Sappington finally came through!

MVPs are Sappington, Basso, and Ferguson-Reynolds!

Moore was not good until that last drive. Credit where credit is due, he got it done when it counted most.

They found a way, but that last defensive play will absolutely drive me insane that we had 4 in the box against a running QB!

Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by spartan2785

I need to lay down… 🥵

A win in a tough environment on the road against a very good team. Kickers and special teams were not a weakness. Some key absences and injuries, but found a way.

Looked like Dante is having some nagging injuries. Hope he's better by the Washington game!!!

I dont know if this was the best Oregon game or the worst Oregon game Ive ever seen.

Hard to overlook Whitingtons play.

Guy was a beast.

If someone can please explain why we constantly see one or two Oregon defenders standing in no man's land and defending nobody I would be very happy.

Just now, GODUCKS15 said:

Hard to overlook Whitingtons play.

Guy was a beast.

Whittington was outstanding, all the RBs were amazing. Wish we would have let one of them run the ball instead of Moore on that second to last drive!

Heck of a game by the green and yellow team! Won in spite of playing against 11 in black and gold teamed up with 5 in black and white stripes.

5 penalties for 57 yards against OBD, 1 penalty for zero yards against Iowa? wth???

The snap in Their final TD was snapped at least a half second after the play clock ran out. They even showed it on replay, and the snap was unquestionably after the zero came up.

A win is a win, but my blood pressure can’t keep taking this abuse!

Question: How did Iowa not have one penalty other than the illegal kick? How is that possible in a game like this? Someone really has to look at these refs. If Iowa had 2 or even one penalty I could take it, but NONE!?

AMEN - Solid, Gut Check, Overcoming Dings, Road Victory!

8-1 - That was a difficult watch, but it turned out to be fun in the rain, not the sun. Will the Committee still have OBD ranked behind 1-loss BYU? 2-loss Vandy ahead of 2-loss SC?

Kirk Ferentz in November vs top 10 teams, is now 5-2 😍.

Herbie, clean up the Streit!

The 1 thing I hope they get better at is... run defense. They are pretty good most plays, but still need to get better.

No injuries for Oregon on the D line and linebackers (except 44 was out for a short time). DE/edge should be more dominant.

Or maybe it was scheme? Could have put in another DT and taken out the nickel back? (Just for this game)

Best part of the game was the last drive - just under 2 minutes to get in position for a game winning field goal. That part was solid.

Since we are also talking about officiating: Did anyone else see a missed grounding call on Iowa late in the game? I don't think that ball made it to the line of scrimmage. But I could have been looking at the yard marker on the other side of the 50.

Considering the weather conditions, I think Moore played a great game. His two best receivers were not in uniform! He made crucial decisions to run the ball himself, and those decisions made the difference in the last TD. His passing on the winning field goal drive was as good as it gets.

"How did Iowa not have one penalty other than the illegal kick?"

And some of the calls on Oregon were really ticky tacky.

Just now, oregon123 said:

The 1 thing I hope they get better at is... run defense. They are pretty good most plays, but still need to get better.

No injuries for Oregon on the D line and linebackers (except 44 was out for a short time). DE/edge should be more dominant.

Or maybe it was scheme? Could have put in another DT and taken out the nickel back? (Just for this game)

Best part of the game was the last drive - just under 2 minutes to get in position for a game winning field goal. That part was solid.

Since we are also talking about officiating: Did anyone else see a missed grounding call on Iowa late in the game? I don't think that ball made it to the line of scrimmage. But I could have been looking at the yard marker on the other side of the 50.

Yeah I saw it, there was a receiver like 10 yards away, but I was questioning it. I thought at the end of the drive you could have called it as well since there was no receiver in the endzone when he threw it out of the endzone.

It really seemed like the refs had an agenda. I keep thinking how disappointed the ref looked when he announced the fumble that went to us. For that matter why did we have to call a timeout to get it reviewed? We literally did not receive one call the entire game, I don't think I'm forgetting something.

The Defense shouldn't be expected to carry this team. Our Offensive firepower has simply failed to live up to expectations. This is not a formula for success. Something needs to change.

"Considering the weather conditions, I think Moore played a great game."

He seems to be getting much better at escaping pressure and looking downfield for targets than he was earlier in the season.

Jerry Mixon led team in tackles!!!

Washington is down by three. Wisconsin has almost tripled their B1G average of 5.5 ppg with 13 points. Indiana was a missed toe drag away from losing to a Penn State squad that has a backup QB, interim coach, and zero P4 wins. November is where the contenders win, and with the playoff system in place, you will still be in contention.

Anybody who misses the old system where a writer could determine the champion, a computer would pick the two best participants, or a group of people would pick four teams based off some unknown list of qualities, has to see some positives in at least getting a shot right? If Oregon wins out, they become legendary in Eugene lore. Last year Ohio State fans went from thinking that was the worst season ever, to saying it was a legendary run.

It's snowing in Madison now btw. Washington is driving down by three. Their playoff hopes are on the line. It's an important game because it has playoff implications.

If Washington loses, the game against Oregon becomes just a spoiler. But if they win? That's a playoff game for both teams imo.

"The Defense shouldn't be expected to carry this team."

Very true. But, a really strong playoff team would have stopped Iowa on their last drive. Ducks made so many great plays on D, but totally missed out on turning the ball over on downs on that drive.

I still think Oregon is a playoff team. But just barely a playoff team and not a favorite to win it all.

14 minutes ago, spartan2785 said:

Question: How did Iowa not have one penalty other than the illegal kick? How is that possible in a game like this? Someone really has to look at these refs. If Iowa had 2 or even one penalty I could take it, but NONE!?

The refs always had rain in their eyes when Iowa was holding, like on every other play.

Herbstreit was darn near perfect in his prediction on College Gameday. He even had the fact that one team would have 15 points. However, he picked the wrong team to win. Oregon is definitely now a B1G team with that offensive performance.

My high school coach at Marshfield, Pete Susick told us back in the mid 1950’s: “When the officials are against us, we have to beat them too.” And we did! Attitude is everything.

Sappington bails out some questionable Stein play calling.

24 minutes ago, spartan2785 said:

Yeah I saw it, there was a receiver like 10 yards away, but I was questioning it. I thought at the end of the drive you could have called it as well since there was no receiver in the endzone when he threw it out of the endzone.

It really seemed like the refs had an agenda. I keep thinking how disappointed the ref looked when he announced the fumble that went to us. For that matter why did we have to call a timeout to get it reviewed? We literally did not receive one call the entire game, I don't think I'm forgetting something.

My parents asked why the review was taking so long and I said they were on the phone with vegas looking for a big enough bidder to uphold a blatant fumble as not a fumble.

48 minutes ago, spartan2785 said:

They found a way, but that last defensive play will absolutely drive me insane that we had 4 in the box against a running QB!

I'll rewind and say that drive had several bad defensive plays. 3 and long and Iowa gets a long pass.

Fourth down and they get another long pass.

Yeah that lady play stings as it resulted in points but that drive should have ended long before that play.

I was preparing myself for disappointment the entire game. When we made the field goal it was like everything went silent and the earth stood still.

I'd be just fine if we never played Iowa again. Their style is high risk season wrecker style of ball. They don't care if they win that much as long as they at least have a chance of winning late, and any time you can have a low scoring game you have a puncher's chance.

Screw them. That could have ended our bid for the playoffs.

I mean, we beat them at their own game, but I don't want to play that game, you know?

I'll be a million times happier watching us play our last 3 games.

Considering the weather......take the win and thank our lucky stars.......and don't take much of a message from the performance.

Try standing out in a chilly rain for two hours much less 3 and perform.

As for the playoffs......beat USC first and then remember by the playoffs most injuries will be healed and our QB will be finally relaxed....getting the UCLA misery of having folks in his face every play. That pass at the end was a work of true talent....right on the money in a very small target for distance.

Minnesota next Friday evening at Autzen. Iowa beat them 41-03. GO DUCKS!

37 minutes ago, oregon123 said:

"The Defense shouldn't be expected to carry this team."

Very true. But, a really strong playoff team would have stopped Iowa on their last drive. Ducks made so many great plays on D, but totally missed out on turning the ball over on downs on that drive.

I still think Oregon is a playoff team. But just barely a playoff team and not a favorite to win it all.

With no intention of being pejorative and just askin', does OBD need an S+C coaching change?

Too many 4th Q fades.

Get into the PO and with all hands on deck? A team that finished in 4th place in the B1G last season won it all.

52 minutes ago, spartan2785 said:

Yeah I saw it, there was a receiver like 10 yards away, but I was questioning it. I thought at the end of the drive you could have called it as well since there was no receiver in the endzone when he threw it out of the endzone.

It really seemed like the refs had an agenda. I keep thinking how disappointed the ref looked when he announced the fumble that went to us. For that matter why did we have to call a timeout to get it reviewed? We literally did not receive one call the entire game, I don't think I'm forgetting something.

Have you ever been in a monsoon and tried to pull a hanky out of your back pocket? 😁

I'm kidding. A spot on comment.

Be glad we weren't playing Wisky in the falling snow?

I hate to be Debbie Downer, but with no Bryant, Sadiq or Moore we are Iowa with a better punter. Now we get a short week against another team coming off a bye. I see a trap game against Minnesota. Our defense will soon buckle under the pressure of carrying the offense on their back.

.

10 minutes ago, DrJacksPlaidPants said:

I hate to be Debbie Downer, but with no Bryant, Sadiq or Moore we are Iowa with a better punter. Now we get a short week against another team coming off a bye. I see a trap game against Minnesota. Our defense will soon buckle under the pressure of carrying the offense on their back.

.

I thought we were better than what the score indicated, I just think we had some questionable play calling here and there, there was also the play where Iuli stepped on Moore's foot, that looked like it was going to be a TD or at least a first down, we basically did whatever we wanted in the ground game, but we would eventually shoot ourselves in the foot.

It was just one of those games where it was always going to be difficult. Refs affected the game as well, multiple calls that prolonged drives for Iowa or stopped us, it was noticeable.

I would say we aren't a top 5 team, and I don't think we're really a contender for the national title. Too much inconsistencies in our QB play, our line play, and our LBs are little bit limited for what you expect out of a team that wins a title. Need more pressure on the QB, need to be more consistently stout in the run D.

20 minutes ago, DrJacksPlaidPants said:

I hate to be Debbie Downer,

No...you don't. (There is your track record of posts that I've noticed)

But we'll be OK for Minnesota.

I expect us to look pretty good against Minnesota.

USC and Washington are the games where I really have no idea what Oregon team is going to show up. USC can score but can't defend, and UW is decent at home, rivalry game, weather could be bad.