David Marsh

I had the misfortune of driving through Corvallis yesterday... I thought the place could be improved with some more green and yellow banners with an O motifs rather than those orange and black ones.

From what I have heard about early talk about this idea is that both coasts would play the vast majority of their games within their current conference alignments but at the end of the season there will be some cross conference games, including a conference championship game from the top two teams. Far more managable expense wise to only do one or two cross over games a year.

I think the alliance with the ACC is a far better option despite the geography. The ACC still has it's tent pole teams... Namely teams that give the conference purpose. Now the LA schools would argue that they were the tent pole teams of the conference which in terms of media money they did help bring in a big market. However, the PAC has Oregon and Washington who are both miles ahead of whatever is left in the big-12. The ACC has Clemson, FSU, Miami and part time Notre Dame. And... The ACC is desperate to get more money from their incredibly long and poor media contract.

Well by the sound of it each team has their own set of permanent opponents. Here is the link to what each team's permanent opponents look like. Oklahoma, Texas to SEC in 2024: What a 9-game conference schedule could look like FANSIDED.COM Oklahoma and Texas will be joining the SEC a year ahead of schedule beginning on July 1, 2024. By the grace of god... They used a formula to determine the "best" match-ups. They are trying to preserve some rivalries while they also took a team's win-loss ratio into account to try and "balance" out the schedule so no one was caught off with a murderer's row. However... Tennessee has been very bad over the last ten years and are now turning it around so you can imagine why Bama might be a bit upset about having Auburn, LSU and Tenn... when Auburn is currently the worst of the lot in that list but they would have actually been rated as one of the better programs. Oh well... Bama's tears are almost as good as Husky tears.

Looks like the SEC is going to 9 with 3 perminant opponents. Saban made a big fuss about the ones Bama got. Bama gets Auburn, LSU, and Tennessee. Then they rotate through the rest of the conference. Which is good so that basically if a player stays at their school for 4 years (I know that's silly in this day and age) they get to play everyone twice, home and away.

Considering the 2023 season is still about 6 months away there really isn't much of a rush to announce anything. I know the SEC has announced their rivalries and format change but the B1G can really wait until like January of next year to announce this stuff publicly and be fine. There is probably tons of stuff going on behind closed doors right now.

I wouldn't have been surprised if Altman pushed Ware out the door. Altman basically said at the end of the season that there needs to be a culture shift in the program and he might be giving a nudge or a push out for some who don't match the culture he wants to rebuild at Oregon.

Well... Basketball is the thing going on right now and men's basketball is the no. 2 money maker after football. I know many don't like Canzano but it is basketball season, or at least season's end, so it is timely. Football will be back to the forefront in a few weeks when the tournament is over. Also both Oregon ducks teams going to the NIT and not the big dance does dampen our interest in this year's tournament.

Well short term money yes... But I'd say both were pursuing long term dreams. And neither realized how good they had it at Oregon and how Oregon probably enabled them to be better coaches while they were hear with our resources. Both have had a reality check to some degree. Taggart is now off to the NFL as an assistant coach. Cristobal just had an awful season and had yet another opportunity to learn some critical lessons. In both cases they thought the grass was greener outside of the PAC... Truth is... That isn't always the case and often it is a whole lot more difficult. The PAC is often referred to as a weak conference by the media... And sometimes that has been true but it is perhaps the most competitive conference as top to bottom it is always possible to lose in any given week and it is always difficult to win .

Looks like many may have quietly left the team. Perhaps even with that year one coaching rule where the coach can remove players in the first year and those players retain their scholarship with the university. This would have been done in December but looks like that is probably what happened to some extent.

Even though I knew Oregon wasnt in the big dance, I still put Oregon winning it all. Needless to say my bracket was a bust before the first game.

I read somewhere that Chip was ready to trade almost anything to get Mariota. Mariota was the quarterback he needed in the system he wanted to run. But it was not meant to be.

There has been talk about using Matayo U as a TE as he played some in high school.

A few things this year happened that I think contributed to a mediocre defense. 1. Rebuilding the culture was the first step. The crazy thing is that the best defense in the Cristobal era was 2019 and that had some phenomenal youth with some veteran leaders. Troy Dye was a massive leader on the field and he was a Helfrich recruit. KT was able to get off to a great start because the defensive line and linebackers demanded to be taken seriously and that meant KT had a lot of 1v1s which he could win and did. A veteran culture on the defense was never rebuilt after 2019. 2. Lackluster 5-star linebackers... Sewell had been a monster the previous two years but when his role needed to expand in Lanning's Defense he really didn't seem to take it on with much success. Then Flowe was a loose cannon who was just as likely to get a late hit as a big play hit. Neither were suited for Lanning's Defense and Lanning has brought in linebackers who should change that. I think Sewell was exposed in this defense and it hurt his draft stock and it showed just how limited he really is on the field. 3. Installing the defense Lanning actually wants starts now. When Lanning came in his mission was to maintain the roster and see what he had and use it. It turned out he didn't have a roster that could run his defense so they really used a bend but don't break defense that we have been using for the past few years more or less. With a huge influx of recruits and transfer portal players that should change in a hurry. This year we should see more of the Lanning defense because he has more of his players. Granted the drawback is that he is limited in the number of veterans in his system as many will be learning it for the first time. One of the things he had a Georgia is that he had stacked talent and talent that could cycle in with deep knowledge of the system when players left. He doesn't have that knowledge just yet but it should be there soon. Great article Joshua.

I think swinson probably wouldn't have seen the field that much next year without some major leaps and bounds in development. Thornton doesn't make any sense at all. He was on the rise big time towards the end of the season.

Eating it as a net gain or loss feels a bit silly to me. Sure there is plenty of talent to be gained by the transfer portal but sometimes a team needs a net loss into the portal to accommodate incoming freshman. Stanford, as I have said a million times now, will always be a net loser because they can't bring in much talent due to their academic requirements. USC under Lincoln Riley is a meat grinder where they chew up and spit out athletes so fast that they don't look like a program that will be doing much development at all. Come in ready to play or get out.

I wouldn't count Florence out ... I think he could sneak into the starting line up.

It's the continuation of the notion that the west coast (without the LA schools) has no value. Will the new PAC deal be equal to the B1G deal? No it won't... But if it's good enough then buying into a B1G deal that will require more travel and thus more expenses for a harder path to the playoff doesn't inherently make sense.

And I think this serves those who jump into the transfer portal looking for greener pastures just fine. I'm more concerned about those students who know their ability and know the risk of not finding a new home is too great. But at the same time there are most assuredly programs that are pushing students out in order to make room for transfers and those students who just want to stay at their school and remain on a scholarship that they earned. I don't think there would be that many student-athletes who would take this approach of opting to be cut but remain at the school as many would like to still play football. But I do feel with the meat grinder that is taking place with college athletics that there should be a way that a coach can get rid of a player that gives the player the choice to stay at the school under scholarship.

The solution I am proposing is to extend this rule, with limits the current version for year 1 coaches is a bit much, especially if it is permanent, because right now the problem is that student-athletes who want to remain students at this schools can find themselves in various degrees of toxic football cultures with coaches wanting to open up more room for new players who can make a greater impact. This pushes the student to either leave or live with it which isn't fair on anyone. Coaching staves are working harder than ever to build the roster they need to compete and there will always be players who don't live up to their recruitment billing but those players should be given an option to be cut from the team but retain their scholarship for the duration of their eligibility at the school they chose rather than feel like they don't belong with their team by a coaching staff that would like nothing more than for them to transfer. It gives an option for players who really want to continue to be students rather than athletes. Right now College Football players really seem to fall into two distinct categories. One is the super star player grouping where they are big time players with NFL potential and they are receiving NIL money and basically professionals right now. The other category are players who were good enough to earn a scholarship with their school and some of these players are able to make it big but most of them will only contribute in a limited role whether that is scout team, special team, or even some limited reps during the game. These are the players who are the most negatively impacted by the rise of the Transfer Portal and NIL because these players won't have a home if they go into the portal. These are the players who really get "paid" through receiving their education. There may be Oregon pictures in this article but this isn't an article directly targeted at Oregon but rather all of college football.

He would be outside of year 1 now. But if he used this rule he could have used it in December and there wouldn't have been any announcements about players being removed from the team but retaining their scholarships. So he probably already used this rule and we just don't know about it.

How Oregon's DJ Johnson, Noah Sewell performed at NFL Combine - On3 WWW.ON3.COM On Thursday, Oregon's DJ Johnson and Noah Sewell both went through workouts at the NFL Combine in... Not sure if this was already posted but the NFL scouting comments were pretty harsh. Basically the report summaries say... Lots of potential physical talent for both Sewell and Johnson but lack development. This is pretty bad for our previous coaching staff in a lot of ways because they were the ones who should have really developed these players. It also feels like it answers part of the question as to why Lanning's Defense never came together in year one.

Sabrina is perhaps the most selfless player in the history of the sport. And I know some of you will be like ... Wait what? Didn't she set the record for triple doubles and carry the team on her shoulders sometimes? Yes... And that's what made her selfless. It was always about the team with her and she knew the strengths of her team and everyone's roles. Sometimes she needed to carry the team and put up a big night in scoring to win the game. Other games she just needed to take the shots that were open to her and get the ball to other players and let them score. She was the leader of a very special team. That chemistry isn't easy to recreate but it is up to the coaching staff to build some sort of team cohesion and they have failed to really do so. What is this team's identity? Sabrina's team was all about moving the ball around and letting play makers make plays. And then it was followed up with a stifling defense that punished opponents for their mistakes.

Is Marcus Mariota Destined for Coaching? FISHDUCK.COM Marcus Mariota is the greatest Oregon football player of all time. He won Oregon its first Heisman Trophy and still holds most of... Wrote this a couple years ago. I think the big problem for Mariota is that he needs a scheme that allows for him to run and use his legs, which is really hard to do at the NFL. He has never been a prototypical quarterback for the NFL and what Mariota needs is an offense that that is similar to what he ran at Oregon which isn't truly run at the NFL level because that's not the meta game for the league at this time. Herbert has all the tools to be an NFL quarterback and it showed right out the gate for him. Mariota needs a coach and a scheme that fits what he wants to do and what we are really seeing is that there really aren't that many teams out there that he would be a great fit for in truth and the teams he would be a fit for there are already established quarterbacks in those spots. Is he good enough to take those spots away? Maybe. Will he get the chance? Probably not. I do think Mariota would make for an incredible coach though and I would be surprised if he makes an appearance at Oregon at some point.

I would assume that part of the negotiations with these streaming companies will include the current production of the Pac-12 Network. The Pac-12 network isn't perfect but their production has been pretty good and their commentators do actually seem to know who the players are which is a big bonus. I will say this about the Pac-12 production, if it was just about production value I'd take an end of the day game with the Pac-12 network over ESPN or FS1 which both typically give poor production value at the end of the day. The other big thing at play here is that college football has a bigger following and is worth way more money so the production value will need to be better than MLS which is growing but doesn't have the following at all. So I would think if the Pac-12 network is picked up by Apple or Amazon that it would have the current level of production which is pretty good on the whole.