Mike West

I'm not sure there are going to be many programs that can afford football in the next ten years. San Diego State is not going to replace USC as a money generating prospect. And it has the second largest population in California. I don't believe FSU, Clemson and Miami stay in the ACC past 2024. They'll break their contract. Half the country isn't like SEC and BIG10 football. Those fans are for real, we're fair weathered friends. If OBD starts losing to USC like we did in the seventies, are you still going to watch the games?

I'm still in. College football will always be great in my mind. It's been a huge money making industry for decades. We just didn't want to see the ugly side of it. But it's been there all along. I believe the clamour to settle the national title on the field ( instead of by opinion) changed the nature of the game. Tradition wasn't going to settle the issue, and that meant change was inevitable. I also believe the SEC took USC down for practices they routinely institutionalized. NIL is the aftermath, because students saw it as well- hence the lawsuits started soon after. Football is a multi billion dollar business. It is a way of life for a sizable portion of the country. It isn't out here in the West. Except for USC. We can lament traditions were losing, but the ugly part of those traditions were always swept under the rug. Now we see college football the way it's been for the better part of fifty years. The only difference is the tens of billions of dollars at stake now. Thousands of people dedicate their life to this sport. It's an industry. It's a profession. Has been for at least thirty years. I believe we just didn't want to see it that way. I believe the genius level leaders in the sport will find a way to preserve the nostalgia that makes college football so dear to many of it's fans. We have to face reality though. People make a living in the sport. They don't work for free. Will college football resemble the NFL. I'm guessing no.

I have a bad feeling about this. I don't see a PAC anything in 2024. Who is going to fill the void for that huge LA market? Geographically, who is attractive? Surely not the Pacific Northwest. Did any Conference President apply Game Theory to the conditions on the ground the past twelve months? Surely everyone could see USC wasn't going to accept Rutgers making more money a year than the Trojans. Are you kidding me? Conference of Champions. What a hollow theme. So what gives now? OBD are facing the ultimate threat to the brand. Does anyone here believe the Ducks have 12 months to show elite recruits that Oregon will be a destination school to further their football goals?

One thing we can take from the split squads is both coordinators ultimately executed ( took the defense a half to adjust). I like Williams at safety over Hill, BUT Hill did improve this spring. The first play of the Spring Game an example of Dillingham exploiting decision conflicts in the secondary ( the safety had to choose between two "evil" choices). That gave Nix an easy throw. The type that keeps him out of trouble. Nix will have tight windows he must complete accurately (against the more talented defenses). Moving the pocket will help in his case when he starts to get consistent pressure in my opinion. Max protection ( 7 blockers) is another option (I'd run the burners on crossing patterns so they can separate in that scenario). I personally believe the defense is going to surprise lots of people. And the offense will be more explosive if and only if we expose and exploit a defense's weaknesses early and often. Can't wait until fall!!!

You can't blame the kids, until they demonstrate lack of effort. Even the, they just might not truly be elite. The NFL is the perfect laboratory. We know most 5* QBs aren't elite. Stetson Bennet. Darin Thomas. Countless others. Versus the four to five well known guys that flopped. I'm finding my four star guy with enough ability to be accurate on the "route tree". I can develop that kind of talent because he's more likely to perform like CJ Stroud. Because he'll be hungry enough to want to be a guy like Stroud. There are more than enough QBs like that out there.

And that 5* QB isn't much better. I watched both struggle this spring. And we also have our 5* that isn't lighting it up like we've seen at Bama and tOSU. Statistics are saying develop a lower rated QB. Why waste money on a maybe, when you can mold a definite? Bo Nix was also a 5*. I've just mentioned four 5* QBs that aren't even Heisman worthy. And another 5* left tOSU for Texas ( and had garnered a 7 figure NIL deal). Does it really make sense to throw massive dollars at potential, instead of identify and develop capable athletes that will shine if you develop their respective skills better suited to your system?

Something tells me $30 million is going to look foolish five years from now. Stetson Bennet won a Natty for God sakes. Realistically, how many title games are going to feature two top five QBs ( as in the number five QB in his class versus another top five QB of his respective class)? The next few years are going to be a riot. I see many a teenage bust a coming. From my perspective, does millionaire CJ Stroud justify anything less than a Natty? Risk versus reward. What is this kid ( in the article) really worth? And yes, he's just a kid. And a massive risk at that. I seriously think A&M is going to faceplant. We'll just have to wait and see.

You should like Kool Aide Mike!!!!

CAN BE AS GOOD Lanning's first defense has the potential to play dominant ball. But they don't have Bubbas like the South does. So skill and technique will be important. I'm looking for the back seven to develop into a formidable unit ( back six when we blitz). As much as I like this matchup, I'm not sure OBD Will be ready for an elite team like Georgia. Fortunately, gross lost massive talent to the NFL, which will also take them time to replace. Love the points.

I cannot imagine ANY scenario in which we lose to BYU. There are plenty that project a loss to the Cougars. Not going to happen. We've seen two examples already of what is about to happen on offense (the Alamo Bowl and our Spring Game). My question to the pundits is, if Oklahoma couldn't stop our young receivers, what makes anyone think BYU ( or even Utah) can. About Utah, some have said tOSU lucked out because the Utes were missing three key players in the secondary that day. I saw what should have happened in both our games last year against the Utes. They can't stop our receivers. And BYU certainly won't. This is going to be the first year Bo Nix has three F23s. He is going to be looking at plenty of wide open WRs to get the ball to this year. If Dillingham uses that jet motion part of the offense often, OBD Will scorch Earth. Let's see what happens.

Reminds me too much of the two Natty losses. The uni looks damn good, but if we aren't going to use green or yellow, let's go with that look in 2016 (or was it 17') against Nebraska. Black pants, white jersey, white helmet. I personally like the look we had in 2019 the best ( which we saw last year as well). We did lose to Auburn that year with that look, but it was in green and white. Nice uni for a one off...in the middle of the year. When we play in front of millions of eyes, I want to see green and/or yellow.

Who says discussion like that didn't happen at practice? This kid disrespected an opponent, and now his fellow players take a cheap shot at a former coach on social media. No guts. Or respect. Yet they demand respect. How tough would it have been for those kids to reach out to their parents, and use them as proxies to express their displeasure at "being disrespected"? Of course, MC could've pulled the ultimate "Tom Landry" and promptly benched the player for a full quarter. And told the whole team that would be policy from then on. But my question is, do you really think today's players have respect for anything? After that Twitter salvo, I don't.

Utah has a very talented QB that will keep them in position to win games. I don't think they'll have as good a defense, but they are going to score times of points.

Something tells me inflated egos will no longer be an issue.

That's because the LBs are passing to much attention to the QB instead of finding and covering their area of responsibility. Let's hope that changes.

The only problem with that is the semifinals are already boring. The cream teams smoke the pretenders. Now I get that an extra four teams will deliver more dramatic games in the quarterfinals, but the semis have got to get better. So it won't matter much if the SEC dominates in the playoff field (given they already do for the most part now). It's a simple fact: more teams need to up their game. The rest is noise to me when it comes down to it. If you suck now, you'll suck in the playoffs. If you don't get better, you'll get stomped when the real teams face you.

What I saw was a very , very solid defensive effort that controlled Alabama's offense, and spotty QB play. Remember, one of Bama's TDs was a pick six. That was a very close game through and through. And UW played Bama far better than we handled tOSU (completely). When it's said we just need to handle business in the regular season, I believe we need to stomp on all but the elite teams in the conference. No mercy. The cream of the conference has spent to much time letting mediocre teams believe they have a chance to win. We need to see Pete Carroll, David Shaw's and Chip's Oregon teams back in 2010-2012 ( and I hate to say it Chris Peterson's teams in 2015 and 2016 ).

Actually, it does. There are plenty of methods to project wins and losses. And the intangible factors ( injuries, weather, line up changes, etc) are actually factors in as well. Not only do people make a living projecting these "things", quite a few are damn good at it.

And what if Utah also beat Florida! Talk about street cred! Obviously, that is a tall, tall order. The best thing that can happen is, no matter the result of the Georgia game, improving every week should take care of itself. My thought is, what if Bo Nix pulls a Darin Thomas and leads an explosive offense in a similar manner ( most importantly by protecting the ball)?

Not sure why Utah is getting so much love. Last year they fielded the best defense they've had since I can remember, and it was still prone to struggle against the better passing teams. Now, they replace the two best LBs they've ever had, and they still will have trouble with elite passing teams. If AB would've been able to hit those open seam routes last year, we smoke them. So I'm not impressed with this ranking (Nix DOES hit seam routes well, so his sloppiness is the only concern). BYU is pretty good, but they're not top ten material. Point blank. If we generate the kind of points Duck fans are used to, they go down in Eugene. By the way, early estimations have OBD favored in all but two games (Utah and UGA). About what they should be in my opinion. The big question is how quickly DL gets this team to perform at a high level. The talent is definitely there to control all but UGA. But... As we all know, is tough to run the table in the PAC12. Averaging 42/17 will do it though. Let's see what happens.

Nix needs to clean up his "sloppy" play though. UGA's defense is still good enough that Nix will have to play very well. To date, Nix averages 17 PPG against elite defenses. UGA's defense will be talented enough they will be close to elite. He looks better, but he still goofs up routinely. I hope he gets coaches up on that (best way to clean that up is to force him to shoot for perfection during warm ups aka easy ups). Nix's flaws can be improved fortunately.

I get that Willie Taggert is very unpopular. His offense was the most explosive in Oregon history. Check the numbers ( and no Braxton Burmeister' s stats do not count as his his high school was a grade school in comparison to California's elite programs- he was not D1 caliber his freshman year). Taggert definitely would have taken Justin Herbert to two playoff appearances in my opinion. If you disagree, watch Herbert's highlights before and AFTER his injury. He obliterated defenses. Not dominated, Scorched, .and Torched them. Taggart's offense was a weapon of mass destruction with JH healthy. Made Mariota look ordinary ( and yes, I'll argue with anyone in that one- Herbert's NFL career should settle that matter all by itself). Simply put- SEC teams would have struggled to handle JH in that offense, and I mean Joe Burrow numbers I'm certain plenty will disagree. Look at Herbert's in Los Angeles, and go back to his 2917 highlights and tell me what you see looks different Taggert made Cristobal look like the turtle to his rabbit. And even Chip Kelly with Darin Thomas didn't look that clean passing the ball. Don't compare Taggart's arrogance and lack of proper judgement with his 2017 offense. Chip Kelly will never average FIFTY POINTS A GAME- even with a talent like Justin Herbert ( he wants to feature his run game too much). Heresy to many. Tape, however, never lies. Herbert looked like the NFL quarterback he is when he was with Taggart . If he stayed healthy, ANOTHER Heisman would be ours to cherish. Watch that tape. Show me how I'm wrong. Show me why you think Herbert looked like his freshman, junior and senior years. . I will defend Willie Taggart's 2017 offense till my cold dead hands can't hold a pen. His offense was unstoppable.

Kool Aide Mike says bring home a Natty ( yes, this year). Who says fantasies are for kids?

If Nix improves his accuracy (fundamentals in my opinion, he seems careless at times when he throws the ball), he will easily win the job. It does sound like the coaches are giving TT plenty of shots to take the helm, and he isn't ( looking and playing elite enough that is), while Butterfield is more of a natural that really can't be overlooked (and is probably executing as well as TT and thus keeping up with him). High performance is all that matters. OBD can have an explosive offense if these guys execute.

Oh, DAT was pure dominant explosive plays. I'll take the just plain explosive crew the 2010 set of WRs/TEs were. And their eye of the tiger mindset. See, we already have a dominant Oregon team that set the bar. The team that shattered the narrative Oregon can't play with the elite. That team was good enough to reach all eight playoff rounds. Good enough to reach the finals just about every year. And they weren't the most talented any of those years. But they had "it". The inner drive, the lunch pail work ethic, the poise, the pride, the juice. You can't fake what the 2010 Oregon Ducks had. You have it, or you don't. What truly generates explosive plays and dominant defenses? Thermonuclear, weapon of mass destruction attitude. An inner force that explodes outward and won't be stopped. Again, Justin Flowe and Noah Sewell show it already. The rest of the team need only produce thier versions of that willpower. And yes, DAT had inner fire like that. If you've ever seen DAT's high school highlights, you'd know he was far more than a fast dude. And that is why he was a legit five star high school prospect. Utah kicked our butts last year because they had it. Brooks' 1994 crew went to the Rose Bowl because they had it. I could babble another fifteen years about it, but I hope to see it this year. I think DL alludes to it every day. Now Thornton has produced billboard material. Let's hope DL put it on our billboard too, so the team can live up to it.