Jump to content
Charles Fischer

OBD Prediction Contest Was TOUGH Awarding a Winner...

Recommended Posts

FG Lumber nailed the point spread of 18 points with his 35-17 score.  Thus using the criteria of the past--he wins.

 

But EastBayDuckDad had a score that was pretty close at 48-27 (vs. 45-27 actual) but his spread was 21 points.

 

Mic, 45-24, was also 21, and Krsmqn, 38-18 was close at 20 points.

 

If you were deciding...who would you declare the winner, and why?

 

giphy.gif

Mr. FishDuck

Link to post
Share on other sites

EBDD almost nailed the score. Winner in my book

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Until the last 1:03 I was the leader with a spread of 25. Dang the backups for allowing the tree to score.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

See who got closest with TO’s, sacks and passing yards. Add those factors into the equation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the closest to the actual score is more important than the point spread. 

 

EBBD and mic tie for first.

 

On to the tie breakers…

  • Thumbs Up 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

What about an equation of point spread plus total points scored? The contestant with the lowest number off wins.

 

The game had an 18 point spread with 72 points scored. With this formula, let’s see who would win.

 

Score: 45-27 18 spread 72 total points


FG Lumber: 35-17 18. (0) 52 (20), 0+20= 20

 

ebdd: 48-27 19 (1), 75 (3),  1+3= 4

 

mic: 45-24  19 (1), 79 (7),  1+7 = 8

 

krsqvn: 38-18 20 (2), 56 (16), 2+16 = 18

 

This formula gives these results.

1. ebdd 4 off from perfect 

2. mic 8 off

3. krsqvn 18

4. FG Lumber 20

 

Bake this formula into an Excel spreadsheet equation and the answers should self generate to avoid all the math.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think closest to game score,   then on to tie breaker  ebdd  my winner

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Way to open a can of worms.

 

I agree with KKids algorithm, but I think rules are rules, so Congrats FG Lumber.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/2/2022 at 10:29 AM, Charles Fischer said:

FG Lumber nailed the point spread of 18 points with his 35-17 score.  Thus using the criteria of the past--he wins.

 

But EastBayDuckDad had a score that was pretty close at 48-27 (vs. 45-27 actual) but his spread was 21 points.

 

Mic, 45-24, was also 21, and Krsmqn, 38-18 was close at 20 points.

 

If you were deciding...who would you declare the winner, and why?

 

giphy.gif

I predicted Oregon 44-24, so I like my final score numbers best 😉

 

But the rest of my numbers were atrocious.

 

Of the three final score numbers you list, I'd go with EastBayDuckDad because his numbers were closest to each teams final score numbers (total point differential of 3).

 

FG Lumber was way off on each team's final score numbers, even though he had the closest spread number. 

Edited by Desert Duck
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/2/2022 at 10:39 AM, Red Eddy Green said:

Until the last 1:03 I was the leader with a spread of 25. Dang the backups for allowing the tree to score.  

Sorry... but that's your fault for not taking into consideration playing time for the backups 🙂

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/2/2022 at 11:52 AM, Dr Hilarius said:

I think the closest to the actual score is more important than the point spread. 

 

EBBD and mic tie for first.

 

On to the tie breakers…

Exactly. That's why my 44-24 prediction needs to enter the discussion 😉

 

And when I predicted Nix would pass for 369 yards, I think what I meant was that we would rush for 369 yards. Yeah, that's the ticket.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't bet on sports, but for once I wish I had taken the Ducks on points and the over. Had the score pretty close but way off on TOs and passing yards, though I like the idea of maybe trading the latter out for total Nix yards. A lot closer to my prediction, then.

 

Rules for a tie breaker maybe not such a bad idea..

 

no-rules-knife-fight.gif.ad589fe7e7f4ee38c219f4fe5b3fa217.gif

Edited by EastBayDuckDad
Liked it more
Link to post
Share on other sites

EBDD

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Actual

Ducks 45

Furd 27

 

@EastBayDuckDad

Ducks 48 (delta 3)

Furd 27 (delta 0)

total delta = 3

 

@Mic

Ducks 45 (delta 0)

Furd 24 (delta 3)

total delta = 3

 

@FG Lumber

Ducks 35 (delta 10)

Furd 17 (delta 10)

total delta = 20

 

IMHO, the official “we-won-by-x-TDs” is harder to get perfect but is a less accurate picture of how the game was played. 

  • Wow 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...
Top