January 10Jan 10 No. We now have a chance to get some top quality coordinators. Both Stein and Lupoi got out-coached in another big game. Stein has been benefitted by great skill players and has not been particularly good at calling plays. Any suggestions?
January 10Jan 10 Author No. We may need to look outside .... if the new coordinators are rubber stamps, then our situation won't change
January 10Jan 10 No. I'd say we d best get Mehringer some quality help, Dan knows better than is the only thing I'm certain of.I was not and am not sad to see Will go. Just my opinion. What a stupid call on first play of game and qb who looked nowhere else and still threw it to the wrong team.
January 10Jan 10 No. Very least would be a viable QB whisperer...We definitely have had the opportunity to recognize their value!A David Yost type would be a good starting point/baseline. Edited January 10Jan 10 by woundedknees
January 10Jan 10 Moderator No. Bring in a top QB coach capable of being the next OC in a couple years.
January 10Jan 10 No. Geoff Schwartz"My biggest wish for the offense under Mehringer is an expanded passing game. It's difficult to be built via the OL/run game while also having an extensive passing game. Normally have to pick one lane to major in but the passing game just needs new concepts and formations. It needs to have answers for the better defenses that we face. I am curious if there's another add to the offensive staff now that there's time to make those additions. "My add...I would just say that sometimes the limitations of your passing game is based on the limitations of the recognition and mental processing speed of your QB. If it is limited, or your O-line is limited, the play calls gravitate to short throws. And, against better defenses with good DBs that can stick with the WRs, that takes longer for the WRs to get open, and for the QB to avoid the rush and find them.more Schwartz: https://x.com/geoffschwartz/status/2010015034600980990
January 10Jan 10 Moderator No. Without knowing the capabilities of existing coaches why would you already replace them. Changing a major decision at the first sign of adversity is not a good way to gain much respect from existing staff, or future hires.
January 10Jan 10 Moderator No. 1 hour ago, Jemangi said:I'd say we d best get Mehringer some quality help, Dan knows better than is the only thing I'm certain of.I was not and am not sad to see Will go. Just my opinion. What a stupid call on first play of game and qb who looked nowhere else and still threw it to the wrong team.It was a good call that was poorly executed. If DM continues his progressions he sees a wide open JMac for a TD. I watched the video and the safety on the right side flew up to the line of scrimmage to stop what he thought was a pass to the RB. He blew his coverage and left JMac wide open. The safety on the other side had the deep half on Benson’s side. That’s why #5 jumped the route and picked it off.
January 10Jan 10 No. 1 hour ago, DrJacksPlaidPants said:It was a good call that was poorly executed. If DM continues his progressions he sees a wide open JMac for a TD. I watched the video and the safety on the right side flew up to the line of scrimmage to stop what he thought was a pass to the RB. He blew his coverage and left JMac wide open. The safety on the other side had the deep half on Benson’s side. That’s why #5 jumped the route and picked it off.I don’t see it as a good call.Progressions? Was there time for that?It appears to me that Moore was going with the quick out as soon as he received the snap, never looked elsewhere, and the DB anticipated it. Great play.
January 10Jan 10 Author No. There was plenty of time to look for other open receivers. Also, Dante focused entirely on the quick out and his eyes were easily read by the defender. Another predictable Stein call that cost us much. I hope that we will get a new coordinator who will drastically change the Stein model, the model that never works against quality opponents.
January 10Jan 10 No. I realize that our offensive line has and has had some injury issues.. Nonetheless, this qb performance was concerning.I do not believe Dante is another Thompson.Will he develop as Herbert or Dixon? Let's hope so!!
January 10Jan 10 Moderator No. 23 minutes ago, DUCKED said:It appears to me that Moore was going with the quick out as soon as he received the snap, never looked elsewhere, and the DB anticipated it. Great play.The fact that there were two open receivers (JMac and RB with a blocker out front) tells me it’s a good call. The fact that Dante never looked elsewhere and stared down Benson tells me it’s poor execution. I think we get into the habit of blaming Stein, but he makes the play call with the assumption that his QB will make the correct reads.For example, Benson had a CB to his side with a safety over the top. The other side had JMac, Sadiq, Johnson and Hill (in the flat) being covered by a CB, a safety and a OLB. If Moore reads that side first he sees the safety come up to cover the flat while JMac blows past him as he is likely coached to read deepest to shortest route.
January 10Jan 10 No. Assuming DM stays, keep Mehringer coaching the tight ends (huge success) and get a QB guru for Dante. Not blaming it all on him, but unfortunately he has had his worst games when it mattered the most. That's on the coaches IMHO.
January 11Jan 11 No. Definitely needs someone to work with Dante on seeing open receivers and responding to pressure. He's likely to get better next year, but how long will it take, and what if the improvement is only marginal? Mendoza had fewer starts to start this year than Dante had going into yesterday. Need someone who can really work with him.And its pretty clear we got outcoached in last years Rose Bowl and yesterday. I'm not that familiar with how experienced our new coordinators are, but if necessary, bring in some more help. It seems we've been strong enough schematically against the bulk of our schedule, but not against the top teams. Edited January 11Jan 11 by MikeJ
January 11Jan 11 No. Lanning seems fine going out and getting the best possible players in the portal but when it comes to getting the best possible OC and DC he apparently uses different logic. These dudes better be great because what a roll of the dice when Lanning clearly needs coaching upgrades.
January 11Jan 11 No. 5 minutes ago, Utki said:Lanning clearly needs coaching upgradesDisagree. Last year we lost one game to the eventual National Champion.This year we lost two games to the same team... the team that will probably win the National Championship this year. We have one of the best offenses and one of the best defenses in the country -- in several categories. The Ducks have not lost a single game the whole time that Dan Lanning has been here to an unrated team (if I'm remembering correctly).I trust Dan Lanning to continue to make good hiring decisions. That, of course, does not mean that he will always make the best hires.
January 11Jan 11 No. Lost, to the Beavers, in '22, I think... Lanning's growth spurt was just beginning! 😝
January 11Jan 11 No. 2 hours ago, Jon Sousa said:Disagree. Last year we lost one game to the eventual National Champion. This year we lost two games to the same team... the team that will probably win the National Championship this year.I read somewhere today it's been 1161 days (3.2 years) since the Ducks lost to somebody who didn't play in the National Championship game. That's pretty good.
January 11Jan 11 No. 2 hours ago, AnotherOD said:I read somewhere today it's been 1161 days (3.2 years) since the Ducks lost to somebody who didn't play in the National Championship game. That's pretty good.Don't quote me on this (without a re-check), but the longest streaks I could find not losing to a team that eventually played in the National Championship for some recent coaches:Lanning: 1,161Smart: 1,121Swinney: 1,098Day: 1,022Saben: 798Since the Ducks don't play for 238 more days, Dan is going to extend this streak to at least 1,399 days.
January 11Jan 11 Moderator No. 7 hours ago, woundedknees said:Lost, to the Beavers, in '22, I think... Lanning's growth spurt was just beginning!The Beavers finished that year at 10-3 and ranked 17th just a couple spots below the 10-3 15th ranked Ducks. Washington finished that year at 11-2 and ranked 8th. Lanning's never lost to an unranked team and only lost once to a team outside the top ten.
January 11Jan 11 Author No. It is great to look for the positives, but I simply observed that OBD were seriously outplayed and out coached in the 2 most important games in the last 2 seasons. In most of the games against better teams, our offense struggled. Our stats got improved playing Montana State and Oklahoma State, and we get Portland State next season, but against decent foes we were less than impressive. Looking forward to a new OC.
January 12Jan 12 Moderator No. Dante’s natural ability is unquestioned, but the longer his lack of development lingers, the more his coach-ability comes into question.
January 12Jan 12 No. On 1/10/2026 at 10:34 AM, Jemangi said:I'd say we d best get Mehringer some quality help, Dan knows better than is the only thing I'm certain of.I was not and am not sad to see Will go. Just my opinion. What a stupid call on first play of game and qb who looked nowhere else and still threw it to the wrong team.He threw the pass late and behind the ER. It was an inaccurate pass. It wasn't a poor call, it wasn't a poor decision. It was simply poor execution.My opinion of course.
January 12Jan 12 No. I think it would be wise to conclude that Indiana is simply a better team than Oregon, at least this year. Different coordinators wouldn't have made a difference. It might have helped if Oregon had had its full complement of running backs. That way the Ducks might have have run the ball on the first play from scrimmage instead of throwing a sideline pass. That first play, possibly chosen because the coaches were unsure of the running game's strength, set the tone for the whole game. But I still don't think Indiana could have been beaten. The Hoosiers may be a team of destiny. They played a nearly perfect game and deserved to win.It's not a bad thing to finish in the top 4, even when Oregon fans are frustrated at not being able to "win the big one."
January 12Jan 12 No. 13 hours ago, DVH69 said:The Hoosiers may be a team of destiny. If this wasn't evident by the way their early miscues and fumbles bounced safely back into their possession, I don't know what to tell anyone, ha.
January 13Jan 13 No. Regarding the success of OBD this season, I kind of forgot that we started this season with a lot of new starters, and there was a lot of hand wringing over how many wins we could get. It was a FANTASTIC result this year in spite of the heart breaking end. How many teams finished better than OBD?
Create an account or sign in to comment