but I already believe Bama is top three if not the best. I don't want to see an SEC team win a title for 15 more years, so Hoosier Daddy? is my moniker if they get there. Sorry GatOrlando and Nevada Dog, I like both teams, but I am so sick of eSECpn hyping the conference to the degree even the eye test is being overlooked. The SEC is still Bama and Georgia until proven otherwise, and NO I DO NOT BELIEVE A&M is going to win a Natty. Great article Darren...as usual
  3. Yeah, I though about Clemson, but I always thought they kinda had the national name recognition like other blue bloods. More of a gut feeling by me. And, they did win it all in 1981. I put UW in the same vein, hence didn't mention them as an "outsider" who played in the championship game. Subjective for sure.
  4. I feel your pain. Indiana "having our number" though is kind of like us having Michigan's number right now. Hopefully, that continues next year.
  5. It's a thing in the NFL that you are only as good as your biggest weakness. That applies to players (especially QB's) and schemes. The reason being that opposing coaches are good enough to scout your strengths and take those options away, forcing you to play to your weaknesses. I think this has happened to Stein and Moore this year. Penn State, Indiana, and Wisconsin all doing similar things defensively to take away our strengths. Dante Moore does great with a clean pocket and man coverage? Then bring pressure and play complex zone coverages. Stein likes to use up every blade of grass within 10 yards of the LOS? Run a 4-3 multiple defense that crowds the LOS across the width of the field. The next evolution of our offense is for Stein and Moore to get better at executing to their weaknesses. Moore needs to learn how to deal with real time zone schemes with simulated pressure options and learn how to move in the pocket to buy every last millisecond of time. Stein needs to learn how to create openings up the middle of the field and revise the route trees to create opportunities that materialize quicker for Moore. We've had the luxury of being tested to our weaknesses early in the season. I really hope theses 2 weeks are used to strengthen our weaknesses. If we can have just enough success with our weaknesses (which I believe we have enough talent potential to do) that opponents have start defending them, then that will reopen our strengths.
  6. Yeah, The Hoosiers will need to stay healthy.
  7. Yup, the change to a playoff has altered the equation.
  8. Probably not, Ohio State still looks dominate. But, they have the dawgs at the line of scrimmage, so they have chance.
  9. I would, I would root for the Hoosiers. But, also with a great feeling of "crap, it wasn't us."
  10. Yes, that one crossed my mind, but the Ducks technically were not in the "championship game," although they should have been. Of course, that Miami team was loaded, the Ducks woulda had a punchers' chance, but also a chance at getting totally blown out.
  11. Doesn't even make my top 10 nightmare natty teams: Fuskies (obvious reasons) Domers (perennially overrated) Miami (obvious reasons) tOSU (still sick of the "Pac-1" jokes when USC was dominant) Rodents (sure never gonna happen, but man would that suck) USC (see Domers) Scumbag programs like FSU, LSU, etc. Georgia/Alabama, they don't need any more Indiana or any other progrum not OBD that doesn't have a natty
  12. Frankly... Yeah it would suck to see Indiana win it all in year two of their coaching change. Oregon has been toiling to get the pieces put together to make a run at it for decades and hasn't gotten it done yet. Indiana as an institution has not done that, they made one great hire which is at times all it takes. I think Ohio State will probably prove too much for them when they meet in the B1G championship. I don't see either team losing two games and missing out on that game at this point. I think Oregon can only sneak in at this point if Ohio State drops a game and Oregon wins a tie breaker against them as Indiana owns the direct tie breaker on us. I don't feel confident Oregon makes much of a run in the playoff this year but I also feel there is an extra gear or two just waiting to be found for this time. If they can unlock that then the Ducks absolutely could do it. I think we are seeing Indiana at full form and they've been at full form all year. I wouldn't be surprised if we meet Indiana against this year and beat them.
  13. Darren...your ponderings gave me indigestion from the thought of IU winning it all. But in the end...I agree with Jon's point above...
  14. If not Oregon (or BYU, my 1b team), then I'm rooting for Indiana to win it all . . . or some other relative underdog. Indiana's story is too similar to Oregon's to not root for them. A HC "savant" with a coaching staff that's been together for years at multiple teams. Shows how continuity, consistency, scouting, and development can make an impact and overcome programs with far superior talent and resources . . . such a cool story. Wouldn't Clemson be considered part of the "outsider" group to win the championship? At least relating to the last few decades?
  15. With the salaries even the average football coaches now command, they should not be receiving such an exorbitant retirement 🙄 payout at Taxpayer's expense.
  16. I get your POV, but please get back to me after the Big Ten Championship game. I have not seen a dominant, sure thing CFB title winner this season. I have watched Indiana show up and win every game, including road games at a should-be-ranked Iowa and No. 6 OBD, with the opponents playing good defense and without its offense firing on all cylinders. Ohio State is the other most consistent team I have watched. The Texas A&M defense was rolled over in South Bend and by Arkansas.
  17. I totally agree about the strength of Miami, that season...but I also believe that of the three teams, OREGON was the only squad that potentially had a puncher chance to be competitive, or even defeat Miami that year. Losing that earlier game kept the world from learning the truth. It gave the computer an excuse... How Nebraska ended up in that game still infuriates me.
  18. Great post. But I am among many who believe that Miami was a great team and a step above all CFB teams that season. However, I am also among those who know the computers screwed over OBD, and Oregon, based upon humans watching the games played, should have been in that Rose Bowl. So it goes. The BCS system that screwed Oregon over was changed the next season. The PO format that screwed Oregon over last season was changed by a unanimous vote. And an Ohio State team OBD defeated in the regular season finishes in fourth place in the Big Ten and wins it all. 🤬 MERCY!
  19. Thanks, Darren. If OBD doesn't win it all, I definitely want another Big Ten team to win it all. The B1G has won the last two national championships and is disrespected in the final AP Poll before the 1st PO committee poll. Iowa and UW at 6-2 should both be ranked. Nebraska at 6-2, with a win over No. 17 Cincinnati, has a case for being ranked. Michigan is No. 20, and an SC team that defeated Michigan at No. 23. Why in Hades did Michigan play a game at Oklahoma and USC a game at Notre Dame? Where would a 6-1 USC with a home game victory against Washington State, and a 7-1 Michigan with a home game victory over Miami of Ohio, be ranked? Don't laugh. Miami of Ohio is 5-3, 4-0 in the MAC. No. 7 Ole Miss defeated Wazzu in Oxford by three points. No. 15 UVA defeated Washington State at home by two points. Indiana is ranked 2nd and played the Universities of Thin Air out of conference. Thus, the voters must believe that Indiana's wins in the Big Ten are impressive, right? Wait a minute! Where is the same appreciation for wins by two-loss SC, Iowa, UW, and Nebraska? All of the 'Experts' believe the B12 will only advance its champion to the playoffs. And five B12 teams are ranked? What message are the voters in the AP Poll and Coaches Poll sending? How about: "Tony Petitti's Automatic Qualifier Playoff proposal is the only format that makes sense for the Big Ten conference." Please pay attention to where Vanderbilt and Texas are ranked after their game this Saturday. Ditto for Oklahoma at Tennessee. Where are 3-loss Texas and Oklahoma ranked? Where is a Tennessee team with two losses at home ranked? How about a 2-loss Vandy? How much of a bump do the Dores get from beating a team that had to go to OT to defeat Kentucky and Mississippi State? Tony Petitti's format makes B1G sense. The B1G winning, I don't know, five or six championships in a row will advance the B1G above the SEC? Don't count on it. Don't underestimate the influence of ESPN. On Tuesday night, if the PO Committee follows the AP voting pattern, DUCK!
  20. Today
  21. My only issue with Indiana winning the title is the fact that in 2004 i went to my friends house to watch my Ducks play his hoosiers. He graduated from IU, loves their basketball team, lives for IU sports. Needless to say, it was not a good day for me. Now, this year, light smack talking over texts, (hes in Alaska, I am now in Kansas). Once again I suffer through watching OBD fall to the hoosiers. Granted, it is personal but I don't know if I can live in a world where indiana wins a CFB championship before OBD. If it came down to IU versus alabama though, there is no way I can root for bama.
  22. I would be fine on capping PERS to 100k a year. I think Mine B is getting 400k a year from tax payers.
  23. Indiana is a great team with a great coach and I believe they could beat anybody on any given day. I also think that beaten the best teams in the country week after week would expose depth issues that would be too difficult to over come. If they do manage to make the championship game, then Lanning's streak of only losing to championship game participants since his first year would continue.
  24. Each season is it's own entity and identity. Different skill sets of players, depth on the squad, different levels of experience for the coaching staff and injuries. No 2 seasons are alike, no 2 sets of circumstances are alike from year to year. Cignetti has decades of coaching experience. Dan Lanning is still cutting his teeth! He has had great mentors and is building his pedigree. Will Stein has great play calls but does not make in game adjust at times. Dante does not have 61 or 62 starts, he has less than 20. This teams tackles cannot pass block. When the routes come open Dante is already scrambling or sacked. If IU wins the title, then good for them! OBD's will win the title eventually. Maybe even this season. However, opportunity and preparedness must meet at the same place and time. For example, until last seasons format change, tOSU would not have even made the CFP. Ryan Day would have been fired after the Michigan loss. But the Buckeyes were prepared to meet the opportunity that presented itself! I am just hoping we win out to have an opportunity this season. Go Ducks....
  25. Ten times the tuition is the barometer. Yea, good luck with that restraint of trade. Proposed Bill Would Limit Next LSU Football Coach's Pay to $279K

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.