30Duck

Yep, and right now, CFP, Miami, SMU, Clemson from the ACC, SEC, Conference Champ?

Hey, PAWL!

I'm thinking that way too. It just got harder, touchdown, GT. 17-0, and Georgia didn't come all the way back against Alabama.

3rd and 5, GT runs for 25.

GA fumbles, GT recovers.

Georgia shouldn't try the Kentucky Waltz again.

GT receiver drags GA defender 5 yards for 3rd down conversion, next play GT runs it in for TD. GT 10 GA 0.

Based on recruiting numbers there probably isn't player on GT that would make GA's 2 deep.

GT's fired up, sends 3 at Beck, gets the sack.

GT QB bad throw costs them a TD, FG attempt goes off the goal post.

GT 3rd & 4 on GA's 7 yard line.

GT stops GA on 4th & 1 inside the 5 yard line.

Minnesota 24 @ Wisconsin 7. It's fair to say that OBD definitely got Wisconsin's best.

GT takes a 3-0 lead over GA.

He's currently on the Bulls.

I'm sure he's got intense enmity for osu2.

No bigger indictment on Texas being overrated, let alone in the CPF, but Cowherd and Klatt insist every week that Texas and osu2 is the Championship game. osu2 has a case, but to tout Texas as the obvious opponent makes no sense. The result of their toughest game was getting doubled by Georgia, at home. Duke has a better resume than Alabama. Nut it's Alabama who everybody is looking for a path to the Playoffs for. Miami? Saved 3 times by video review. Notre Dame?

A Backward Incentive System In comparison, the No. 5 seed — currently Ohio State — has a much easier path. They are slated to face the 12-seed (Arizona State) and, if victorious, would then play the No. 4 seed Boise State, a less daunting matchup than Oregon’s. This disparity has sparked widespread criticism, with analysts like Joel Klatt pointing out the fundamental flaws in the current bracket structure. Klatt argues that the system undermines the value of going undefeated, creating a bizarre incentive for teams like Oregon to lose their conference championship to secure a more favorable position.

This is definitely what I want, and I'm sure that's the only thing that will be on Lanning's mind when he's talking to the team.

It goes completely against what a No.1 Seed should be facing that this situation exists at all.

That's a great point. I'm sorry I don't remember who posted it, but it showed that Duke has actually had a better season than Alabama has had. Yet, all the stories are about Alabama's plight.

I didn't get that from JH, on "Talkin' Ducks", but if ever there was a positive after a loss it would be this.

There's always this, Three years ago today Lane Kiffin was fired on an airport tarmac

This is something that should have been caught, but of course this is a committee that goes as far as keeping track of scores. George Wrightster, Once a Duck Always a Duck, says no question the Ducks should go for the No.1 seed. It doesn't matter which team you'd end up playing. Joey Harrington took the other side and said playing an extra game is an advantage if they're against teams that aren't as good. So, is it better to play 2 games against lesser teams, the first one at Autzen? Or play one less game, but aagainst a better team at a neutral site?

Move Boise State up, they just beat a championship team, 34-18.