21 minutes ago21 min Moderator No. I'm sure DL breathed some fire and lit up a few guys over the stupid-a** penalties over halftime. Ducks will come out with a purpose after that attitude adjustment. On a positive note, Pickard is doing ok subbing in for Pancho, who was up and looked ok before the half. Ducks get the ball to start the 3rd.
19 minutes ago19 min No. Pressure is also my comment: it has been missing against good (or pretty good) teams all season. Run D is very good though. They might as well experiment with some blitz packages. Matayo is not Kayvon Thib. And Tuioti is not much of a threat either, although both are very good at run defense. Maybe sub in other pass rushers? Maybe take out the nickel (or nose tackle) and add another pass rusher?
9 minutes ago9 min No. I don’t like the decision to go for it on 4th from midfield. The defense has been playing well. Pin USC back deep. That stop might give them the Mo.
9 minutes ago9 min No. 2nd half adjustments in neither the Cristbal nor Lanning eras have screamed of a title contender...IMHO
7 minutes ago7 min No. Dang. That hold by McClellan wasn't necessary (Sadiq had the first down and then some).
6 minutes ago6 min Moderator No. I don't know why they couldn't let Davidson pound it in for 1 yard.At lease the defense is dialed in, INT by Canady!
5 minutes ago5 min No. D-fence!Secondary saying “not so fast, my friend!” Edited 3 minutes ago3 min by OregonDucks
3 minutes ago3 min No. We did not need a trick play on 4th and one. Our running game has not been stopped at all.
Just now1 min Moderator No. What was Dante looking at? That USC defender was right in his line of sight.
Create an account or sign in to comment