Jump to content
sad BIG12 fan

Pac-12 Expansion: Big-12 Teams for the Taking?

Recommended Posts

PAC12 should kill the BIG12 now by adding Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, Kansas & Houston. 

 

If Kliavkoff could convince the PAC12 presidents to invite these programs is would kill the BIG12 and solidify the P4. By adding these schools the conference could expand the PAC12 footprint all the way to Kansas City & Houston.  Why these 4 programs. Simply put they are by far the 3 most popular fans bases in the BIG12. Yes they are not TEXAS or Oklahoma. But at the same time they are not Boise St, Fresno St, Hawaii, Wyoming, either.

 

Kansas basketball is must watch TV, with a national following. Texas Tech is by far the 3rd most popular university in Texas, and the 2nd largest alumni base in DFW.  University of Houston is the fastest growing university in Texas but also the fastest growing city in Texas with over 2.5 million people. By adding Kansas, Tech & Houston along with Arizona & UCLA pac12 basketball would be must watch TV. Football would improve as well. Obviously Kansas would be the outlier. Below are just a few random facts.

 

All are Tier 1 universities

Kansas is Tier 1 & AAU

 

State Population

Texas: over 30 Million

Oklahoma: 4 Million

Kanas (Kansas City): 3 Million/Missouri: 6 Million. As you know Lawrence is within 20 Miles of Kansas City. And the vast majority of College sports fans in Kansas City are University of Kansas fans not Missouri fans.

 

Student Size

Oklahoma St: 26,000

Texas Tech: 41,000. 

Kansas: 29,000

Houston: 45,000

 

Endowments:

Kansas: 1.8Billion

Texas Tech: 1.6Billion

OSU: 1.3 Billion

Houston: 1.0billion 

 

Potential year rivalry games vs SEC. Big TV money for the Pac12.

OSU vs Oklahoma

Kansas vs Missouri

Tech vs Texas

  • Great post! 2
  • Applause 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A Red Raider!  Great points, and welcome to this forum.  Do post your thoughts often, although this was a great start.  You make a good case...

 

Images: Texas Tech Red Raider Picture

Mr. FishDuck

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2022 at 12:05 PM, sad BIG12 fan said:

PAC12 should kill the BIG12 now by adding Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, Kansas & Houston. 

 

If Kliavkoff could convince the PAC12 presidents to invite these programs is would kill the BIG12 and solidify the P4. By adding these schools the conference could expand the PAC12 footprint all the way to Kansas City & Houston.  Why these 4 programs. Simply put they are by far the 3 most popular fans bases in the BIG12. Yes they are not TEXAS or Oklahoma. But at the same time they are not Boise St, Fresno St, Hawaii, Wyoming, either.

 

Kansas basketball is must watch TV, with a national following. Texas Tech is by far the 3rd most popular university in Texas, and the 2nd largest alumni base in DFW.  University of Houston is the fastest growing university in Texas but also the fastest growing city in Texas with over 2.5 million people. By adding Kansas, Tech & Houston along with Arizona & UCLA pac12 basketball would be must watch TV. Football would improve as well. Obviously Kansas would be the outlier. Below are just a few random facts.

 

All are Tier 1 universities

Kansas is Tier 1 & AAU

 

State Population

Texas: over 30 Million

Oklahoma: 4 Million

Kanas (Kansas City): 3 Million/Missouri: 6 Million. As you know Lawrence is within 20 Miles of Kansas City. And the vast majority of College sports fans in Kansas City are University of Kansas fans not Missouri fans.

 

Student Size

Oklahoma St: 26,000

Texas Tech: 41,000. 

Kansas: 29,000

Houston: 45,000

 

Endowments:

Kansas: 1.8Billion

Texas Tech: 1.6Billion

OSU: 1.3 Billion

Houston: 1.0billion 

 

Potential year rivalry games vs SEC. Big TV money for the Pac12.

OSU vs Oklahoma

Kansas vs Missouri

Tech vs Texas

Welcome to the forums!  I agree with what you're saying and advocated for taking in some of those teams rather than the "alliance" that the Pac12 formed with the ACC and Big10.  

Simply put, the media exposure and recruiting footprint drastically expands for the Pac12 with those teams.  Can you imagine Oregon going to Houston/Lubbock every other year and vice versa?  Think of all the eyeballs that would be on Oregon from that recruiting area.

 

Before anyone thinks about the distance, LA --> Houston is about 1548 miles.  LA --> Seattle is 1137 miles.  So from a plane flight standpoint, you're really only adding an hour or two...less for the mountain zone teams.  Re-arrange the North and South divisions with each team visiting the other division once a year and it's definitely a feasible thing.

Edited by kirklandduck
  • Great post! 1
  • Applause 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No offense to Red Raider fans but I would consider subbing Baylor in place of Tech.  Baylor is a more attractive opponent (FB, mens /womens bball) and is closer to DFW

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Though I would think it would be nice to have the PAC absorb the big-12 I sorta doubt that is going to happen. 

 

Though doing a big move and adding basically a whole other conference would in some ways make more sense because it would enable the georgaphy to work better for scheduling and a good chunk of games. 

 

I wrote about how the Pac-12 is geographically isolated last week. Here's the article for those who haven't read it. If you disagree with my assessment I take no offense and would love the conversation. 

 

Verdell-v-Nevada-2019-Kevin-Cline-300x30
FISHDUCK.COM

Recently in a John Canzano Mailbag article, he was asked whether or not the Pac-12 should consider...

 

Enjoy.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the distance would be a problem but as Kirkland pointed out it's not that drastic. Now the only problem I see is time zone? Being in the Central time zone those schools are all 2 hours ahead of us. That throws an unfair obstacle for us on the west coast playing away games. It's bad enough in ooc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2022 at 4:03 PM, Duck 1972 said:

I thought the distance would be a problem but as Kirkland pointed out it's not that drastic. Now the only problem I see is time zone? Being in the Central time zone those schools are all 2 hours ahead of us. That throws an unfair obstacle for us on the west coast playing away games. It's bad enough in ooc.

That's not that bad to me.  If they had a 12pm/1pm kickoff in Houston that would be 10am or 11am for us...not horrendous and something definitely manageable for a Saturday.  I'll trade a slightly earlier game time for all that recruiting benefit in the Southeast any day of the week!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't play midday games in Houston unless they have an indoor stadium which I don't believe they have. Again climate would be a factor. We already have to play in so many different climates. Easier for them to adjust to us than we to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Compelling thoughts on Big 12 teams.

 

TV revenue definitely drives the bus. Any expansion needs to be a win/win situation for all involved. However, I would have a team of analysts work through the numbers and look at best/worst case scenarios to see who and what could make sense.
 

Last thing needed is a diluted pool of revenue that generates less money for everyone involved. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice topic and post. Super conferences or a Open division of 40 teams is coming I think

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget Baylor!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we have to make the PAC more popular in California and quite frankly Oregon and Washington too before wo go trying to get a super conference going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sad big12 fan........

Welcome to the forum and please post often. Many on this forum have experienced a personal mini-nuclear meltdown over the pac 12 not expanding into Texas. There are many pros and cons about your expansion thoughts. I am strictly a pros kind of person, so here goes.

 

I really like your 4 choices but i would add Baylor to the mix. Those 5 schools could form their own pod/division. They would travel no more than they do now amongst themselves. Their 3 OOC games could be played in the midwest and a toe dip eastward.

 

That leaves 5 more PAC 17 games to schedule. Put AZ, ASU, Colorado and Utah in another POD and play at least three games against those 3. Again minimal travel.

 

Then play one game annually against the Cal, Stanford, UCLA and USC POD and one game annually against the NW POD. Alternate home and away games.

 

Basically the schedule can be fixed or adjusted so you would have just one long trip east or west each year.

Or do like the NFL and each year you play all the teams from a particular division or POD.

 

If we can travel to Columbus or Atlanta then travel from Eugene to Lubbock or Houston or vice versus is doable.

 

What many people dont understand is if TT is playing Oregon, USC or Utah in a prime time slot then TV sets all across Texas will watch. Same with Houston or Baylor. More eyeballs equal more advertising dollars and more dollars for the schools athletic departments on the TV contract 

 

There are so many options and opportunities for games along with endless recruiting opportunities. How many Texas 4 and 5 stars would attend an Oregon-Houston or USC-Baylor game. Giving youngsters the in person, side line opportunity that is affordable. GEEZ........

 

Well i am going to come back to earth now. There is no room for dreamers who lack academic prowess in the PAC. Thanks sad big 12 fan for Allowing me a brief moment of hope for a better future filled with new conference members, players and fans.

 

Gotta go. Time to take out the garbage........

 

Go Ducks.........

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that stadium size matters all that much but it is a strong indicator of fan support. 

 

Football stadium size. 

TECH: 60,454

OSU: 55,509

Kansas: 50,250

Baylor: 45,140

TCU: 45,000

Houston: 40,000

 

Basketball arenas

Kansas: 16,300

TECH: 15,030

OSU: 13,611

Baylor: 10,347

TCU: 8,500

Houston: 7,100 

 

Yes I will concede that geography matters, but it doesn't necessary correlate to fan support. TCU, SMU, RICE, for just a few schools who cant even fill their stadiums or arenas.  This is why I hope the PAC12 would consider TECH, OSU & Kansas. These three schools have great fan support and are growing. Houston is a gamble, but I'm sure with P5 access they will rise to the occasion. If not Houston, BYU or Baylor would be great pick ups. 

 

Also it does bring back a few old rivalries, not big ones but rivalries nonetheless.

OSU vs Colorado (Old BIG8) 

KU vs Colorado  (Old BIG8)

TECH vs Arizona (Border Conference)

TECH vs Arizona St (Border Conference)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard pass on adding Big 12 teams.  Pac 12 would never add WVU and adding TTU and OK St. only brings in the 6th and 7th largest fan base in the Pac 12.  TCU, Baylor and Houston are non factors when it comes to TV contracts.  They may reside in large cities, but those cities don't care about the team.

 

 

 

Big 12     Pac 12  
      Oregon 5.54 Mil
      USC 4.46 M
      Wash 2.46 M
      UCLA 2.35 M
      ASU 1.95 M
WVU 1.84 Mil      
TTU 1.65 Mil      
OK ST 1.42 Mil      
      Cal 1.14 M
      Utah 1.09 M
      Arizona 1.04 M
BYU 1.03 Mil      
      Colorado .95 M
KSU .90 Mil      
KU .90 Mil      
      Stanford .89 M
      WSU .85 M
ISU .81 Mil      
TCU .80 Mil      
      OSU .79 M
UCF .78 Mil      
Bay .57 Mil      
Hou .47 Mil      
CIN .39 Mil      
  • Great post! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

TCU fan here. 

 

To me the best move for the Pac is to add OSU/TCU/TT/BU.

 

Here are the TV #'s: First is from 2015-2019

 

The numbers next to each school indicate the average number of viewers per week from 2015–19. Streaming numbers are included when available.

Conference championship games and bowl games are not included in these numbers. Games that do not have available data were counted as zero.

  1. Ohio State (5.19M)
  2. Alabama (5.09M)
  3. Michigan (4.18M)
  4. Notre Dame (3.61M)
  5. LSU (3.22M)
  6. Auburn (3.12M)
  7. Georgia (2.91M)
  8. Oklahoma (2.90M)
  9. Clemson (2.67M)
  10. Penn State (2.55M)
  11. Florida (2.46M)
  12. Wisconsin (2.27M)
  13. Texas (2.269M)
  14. Florida State (2.23M)
  15. Michigan State (2.20M)
  16. Southern Cal (1.98M)
  17. Texas A&M (1.851M)
  18. Tennessee (1.849M)
  19. Oklahoma State (1.64M)
  20. Mississippi (1.61M)
  21. Iowa (1.57M)
  22. Nebraska (1.51M)
  23. Miami (1.503M)
  24. TCU (1.495M)
  25. Stanford (1.43M)
  26. Oregon (1.34M)
  27. Arkansas (1.33M)
  28. Washington (1.32M)
  29. Mississippi State (1.31M)
  30. West Virginia (1.27M)
  31. Virginia Tech (1.26M)
  32. UCLA (1.25M)
  33. Louisville (1.22M)
  34. Indiana (1.17M)
  35. Baylor (1.12M)
  36. South Carolina (1.07M)
  37. Navy (1.01M)
  38. Texas Tech (921K)
  39. Washington State (909K)
  40. Northwestern (867K)
  41. Utah (856K)
  42. Army (825K)
  43. Minnesota (803K)
  44. Pittsburgh (781K)
  45. North Carolina (749K)
  46. Iowa State (747K)
  47. California (730K)
  48. BYU (714K)
  49. NC State (703K)
  50. Arizona State (695K)
  51. Syracuse (694K)
  52. Houston (689K)
  53. Kansas State (682K)
  54. Maryland (681K)
  55. Purdue (620K)
  56. Georgia Tech (615K)
  57. Missouri (611K)
  58. Colorado (610K)
  59. Virginia (592K)
  60. UCF (566K)
  61. Memphis (564K)
  62. Arizona (561K)
  63. Kentucky (484K)
  64. Boise State (476K)
  65. Vanderbilt (438K)
  66. Cincinnati (430K)
  67. Duke (410K)
  68. USF (407K)
  69. Boston College (403K)
  70. Illinois (401K)
  71. Wake Forest (398K)
  72. Temple (354K)
  73. Kansas (346K)
  74. Oregon State (295K)
  75. Rutgers (266K)
  76. Tulsa (265K)
  77. SMU (232K)
  78. Colorado State (130K)
  79. Fresno State (127K)
  80. Wyoming (126K)
  81. Air Force (121K)
  82. New Mexico (97K)
  83. Hawaii (94K)
  84. East Carolina (82K)
  85. Nevada (80K)
  86. San Diego State (63K)
  87. UNLV (55K)
  88. Tulane (42K)
  89. San Jose State (30K)

 

With USC the only PAC 12 school averaging more CFB tv viewers than either OSU or TCU from 2015-2019, those two seem to be the obvious adds at 13 and 14, with Baylor and TT rounding out the 16.

 

Next are the #'s from 2021

 

 

Ranking the most-watched college football programs in 2021

The numbers next to each school indicate the average number of viewers per week for a 12-week season.

Streaming numbers are included when available. Games that do not have available data are counted as zero.

  1. Ohio State — 5.22M
  2. Michigan — 4.74M
  3. Alabama — 4.64M
  4. Penn State — 3.87M
  5. Georgia — 3.61M
  6. Oklahoma — 3.46M
  7. Auburn — 3.22M
  8. Michigan State — 2.89M
  9. Notre Dame — 2.84M
  10. Oregon — 2.57M
  11. Wisconsin — 2.41M
  12. Nebraska — 2.29M
  13. Texas — 2.26M
  14. Florida — 2.21M
  15. Arkansas — 2.03M
  16. LSU — 1.90M
  17. Texas A&M — 1.86M
  18. Mississippi — 1.81M
  19. Clemson — 1.74M
  20. Iowa — 1.64M
  21. Purdue — 1.63M
  22. Oklahoma State — 1.58M
  23. Tennessee — 1.51M
  24. Minnesota — 1.28M
  25. Florida State — 1.27M
  26. Indiana — 1.24M
  27. Iowa State — 1.219M
  28. Cincinnati — 1.216M
  29. UCLA — 1.18M
  30. Baylor — 1.16M
  31. Illinois — 1.13M
  32. Southern Cal — 1.11M
  33. Kentucky — 1.08M
  34. Navy — 1.039M
  35. Miami — 1.038M
  36. North Carolina — 1.032M
  37. Utah — 994K
  38. Washington — 985K
  39. Maryland — 971K
  40. West Virginia — 948K
  41. TCU — 907K
  42. BYU — 893K
  43. Mississippi State — 858K
  44. Army — 804K
  45. Texas Tech — 798K
  46. Stanford — 778K
  47. Arizona State — 739K
  48. Northwestern — 716K
  49. Kansas State — 636K
  50. Louisville — 616K
  51. Virginia — 611K
  52. South Carolina — 575K
  53. Pittsburgh — 550K
  54. Kansas — 540K
  55. Wake Forest — 526K
  56. NC State — 525K
  57. Boise State — 495K
  58. Rutgers — 488K
  59. Washington State — 483K
  60. Missouri — 462K
  61. Georgia Tech — 459K
  62. Virginia Tech — 447K
  63. UCF — 407K
  64. Colorado — 366K
  65. Tulsa — 358K
  66. Tulane — 356K
  67. Arizona — 337K
  68. Louisiana — 334K
  69. Oregon State — 321K
  70. South Florida — 303K
  71. East Carolina — 301K
  72. Air Force — 255K
  73. Appalachian State — 241K
  74. Houston — 232K
  75. Coastal Carolina — 223K
  76. California — 222K
  77. Syracuse — 219K
  78. Memphis — 193K
  79. Western Michigan — 171K
  80. SMU — 164K
  81. UAB — 163K
  82. Northern Illinois — 163K
  83. Boston College — 156K
  84. Hawaii — 139K
  85. Ohio — 130K
  86. Eastern Michigan — 122K
  87. Buffalo — 119K
  88. Kent State — 117K
  89. Temple — 112.7K
  90. Ball State — 112.6K
  91. Western Kentucky — 97K
  92. Utah State — 91K
  93. Akron — 90K
  94. Marshall — 85K
  95. Nevada — 78K
  96. Duke — 64K
  97. UTEP — 63K
  98. Colorado State — 59K
  99. San Jose State — 59K
  100. UTSA — 51.9K
  101. Georgia State — 51.7K
  102. ULM — 50K
  103. Fresno State — 45K
  104. Wyoming — 38K
  105. Vanderbilt — 37K
  106. San Diego State — 35K
  107. UNLV — 34K
  108. South Alabama — 26K
  109. New Mexico — 25K

Only Oregon in the Pac had better TV ratings than OSU. OSU seems to be the clear pick for team #13. Of course they and Baylor were atop the Big12 and other than OSU and Oregon, only UCLA in the Pac had better ratings than Baylor last year. After USC, Washington and Utah comes TCU followed by TT.

 

It seems like OSU/BU/TCU/TT would increase the TV ratings average of the Pac if added, with TT being the least valuable of the 4. Houston has worse ratings than Oregon State.

 

https://medium.com/run-it-back-with-zach/which-college-football-programs-were-the-most-watched-in-2021-49ef4f315858

Edited by hiphopfroggy
add link
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have guessed 6 & 7th would be acceptable. That plus it opens up recruiting in the state of Texas. Also it expands the PAC12 TV network.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great point HipHopfroggy. Just want to point out TECH has been historically bad during 2015-2019. But with Joey McGuire I believe things are looking up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great stuff from our new friends from the Big-12, and given us a ton to consider.  Please check in and post often, as you are very welcome.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Mr. FishDuck

Link to post
Share on other sites

We so screwed the pooch when we had the chance to add teams from the Big 12 when Texas and Oklahoma first announced their decision to move to the SEC.  The PAC-12 presidents are stuck in the past and they blew it!!   I don't know if we will ever get that opportunity again. 

 

 I know staying put as the PAC-12 with all that is happening ain't going to cut it in the future.  My hope is when the time comes and the opportunity presents itself in whatever form it comes, we (the Pac-12) don't crawl back into our shell and hide but jump this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see why it hurts us to stay at 12 teams. If Riley gets USC back and our league has 4 to 5 teams that continually are good with 2 great teams (us and SC), win the majority of our ooc games, get in the PO and win our bowl games most of the time our reputation will go up.

 

This will cause our TV rights to be wanted. More money to go around. These other schools don't help us any better than standing pat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/28/2022 at 5:59 PM, Duck 1972 said:

I don't see why it hurts us to stay at 12 teams. If Riley gets USC back and our league has 4 to 5 teams that continually are good with 2 great teams (us and SC), win the majority of our ooc games, get in the PO and win our bowl games most of the time our reputation will go up.

 

This will cause our TV rights to be wanted. More money to go around. These other schools don't help us any better than standing pat.

The reason is TV ratings. OSU/TCU/TT/BU would increase the TV ratings average of the Pac, thus increasing the value of a potential new TV contract.

 

The other great thing about adding 4 schools to the Pac, for Pac schools and their fans, is the return to the original Pac 8. Ship the desert and mountain schools to the east division with the former Big 12 teams and voila, the original Pac 8 is back baby! Which is great for nostalgia but also to get annual games between USC and Oregon, and Washington. Those are big money games that the Pac currently leaves on the table 50% of the time.

 

Adding 4 more teams to the Pac actually increases the # of games between original Pac schools.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2022 at 8:59 AM, hiphopfroggy said:

Adding 4 more teams to the Pac actually increases the # of games between original Pac schools.

This would be probably the only way is buy into more expansion to be honest. 

 

I do feel the expanded conference has ruined some of the rivalries. 

 

Kenyon-Barner-v-USC-2012-Kevin-Cline-300
FISHDUCK.COM

Take a moment and think of this year's conference schedule and pick out the top three games you want to...

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Houston is an interesting case, because Houston is a major TV market. Now that Houston is in a Power-5 conference, I am betting they will launch them up that list pretty quickly, especially if they have some immediate success.  I guess we will find out when they officially start playing games in the Big-12.  

Edited by GeotechDuck
Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue with Houston is that they have a very small fan base. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I am not opposed to expanding the Pac12... I'm also not opposed to jumping ship. Oregon needs to do what is right for Oregon. 

 

Schill and Mullens are smart enough to understand that the UO is getting screwed with the Pac12 profit sharing. I would think they would rather be dividing profits with other schools that actually have profits. Like it or not collage sports are about money. UO earns it... They might as well keep it.

 

I know change is hard. But, all of these options require change. So, might as well study up on ALL the options and make an informed choice.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I realize that, if true at one point, it could be moot in the NEW WORLD ORDER of College Football, but hasn't the PAC-12 historically been opposed to allowing religious universities to join?  So, Baylor and BYU, would not be considered, for example.

Edited by idontrollonshobbas
  • Great post! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...
Top